Clerks Taking Questions Forum

(Seek and share information about clerkship applications, clerkship hiring timelines, and post-clerkship employment opportunities)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
FascinatedWanderer

Bronze
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:12 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by FascinatedWanderer » Sun Sep 10, 2017 7:42 pm

Does anyone know when we can start expecting solicitation letters/invites to clerk receptions and such? Not looking for a job, but would enjoy nabbing some free food and drink on someone else's dime.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by rpupkin » Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:07 pm

FascinatedWanderer wrote:Does anyone know when we can start expecting solicitation letters/invites to clerk receptions and such? Not looking for a job, but would enjoy nabbing some free food and drink on someone else's dime.
You'll have to wait awhile. Those receptions generally occur between late January and March.

User avatar
mjb447

Silver
Posts: 1419
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by mjb447 » Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:29 pm

FascinatedWanderer wrote:Does anyone know when we can start expecting solicitation letters/invites to clerk receptions and such? Not looking for a job, but would enjoy nabbing some free food and drink on someone else's dime.
I think we've got some booze in chambers - swing by if you're thirsty.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428117
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:27 pm

ExBiglawAssociate wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I'm in my second year of big law, clerking for a district court judge next year (18-19), and hoping to clerk for a circuit court judge the following year (19-20). I've been applying to circuit clerkships for about 3 months now, but I haven't heard a thing. I'm pretty geographically flexible and I have the district clerkship lined up, so I thought I would at least get some interviews.

1. Is there anything else I can do at this point? Or just keep on applying? I realize it's two years away but from what I gather it seems like most spots are already filled. I've been following OSCAR, TLS, and even checking with some chambers about openings, but I'm not really sure what to do other than wait. FWIW, the clerkship office at my school is useless.

2. I'm open to clerking in 20-21 (so after my district clerkship I would work for a year) if I cant secure a 19-20 circuit clerkship, but I am not sure what to put on my cover letter. Something along the lines of "I intend to return to biglaw for a year after my district clerkship and before this one?" Also, is there there any downside to this path (2 years big law, district clerkship, 1 year big law, circuit clerkship)? I would much rather do the clerkships consecutively, but I will still pursue a 20-21 clerkship if I struck out for 19-20.
Mail in paper applications for judges not on OSCAR (or even judges who are on OSCAR but are not clear about having filled their positions and haven't made clear that they don't want paper apps).
Thank you! Do you have any thoughts on the second question? Not sure how to address the gap in my cover letter.

Laser Lady

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:11 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Laser Lady » Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:51 pm

Anonymous User wrote: Thank you! Do you have any thoughts on the second question? Not sure how to address the gap in my cover letter.
Why not just say, "I'm interested in clerking for you for either the 2019/20 or 2020/21 term"? Since you'd be willing to clerk either year, it makes sense to say so in your cover letter. And there's really no need to include your contingency plan in your cover letter. Even if the judge's OSCAR profile makes it clear that he/she is already full for the 2019/20 term and is only accepting applications for 2020/21, you can simply say that you're interested in clerking for the 2020/21 term. It seems to me that a reasonable judge will make the reasonable assumption that you'll find other legal work to do in the meantime.

I'm generally of the opinion that less is more when it comes to clerkship cover letters, and this is no exception.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


lolwat

Silver
Posts: 1216
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:30 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by lolwat » Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:01 pm

Laser Lady wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: Thank you! Do you have any thoughts on the second question? Not sure how to address the gap in my cover letter.
Why not just say, "I'm interested in clerking for you for either the 2019/20 or 2020/21 term"? Since you'd be willing to clerk either year, it makes sense to say so in your cover letter. And there's really no need to include your contingency plan in your cover letter. Even if the judge's OSCAR profile makes it clear that he/she is already full for the 2019/20 term and is only accepting applications for 2020/21, you can simply say that you're interested in clerking for the 2020/21 term. It seems to me that a reasonable judge will make the reasonable assumption that you'll find other legal work to do in the meantime.

I'm generally of the opinion that less is more when it comes to clerkship cover letters, and this is no exception.
yes, all of this.

User avatar
mjb447

Silver
Posts: 1419
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by mjb447 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:22 am

Yeah, agreed - don't address the gap in your cover letter.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428117
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:42 am

lolwat wrote:
Laser Lady wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: Thank you! Do you have any thoughts on the second question? Not sure how to address the gap in my cover letter.
Why not just say, "I'm interested in clerking for you for either the 2019/20 or 2020/21 term"? Since you'd be willing to clerk either year, it makes sense to say so in your cover letter. And there's really no need to include your contingency plan in your cover letter. Even if the judge's OSCAR profile makes it clear that he/she is already full for the 2019/20 term and is only accepting applications for 2020/21, you can simply say that you're interested in clerking for the 2020/21 term. It seems to me that a reasonable judge will make the reasonable assumption that you'll find other legal work to do in the meantime.

I'm generally of the opinion that less is more when it comes to clerkship cover letters, and this is no exception.
yes, all of this.
mjb447 wrote:Yeah, agreed - don't address the gap in your cover letter.
Thanks!!

Anonymous User
Posts: 428117
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 13, 2017 1:37 pm

Writing sample question: Should I italicize case names below the line? I'm using a paper I wrote in a seminar class and it is formatted like a law review article. Journals don't, but I wonder if a judge might expect it and think I made an error.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
mjb447

Silver
Posts: 1419
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by mjb447 » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Writing sample question: Should I italicize case names below the line? I'm using a paper I wrote in a seminar class and it is formatted like a law review article. Journals don't, but I wonder if a judge might expect it and think I made an error.
I wouldn't worry about it as long as you're consistent, particularly as you'd probably expect a "paper" written during law school to follow journal rules rather than opinion rules.

(Whether a paper from a seminar class generally makes a good writing sample is a different question that I'm leaving as an exercise for the reader.)

Anonymous User
Posts: 428117
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 13, 2017 3:14 pm

mjb447 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Writing sample question: Should I italicize case names below the line? I'm using a paper I wrote in a seminar class and it is formatted like a law review article. Journals don't, but I wonder if a judge might expect it and think I made an error.
I wouldn't worry about it as long as you're consistent, particularly as you'd probably expect a "paper" written during law school to follow journal rules rather than opinion rules.

(Whether a paper from a seminar class generally makes a good writing sample is a different question that I'm leaving as an exercise for the reader.)
Thank you. What are some concerns about using a paper from a seminar class? Sorry if this is an obvious question. I'm using this as my second writing sample for the judges that require two. The first one is a brief I wrote in a moot court competition. I thought it might be helpful to provide the judge with two different types of writing.

User avatar
mjb447

Silver
Posts: 1419
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by mjb447 » Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:24 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
mjb447 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Writing sample question: Should I italicize case names below the line? I'm using a paper I wrote in a seminar class and it is formatted like a law review article. Journals don't, but I wonder if a judge might expect it and think I made an error.
I wouldn't worry about it as long as you're consistent, particularly as you'd probably expect a "paper" written during law school to follow journal rules rather than opinion rules.

(Whether a paper from a seminar class generally makes a good writing sample is a different question that I'm leaving as an exercise for the reader.)
Thank you. What are some concerns about using a paper from a seminar class? Sorry if this is an obvious question. I'm using this as my second writing sample for the judges that require two. The first one is a brief I wrote in a moot court competition. I thought it might be helpful to provide the judge with two different types of writing.
Just that "papers" and "articles" tend to be further removed from the kind of writing you'll do in chambers than is ideal. Generally better to use something prepared during litigation, something that answers a legal question in a discrete factual context, that kind of thing. Using it as a second writing sample is less problematic, though - I'd probably still use two memos or briefs, but much more a judgment call (and some judges do prefer an academic sample, although I think they're in the minority).

User avatar
BulletTooth

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:24 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by BulletTooth » Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:30 pm

mjb447 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
mjb447 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Writing sample question: Should I italicize case names below the line? I'm using a paper I wrote in a seminar class and it is formatted like a law review article. Journals don't, but I wonder if a judge might expect it and think I made an error.
I wouldn't worry about it as long as you're consistent, particularly as you'd probably expect a "paper" written during law school to follow journal rules rather than opinion rules.

(Whether a paper from a seminar class generally makes a good writing sample is a different question that I'm leaving as an exercise for the reader.)
Thank you. What are some concerns about using a paper from a seminar class? Sorry if this is an obvious question. I'm using this as my second writing sample for the judges that require two. The first one is a brief I wrote in a moot court competition. I thought it might be helpful to provide the judge with two different types of writing.
Just that "papers" and "articles" tend to be further removed from the kind of writing you'll do in chambers than is ideal. Generally better to use something prepared during litigation, something that answers a legal question in a discrete factual context, that kind of thing. Using it as a second writing sample is less problematic, though - I'd probably still use two memos or briefs, but much more a judgment call (and some judges do prefer an academic sample, although I think they're in the minority).
Yeah, if it's a district court, you probably want a brief or a memo. My experience is that CoA judges may be more interested in a law review article or other "academic" writing.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
ggocat

Gold
Posts: 1825
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by ggocat » Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:03 am

Anonymous User wrote:Writing sample question: Should I italicize case names below the line? I'm using a paper I wrote in a seminar class and it is formatted like a law review article. Journals don't, but I wonder if a judge might expect it and think I made an error.
Any person looking at your app who actually cares enough about citation form to notice the difference in italics will undoubtedly know Bluebook form well enough to know you've done it correctly.

lolwat

Silver
Posts: 1216
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:30 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by lolwat » Thu Sep 14, 2017 4:26 pm

I got enough D.Ct. interviews using my LR article as a writing sample that I honestly don't think it matters that much. But, in terms of maximizing your chances, I'd say a memo or brief is overall better.

As far as citation format, I'm sure it's up to whomever is actually reviewing the applications, but if it were me, I'd be MUCH more inclined to ding someone for inconsistencies in citing format than not properly completely adhering to the Bluebook. It's easy enough to teach you that case names need to be italicized or however the judge really likes to cite stuff. It's not quite the same if, in the same article, you've got some case names italicized, some underlined, some regular, and some bolded, and I'm trying to figure out if there's a reason you couldn't just stick to doing it one way throughout.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by rpupkin » Thu Sep 14, 2017 4:56 pm

ggocat wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Writing sample question: Should I italicize case names below the line? I'm using a paper I wrote in a seminar class and it is formatted like a law review article. Journals don't, but I wonder if a judge might expect it and think I made an error.
Any person looking at your app who actually cares enough about citation form to notice the difference in italics will undoubtedly know Bluebook form well enough to know you've done it correctly.
Agreed. By the way, some courts (including the Supreme Court) don't follow the Bluebook. And for those courts that do follow it, compliance with BB rules will often vary depending on how much the drafting clerk knows (or cares about) the rules. The size of the font you use is more likely to be an issue than the format for citations.
Last edited by rpupkin on Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jrf12886

Bronze
Posts: 283
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:52 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by jrf12886 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:43 pm

My general experience is that after law school, the importance of the Bluebook is greatly diminished. Judges are mostly concerned with being consistent (both within an opinion and with their prior opinions) rather then technical compliance with the more obscure BB rules.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


runinthefront

Gold
Posts: 2151
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by runinthefront » Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:09 am

jrf12886 wrote:My general experience is that after law school, the importance of the Bluebook is greatly diminished. Judges are mostly concerned with being consistent (both within an opinion and with their prior opinions) rather then technical compliance with the more obscure BB rules.
This is true in my CoA chambers. Just get the law right and cite well enough (and be consistent) so others can pull the source with relative ease.
Last edited by runinthefront on Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428117
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 15, 2017 10:51 am

Instructions from a judge on OSCAR: Please provide supervisor's name and telephone number for each law firm listed as work experience.

My firm doesn't know that I am applying to clerkships and I don't think they'd be happy if they found out. What is the protocol here? Inform my supervisor so s/he doesn't get a call out of the blue (I know, slim chance the judge is even interested in my app)? Not apply to this judge?

User avatar
jrf12886

Bronze
Posts: 283
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:52 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by jrf12886 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 12:48 am

Anonymous User wrote:Instructions from a judge on OSCAR: Please provide supervisor's name and telephone number for each law firm listed as work experience.

My firm doesn't know that I am applying to clerkships and I don't think they'd be happy if they found out. What is the protocol here? Inform my supervisor so s/he doesn't get a call out of the blue (I know, slim chance the judge is even interested in my app)? Not apply to this judge?
It's a tough spot to be in. Perhaps you could indicate to the judge that your curent firm is not aware that you are seeking a clerkship. That would be a hint that they shouldn't contact that particular reference until they are prepared to extend an offer (rather than at an earlier screening phase of the process). If you're really concerned, I think you should just skip applying to that particular judge, or apply but do not indicate your current supervisor. (you might get auto-dinged, but more likely the judge contacts references only late in the process and could ask for the information later)

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by rpupkin » Sat Sep 16, 2017 12:55 am

Anonymous User wrote:Instructions from a judge on OSCAR: Please provide supervisor's name and telephone number for each law firm listed as work experience.

My firm doesn't know that I am applying to clerkships and I don't think they'd be happy if they found out. What is the protocol here? Inform my supervisor so s/he doesn't get a call out of the blue (I know, slim chance the judge is even interested in my app)? Not apply to this judge?
Is this a judge you especially want to clerk for? Or is it only one of many judges to whom you're submitting applications? If it's the latter, I'd probably just not apply to this particular judge.

ETA: Sorry, accidental anon (haven't done that in awhile). This is rpupkin.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428117
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:11 pm

What is the etiquette or standard practice on applying to judges who have not yest posted openings for that term? I have a district clerkship lined up for the 18-19 term and am applying to 19-20 circuit clerkships. There are a few judges on OSCAR who are hiring for the 2018 term, but not the 2019 term yet. Can I just apply on OSCAR but indicate in my cover letter that it is for a 19-20 position? Or is that not OK?

runinthefront

Gold
Posts: 2151
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by runinthefront » Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:12 pm

Anonymous User wrote:What is the etiquette or standard practice on applying to judges who have not yest posted openings for that term? I have a district clerkship lined up for the 18-19 term and am applying to 19-20 circuit clerkships. There are a few judges on OSCAR who are hiring for the 2018 term, but not the 2019 term yet. Can I just apply on OSCAR but indicate in my cover letter that it is for a 19-20 position? Or is that not OK?
just apply via paper
Last edited by runinthefront on Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Moonraker

New
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Moonraker » Tue Sep 19, 2017 10:18 am

FascinatedWanderer wrote:Does anyone know when we can start expecting solicitation letters/invites to clerk receptions and such? Not looking for a job, but would enjoy nabbing some free food and drink on someone else's dime.
Hi, these are definitely helpful, but not the only way to seek employment. I began mailing my materials in November and ultimately selected to begin work at a firm that did not mail anything to our chambers. If there is a firm you're particularly interested in, you should start sooner rather than later.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428117
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Clerks Taking Questions

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:10 am

Moonraker wrote:
FascinatedWanderer wrote:Does anyone know when we can start expecting solicitation letters/invites to clerk receptions and such? Not looking for a job, but would enjoy nabbing some free food and drink on someone else's dime.
Hi, these are definitely helpful, but not the only way to seek employment. I began mailing my materials in November and ultimately selected to begin work at a firm that did not mail anything to our chambers. If there is a firm you're particularly interested in, you should start sooner rather than later.
How soon?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Judicial Clerkships”