king3780 wrote:
So I've decided to follow a combination of this method, along with Arrow's. As I enter my third week, I'm feeling pretty good about using supplements to see the big picture. Right now, though, I'm sitting in contracts listening, for 35 minutes so far, to the professor ramble about the briefs he made us turn in last week. I've looked at his past finals and can't see any way that knowing all the details he insists we should know from each case will help, yet he's really trying to hammer the point home. Like in Lucy v. Zehmer, some of us didn't mention the waitress' testimony in the facts. Oooh, there I go down the curve.
i used case brief on Lucy v Zehmer, and it essentially told me the essence of the case was something on the line of "........emotional status at the time of the formation of contract was non-factor............if the actions at time were sufficient for a contract, it should up hold........",and that's what i got out reading the actual case too.
but my contract professor went through the details, called upon people with the details, acted out the details, and some people are typing down everything he's saying, and that got me worried that I am not getting enough out of the class.
i never worry about what others are doing, as long as you can regergitate the concept and understand it, who gives a shit about what novel other students are writing. I swear some people type non stop, its like..calm down and actually listen and contemplate the lecture, you're not a freaking recording machine.
Sick of people strokin the professor throughout the class. Elements of a gunner 1) raises his hand all the freakin time 2) brings up irrelevant topics 3) laughs at every joke 4) when other student asks a question, he/she tries to answer it before the professor does.