thesealocust wrote:
AdCommie wrote:
If this has been addressed already ITT I apologize: When reading the supplements, reading it cover to cover isn't necessary right (especially hornbooks). I really like Chemerinsky's Con Law (teaching me the subject better than the prof) but come exam time will it matter that I can cite a case that wasn't even covered in class? Trying to find the balance here...
Citing cases at all = rarely necessary (though con law is a major exception to that rule). Citing non-assigned cases = major party foul. There's about a 99% chance you won't get bonus points, and as a result a 99% chance that you're going to wast valuable time mentioning/discussing the point.
Thanks for the quick response! Looks like I can relax the hornbook load a little...
Quick derail: I don't have a supplement for Crim Procedure and I haven't found an E&E. The class uses the Israel, Kamisar, LaFave, King book... thoughts?
Not sure if this will help you, because it's not an E&E type of supplement with questions and answers to test yourself, but
was written by Israel and LaFave.