ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
transferror
Posts: 816
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 5:42 pm

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby transferror » Mon May 04, 2015 12:05 pm

Whether recent DOJ reports and similar memorandums/statistical analyses may sufficiently put municipalities such as Ferguson and Philadelphia on notice of patterned misconduct such that a failure to train/supervise/discipline in the wake of such reports creates Monell liability under Section 1983.

Building on this:
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/brokensystem-111407_0.pdf

**stole this idea from a friend

User avatar
Businesslady
Posts: 608
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:41 am

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby Businesslady » Fri May 08, 2015 2:42 pm

See Daniel Ho & Donald Rubin - Credible Causal Inference for Empirical Legal Studies

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... id=1982342



User avatar
Businesslady
Posts: 608
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:41 am

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby Businesslady » Mon May 11, 2015 10:09 pm


User avatar
suralin
better than you
Posts: 16477
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby suralin » Sun Mar 06, 2016 9:56 pm

Obligatory bump for the goat thread

User avatar
Businesslady
Posts: 608
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:41 am

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby Businesslady » Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:56 pm

suralin wrote:Pick-up Artists as the New Computer-Human Interaction Experts: Girl You Can't Afford My Affordances Also I Like Your Hair Is It Real

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human%E2% ... nteraction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickup_artist
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affordance


Property and Pwnage: A Unified Affordance Theory of Persons, Houses, Papers, and Effects

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... id=2820759
https://cyber.harvard.edu/IPCoop/82radi.html
http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/v ... text=chtlj (law review article;dr)

User avatar
ratfukr
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 5:44 pm

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby ratfukr » Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:07 am

Businesslady wrote:
FloridaCoastalorbust wrote:Businesslady, how about something on Nussbaum/Sen’s capabilities theory and Mill’s harm principle?

How Nussbaum’s “Hiding from Humanity…” is not as good as Donna Haraway’s When Species Meet and Peter Singer’s Animal Rights is the highest-order reductionist model of this ethical deduction we have going right now.

Not that I know anything


Is this still something people want / in season? Actually finding a use for the MN logic but not gonna make a thing of it

User avatar
suralin
better than you
Posts: 16477
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby suralin » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:19 am

ratfukr wrote:
Businesslady wrote:
FloridaCoastalorbust wrote:Businesslady, how about something on Nussbaum/Sen’s capabilities theory and Mill’s harm principle?

How Nussbaum’s “Hiding from Humanity…” is not as good as Donna Haraway’s When Species Meet and Peter Singer’s Animal Rights is the highest-order reductionist model of this ethical deduction we have going right now.

Not that I know anything


Is this still something people want / in season? Actually finding a use for the MN logic but not gonna make a thing of it

yes plz i'm curious

User avatar
ratfukr
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 5:44 pm

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby ratfukr » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:54 am

suralin wrote:
ratfukr wrote:
Businesslady wrote:
FloridaCoastalorbust wrote:Businesslady, how about something on Nussbaum/Sen’s capabilities theory and Mill’s harm principle?

How Nussbaum’s “Hiding from Humanity…” is not as good as Donna Haraway’s When Species Meet and Peter Singer’s Animal Rights is the highest-order reductionist model of this ethical deduction we have going right now.

Not that I know anything


Is this still something people want / in season? Actually finding a use for the MN logic but not gonna make a thing of it

yes plz i’m curious

We could probably build a sim out without much trouble

User avatar
ratfukr
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 5:44 pm

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby ratfukr » Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:07 am

RIP Palo Alto Ken
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/21/busi ... .html?_r=0

Businesslady wrote:Discretion and TV Casualties: (Forensic Accounting for Preference)



This article is about Coaseans, spectrum, and force projection. If W=F*D, what’s the value of a property “right?” How do you derive signal power?

It’s an Arrow security - Kenneth, what is the frequency?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Rather ... ency.3F.22
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_prices
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 1212001877
http://old.ccer.edu.cn/download/7874-1.pdf
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3132/
http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/procee ... /p1950.pdf
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... id=1121229

User avatar
androstan
Posts: 4397
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby androstan » Wed Feb 22, 2017 10:45 am

Professor Arrow anticipated the modern analysis of markets in which buyers and sellers do not share accurate information (now known as markets with asymmetric information). In a strikingly prescient article published in the early 1960s, he teased apart the complexities that asymmetric information creates in the market for health insurance. He pointed to incentives for patients and their physicians to agree to medical procedures of questionable value when a third party, the insurer, pays the bills.

Professor Arrow’s work spawned the modern treatment of “moral hazard,” whereby the fact of the purchase of insurance systematically affects the behavior of the parties to the contract.

The problems that Professor Arrow flagged a half-century ago figured prominently in the design of the Affordable Care Act, President Barack Obama’s 2010 health care legislation, including its controversial “individual mandate,” which required everyone to buy coverage whether they expected to need medical care or not.


I was only superficially aware of his work on social choice and majoritarian voting schemes. He did so much more. What a brilliant man.

gregfootball2001
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:35 am

Re: ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas

Postby gregfootball2001 » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:47 pm

Fun thread. Something on construction law?




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest