Top Law Schools

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:53 pm**

So confused.

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:55 pm**

McAvoy wrote:So confused.

Yeah, I argued with myself twice. I reckon I won, too. I just won an argument on the internet

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:56 pm**

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:57 pm**

cannibal ox wrote:

I'd be pretty depressed too if I was holed up all the time with only a mountain of supplements

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:58 pm**

You can define "school-sponsored." Does that include sponsorship by student organizations such as SBA (e.g. bar reviews), or is it just limited to sponsorship by an official school office such as SAO (which is where your mentor's money is coming from)?

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:59 pm**

I make a throne out of my supplements. I am king. You have no power here.

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:00 pm**

I haven't done any reading since like last Tuesday. Trying to decide if it's worth it to try and catch up tonight or just read supplements the week before finals.

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:09 pm**

BVest wrote:You can define "school-sponsored." Does that include sponsorship by student organizations such as SBA (e.g. bar reviews), or is it just limited to sponsorship by an official school office such as SAO (which is where your mentor's money is coming from)?

I think we would have to consider the intent of the policy maker to determine what was meant by school-sponsored... [mouth foam]

Emo wrote:I make a throne out of my supplements. I am king. You have no power here.

Hmm, a hypothetical. Can I get that in E&E form?

Ilikewhiskey wrote:Slacking

Theoretically, you could learn some stuff before the week before finals

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:22 pm**

You still on track to get all your reading done by Halloween?

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:29 pm**

HarvardTransfer wrote:You still on track to get all your reading done by Halloween?

I'm on track to finish a bottle of wine and at least ten shots of gin tonight. Also that, yes

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:30 pm**

I've spent most of today researching for my memo. Tried to crack the Dukeminier book to do some property reading. Nope. No. No. Nope. Nah. Not happening.

Also I take offense to being called emo. If anything I'm emotionless.

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:51 pm**

emotionless wrote:If anything I'm emotionless.

True.

GreatQuotesFromAGreatBook:Dukeminier wrote:
"Since we open the subject, we might as well give it unified treatment" (343)

"Handing oneself a dirt clod is ungainly" (351)

and perhaps my favorite so far (context: no answer provided)

"Did Major Peel lose because he did not have prior possession, or did he not have prior possession because he lost?" (134)

Posted: **Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:55 pm**

I'm going to put out a supplement called "How to Read Dukeminier" and on the first page it's going to say "Don't." and then it ends. Law students will buy it for the next 200 years.

Posted: **Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:08 pm**

the circle jerk in here needs to stop.

Also, Miriam.

Posted: **Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:13 pm**

Pass.

Posted: **Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:12 pm**

Mojosodope wrote:the circle jerk in here needs to stop.

Also, Miriam.

Nice 1,000th post. I think there must be some relationship between Miriam and circle jerking but I can't quite figure it out

Posted: **Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:30 pm**

She's TLS famous, that's as much of as anyone can ever hope for.

Posted: **Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:37 pm**

I do not get this reference

Posted: **Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:59 pm**

Yeah I don't get this Miriam thing either.

Also this: http://www.utexas.edu/law/sao/academics ... grid1L.pdf

Posted: **Wed Oct 01, 2014 2:02 pm**

Looks like I'll have:

Con law - Levinson
Contracts - Williams
Crim law - Laurin
LRW - not saying to protect identitayyy

Posted: **Wed Oct 01, 2014 2:12 pm**

Attax wrote:Looks like I'll have:

Con law - Levinson
Contracts - Williams
Crim law - Laurin
LRW - not saying to protect identitayyy

LOL yeah that ship didn't sail yet

Posted: **Wed Oct 01, 2014 2:18 pm**

McAvoy wrote:
Attax wrote:Looks like I'll have:

Con law - Levinson
Contracts - Williams
Crim law - Laurin
LRW - not saying to protect identitayyy
LOL yeah that ship didn't sail yet

you'd be surprised at how many people have not really succeeded at identifying me.

Posted: **Wed Oct 01, 2014 2:31 pm**

Attax wrote:
McAvoy wrote:
Attax wrote:Looks like I'll have:

Con law - Levinson
Contracts - Williams
Crim law - Laurin
LRW - not saying to protect identitayyy
LOL yeah that ship didn't sail yet
you'd be surprised at how many people have not really succeeded at identifying me.

Dude, if *I* know you are, you can assume everyone does - I'm Captain Clueless when it comes to matching up TLS and real life; I think I know you and one other poster.

Posted: **Wed Oct 01, 2014 2:33 pm**

ScottRiqui wrote:
Attax wrote:
McAvoy wrote:
Attax wrote:Looks like I'll have:

Con law - Levinson
Contracts - Williams
Crim law - Laurin
LRW - not saying to protect identitayyy
LOL yeah that ship didn't sail yet
you'd be surprised at how many people have not really succeeded at identifying me.
Dude, if *I* know you are, you can assume everyone does - I'm Captain Clueless when it comes to matching up TLS and real life. I think I know you and one other poster.

Oh I assume most people do, but no one has really brought it to my attention so maybe they just don't want me to know. But any convo I've had with people about it they didn't bring it up /shrug. I think my post count may make it difficult for some b/c they don't want to search through it all.

Posted: **Wed Oct 01, 2014 2:40 pm**

People don't want to admit that they know TLS is a thing, would be my guess

I've even gotten called out by a rando. Thankfully there is another TLSer who fits my description perfectly who I can direct McAvoy's identity to.

Top Law Schools

Texas Class of 2017 Forum

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017

Re: Texas Class of 2017