Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:10 pm
Posts: 6
romothesavior wrote:
D. H2Oman wrote:
I'll give you a hint the ones graduating from schools like Loyola-LA, Pace, Barry, Georgetown, Syracuse, etc are the ones you don't want to hire.


This.



Whoa! How does GULC make it to that list? :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Posts: 2038
Location: Texas
grins_at_bemusement wrote:
romothesavior wrote:
D. H2Oman wrote:
I'll give you a hint the ones graduating from schools like Loyola-LA, Pace, Barry, Georgetown, Syracuse, etc are the ones you don't want to hire.


This.

Whoa! How does GULC make it to that list? :shock:

humor


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Posts: 2355
Quote:
ummm im pretty sure if you got into NYU or Gtown you would go regardless of this


I'm pretty sure I won't be applying to schools that lack integrity.


Please explain to me why this a "lack of integrity". Aren't schools free to evaluate their students as they see fit?

BTW: Georgetown did not retroactively up any grades. It only upped the curve prospectively.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Posts: 5474
I wish I could hate on this, but UT Law inflates grades by using a 4.3 scale.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Posts: 592
JazzOne wrote:
I wish I could hate on this, but UT Law inflates grades by using a 4.3 scale.



Tons of schools are adding the A+ grade as a formal grade. It used to be optional at some schools (and teachers never gave them out), and now it is part of the curve for every class.

For what it is worth, the grouping together for moral assessment (1) retroactive grade changing with (2) changing the curve in the future, is a huge mistake. Curves have been going up for decades now at pretty much every law school, and other areas of study. Once upon a time, a C was average. But the retroactive grade changing is a new phenomenon and should be treated differently.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Posts: 5474
sumus romani wrote:
JazzOne wrote:
I wish I could hate on this, but UT Law inflates grades by using a 4.3 scale.



Tons of schools are adding the A+ grade as a formal grade. It used to be optional at some schools (and teachers never gave them out), and now it is part of the curve for every class.

For what it is worth, the grouping together for moral assessment (1) retroactive grade changing with (2) changing the curve in the future, is a huge mistake. Curves have been going up for decades now at pretty much every law school, and other areas of study. Once upon a time, a C was average. But the retroactive grade changing is a new phenomenon and should be treated differently.

I agree that retroactive grade changing is fundamentally different from implementing an A+ curve. However, I also believe the A+ curve is a thinly veiled attempt to give students higher GPAs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Posts: 592
JazzOne wrote:
sumus romani wrote:
JazzOne wrote:
I wish I could hate on this, but UT Law inflates grades by using a 4.3 scale.



Tons of schools are adding the A+ grade as a formal grade. It used to be optional at some schools (and teachers never gave them out), and now it is part of the curve for every class.

For what it is worth, the grouping together for moral assessment (1) retroactive grade changing with (2) changing the curve in the future, is a huge mistake. Curves have been going up for decades now at pretty much every law school, and other areas of study. Once upon a time, a C was average. But the retroactive grade changing is a new phenomenon and should be treated differently.

I agree that retroactive grade changing is fundamentally different from implementing an A+ curve. However, I also believe the A+ curve is a thinly veiled attempt to give students higher GPAs.



Undoubtedly. It doesn't necessarily raise the median (well, it could be set up that way, but doesn't have to be), but for those who have a 4.01+ gpa, it really sets them up for great jobs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Posts: 7626
TheTopBloke wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/business/22law.html?src=me

WTF?!? This is pathetic. Where's the integrity? I will no longer be applying to the law schools that do this.

It's an insult, and degrades the JD. I don't give a shit about your debts! Grow up you spineless bitches! You're supposed to be lawyers!

Ok, don't apply to HYSCNB. No skin off my back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Posts: 2355
Quote:
Tons of schools are adding the A+ grade as a formal grade.


I appreciate the way that GULC does it. The A+ still only counts as a 4.0 on the transcript, and profs are only instructed to award it for truly outstanding performance- once every few years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:07 am
Posts: 310
seems like a good idea to me. gets the students to look more attractive without compromising anyone's rank, someone who is 50th in the class is still 50th after they increase gpas. if ur an employer and dumb enough to fall for this, then thats your problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Useless Law Schools
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Posts: 2038
Location: Texas
itsfine wrote:
if ur an employer and dumb enough to fall for this, then thats your problem.


--ImageRemoved--

ggocat wrote:
slider wrote:
My prediction is that employers will focus on class rank when GPA becomes useless.

All students aren't ranked at all schools.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: lacrossebrother, pmcline10 and 13 guests



Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     TLS home     TLS forums     TLS wiki     Terms of Service     Privacy Policy     Copyright Policy     Contact     powered by phpBB