Senior Status Judges Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Senior Status Judges
Wondering if there is any prestige, utility, or career differences between clerking for a senior status USDC judge v. a non-senior status USDC judge. I have an offer from a senior judge.
Thanks for any input!
Thanks for any input!
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Senior Status Judges
In general, no. Your judge will probably not be around as long to mentor you, and you might have an "easier" job if your judge has a lower case load, but I don't think that these are factors that should convince you not to clerk for a senior judge. (Full disclosure: I'm currently clerking for a senior district court judge and loving it).
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:58 pm
Re: Senior Status Judges
Depends. Some senior judges have fantastic reputations and are very prestigious. Some examples: weinstein (EDNY), rakoff (SDNY), calabresi (2d Cir.), etc.
Other senior judges checked out long ago and barely carry a caseload. I have a friend who clerked for a judge like that and basically sat alone in a room 4 days a week. The judge only came in on Wednesdays and just did everything in chambers because she didn't want tot walk all the way to court. She got in trouble when she did sentencings that way.
So basically you need to research exactly what the judge does and makes. Decision based on that.
Other senior judges checked out long ago and barely carry a caseload. I have a friend who clerked for a judge like that and basically sat alone in a room 4 days a week. The judge only came in on Wednesdays and just did everything in chambers because she didn't want tot walk all the way to court. She got in trouble when she did sentencings that way.
So basically you need to research exactly what the judge does and makes. Decision based on that.
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:38 pm
Re: Senior Status Judges
To reiterate what others have said, it depends on the judge. There are a number of senior district judges who are as prestigious, or in some cases more prestigious, than their active judge counterparts (e.g., Judges Weinstein, Rakoff, Breyer, Pollack (before he passed away), Motz, etc.). From a utility standpoint, it really depends on their docket; if the senior judge takes a full docket, or some high percentage of a full docket, then it's the same as an active judge. One thing I would be careful of is making sure that the senior judge hasn't opted out of some particular type of cases that you're interested in. For example, IIRC Judge Breyer in NDCA no longer takes patent cases, and the same goes for Judge Cacheris on EDVA. But, if you don't care about patent cases, then both those judges would be great to clerk for because they still take otherwise full dockets.Anonymous User wrote:Wondering if there is any prestige, utility, or career differences between clerking for a senior status USDC judge v. a non-senior status USDC judge. I have an offer from a senior judge.
Thanks for any input!
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Senior Status Judges
Judge Motz is particularly prestigious?ClerkAdvisor wrote:There are a number of senior district judges who are as prestigious, or in some cases more prestigious, than their active judge counterparts (e.g., Judges Weinstein, Rakoff, Breyer, Pollack (before he passed away), Motz, etc.).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:39 pm
Re: Senior Status Judges
Anonymous User wrote:
Judge Motz is particularly prestigious?
in d.md yes
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Senior Status Judges
Completely depends. In my court, some judges were asked to go on senior status for budgetary reasons and they keep a full caseload. Some are all but pushed out (i.e., not given cases) because they are so checked out. My friend clerks for one of these judges and he basically does nothing 3-4 days/week.
But, really, no employer is going to care. So it might actually be an awesome way to have an incredibly chill job with plenty of reward.
But, really, no employer is going to care. So it might actually be an awesome way to have an incredibly chill job with plenty of reward.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Senior Status Judges
My clerkship with a senior judge was the best year of my life. The judge had a 2/3 caseload, so I really had the opportunity to enjoy the city I was in, take some vacations, and also work on some important cases. I wasn't in line to land SCOTUS or a feeder, and the clerkship really helped me land some big job interviews and offers.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Senior Status Judges
I'm currently clerking for a senior COA judge. The judge has a reduced caseload, but we still get a number of interesting cases. I'd recommend the experience to anyone.
- legalese_retard
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:14 pm
Re: Senior Status Judges
First off, why are having these questions now? You should have already accepted the position or not applied to begin with.Anonymous User wrote:I have an offer from a senior judge.
That being said, the only other thing to consider is that it may affect your job search after the clerkship (in case you don't have one already lined up). You will still get the "prestige" boost and generally encounter the same experience as a clerk with a non-senior judge; however, there is a preference for hiring clerks with active judges, especially for firms in the same district. Firms like having former clerks of judges who are currently on the bench and are likely to be around for several years. Part of the clerkship prestige a firm values is the fact that you worked for the judge and will have better insight on the judge's preferences.
Speaking from the outside though, I can't tell how much of a boost a non-senior judge will give you. Additionally, if you look at the NALP forms for some law firms, they indicate that clerkship bonuses are given on a "case-by-case basis." Not sure if the senior status of a judge might affect that, but I'd imagine that it can be a factor for some firms.
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:33 am
Re: Senior Status Judges
Don't buy the party line, dude. This is a 'rule' that serves the interests of judges and career services offices, not of students. It's a year of your life and it is perfectly reasonable to carefully consider your options.legalese_retard wrote:First off, why are having these questions now? You should have already accepted the position or not applied to begin with.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login