Page 4 of 4

Re: Bird law

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:13 pm
by daesonesb
I hear the birdman needs a better attorney. He ended up getting some serious probation on those weed charges.Image

Re: Bird law

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:22 pm
by chicoalto0649
daesonesb wrote:I hear the birdman needs a better attorney. He ended up getting some serious probation on those weed charges.Image
rofl

Re: Bird law

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:57 pm
by juzam_djinn
he'll take his advice into cooperation

Re: Bird law

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:12 pm
by Mal Reynolds
This is one of the weirder necros I've seen.

Re: Bird law

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:06 pm
by TheFutureLawyer
Mal Reynolds wrote:This is one of the weirder necros I've seen.
lol'd. I started from the beginning and had no idea it was three years old until this post.

Re: Bird law

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:01 am
by Grad_Student
TheFutureLawyer wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:This is one of the weirder necros I've seen.
lol'd. I started from the beginning and had no idea it was three years old until this post.
Sorry guys lol.

Re: Bird law

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:09 am
by Borg
So does anyone know if the guy ever made it to bird law?

.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:21 am
by Myself
.

Re: Bird law

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:54 am
by M458
Serious question: my friend is debating whether to take out student loans to pay the troll toll. Advice?

Re: Bird law

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:02 pm
by Ohiobumpkin
Least you're not going into tree law.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5gGVOERXss

Re: Bird law

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:48 pm
by juzam_djinn
M458 wrote:Serious question: my friend is debating whether to take out student loans to pay the troll toll. Advice?
well you gotta pay the troll toll to get in

Re: Bird law

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 7:44 pm
by n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t
Patrick Bateman wrote:That lawyer guy, okay. He totally besmirched me today, and I demand satisfaction.
You want him to bang you?

Re: Bird law

Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 7:55 pm
by A. Nony Mouse
There is no point in responding to a post from 2010.