Class to read ahead in Forum
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Class to read ahead in
(I know this sounds gunnerish)
Got some feedback last semester on which of my classes would be good to work ahead on, and trying to figure out which of the following classes people would recommend I work ahead on (Working based on the advice by Ken in his Success in Law School post where he says to work ahead in one of your classes):
Crim
ConLaw
Property
Got some feedback last semester on which of my classes would be good to work ahead on, and trying to figure out which of the following classes people would recommend I work ahead on (Working based on the advice by Ken in his Success in Law School post where he says to work ahead in one of your classes):
Crim
ConLaw
Property
- 3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
This isn't just gunnerish. It's dumb.
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: Class to read ahead in
http://www.top-law-schools.com/success- ... chool.html
Thanks for the extremely helpful feedback you provided.
Thanks for the extremely helpful feedback you provided.
- sap
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:16 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
First, I wouldn't read ahead in classes in general, but if you want to, I'd do it in Crim first, then ConLaw, then Property not at all. Property is fairly different from the caselaw stuff. It's more like CivPro than torts, but even rulesier than CivPro. A lot of it is about rote classification, and while it's definitely doable to teach yourself that stuff correctly, it's also possible to get in the habit of classifying things incorrectly, which would be very bad.
I'd read Crim first because most people find it confusing, but it's fairly linear - there aren't a lot of doctrinal shifts that make one test basically completely useless. In ConLaw, there are phases where the Court does one thing, and then about 50 years later, it does the opposite thing, and this isn't just true for one or two doctrines - it's prettymuch every aspect of ConLaw that has this kind of switch. If you read Crim, you won't confuse yourself with which is the right test for which era as much, since there just isn't that much there. The tests get refined or expanded, but usually not fundamentally reversed. There is also a lot of value to really knowing the details - very small shifts in the facts can get vastly different results under exactly the same tests (like Tyson/Edmunds, which are about whether you are allowed to execute people for murders not committed by them that occurred during a crime they were involved in). So getting really familiar with the facts of cases could be fairly helpful.
I'd read Crim first because most people find it confusing, but it's fairly linear - there aren't a lot of doctrinal shifts that make one test basically completely useless. In ConLaw, there are phases where the Court does one thing, and then about 50 years later, it does the opposite thing, and this isn't just true for one or two doctrines - it's prettymuch every aspect of ConLaw that has this kind of switch. If you read Crim, you won't confuse yourself with which is the right test for which era as much, since there just isn't that much there. The tests get refined or expanded, but usually not fundamentally reversed. There is also a lot of value to really knowing the details - very small shifts in the facts can get vastly different results under exactly the same tests (like Tyson/Edmunds, which are about whether you are allowed to execute people for murders not committed by them that occurred during a crime they were involved in). So getting really familiar with the facts of cases could be fairly helpful.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Class to read ahead in
I don't understand how you've finished an entire semester of law school and haven't figured out how worthless reading cases is.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
What benefit does reading ahead offer?
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: Class to read ahead in
Shouldve clarified, read ahead in supplements.Mal Reynolds wrote:I don't understand how you've finished an entire semester of law school and haven't figured out how worthless reading cases is.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
I don't get how supplements are even helpful. They always include way too much shit that your prof doesn't teach. Prepping with supps sounds even dumber to me than reading ahead.KD35 wrote:Shouldve clarified, read ahead in supplements.Mal Reynolds wrote:I don't understand how you've finished an entire semester of law school and haven't figured out how worthless reading cases is.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Class to read ahead in
I don't understand how you can be this clueless about how to spend your time after an entire semester of law school.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
lol some people started outlining the weekend after new years in my school.Mal Reynolds wrote:I don't understand how you can be this clueless about how to spend your time after an entire semester of law school.
- sap
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:16 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
This. Supplements are long.Desert Fox wrote:I don't get how supplements are even helpful. They always include way too much shit that your prof doesn't teach. Prepping with supps sounds even dumber to me than reading ahead.KD35 wrote:Shouldve clarified, read ahead in supplements.Mal Reynolds wrote:I don't understand how you've finished an entire semester of law school and haven't figured out how worthless reading cases is.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BluePurgatory
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:43 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
All of them. If you haven't worked through at least one supplement and half a hornbook by february then have fun below median.
- Stringer6
- Posts: 5919
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:45 am
Re: Class to read ahead in
Revelation: read only the stuff your professor teachesDesert Fox wrote:I don't get how supplements are even helpful. They always include way too much shit that your prof doesn't teach. Prepping with supps sounds even dumber to me than reading ahead.KD35 wrote:Shouldve clarified, read ahead in supplements.Mal Reynolds wrote:I don't understand how you've finished an entire semester of law school and haven't figured out how worthless reading cases is.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
I guess I assumed he didn't have a syllabus yet, but that's not necessarily true.Stringer6 wrote:Revelation: read only the stuff your professor teachesDesert Fox wrote:I don't get how supplements are even helpful. They always include way too much shit that your prof doesn't teach. Prepping with supps sounds even dumber to me than reading ahead.KD35 wrote:Shouldve clarified, read ahead in supplements.Mal Reynolds wrote:I don't understand how you've finished an entire semester of law school and haven't figured out how worthless reading cases is.
- OutCold
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:57 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
As the others have said, it's pretty pointless to try to get ahead over the break. If you absolutely can't contain yourself, a better solution is to get your hands on good outlines from last year for as many of the classes as you can. Hell, you don't even need to read anything else the entire semester if you find the right ones. Read those if you have to read something... At least you'll learn exactly what will be taught down to the gritty details. Professors never change their schtick from year to year in 1L classes. That right there is the best use of your time.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:50 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
Reading ahead is dumb. You want the material to be FRESH in your head when you cover it in class, like "I read this last night or today" fresh. You're working harder but not smarter. You have plenty to read within the class schedule, conserve your energy.
And for christ's sake, don't work over winter break. Recuperate, re-energize. Work when you go back.
And for christ's sake, don't work over winter break. Recuperate, re-energize. Work when you go back.
-
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:05 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
Okay, I'll bite because I've got the "answer the question and then say 'but'" strategy ingrained in me. ConLaw, because I find that reading cases more than once is helpful for me. Likely certain cases will repeat across casebooks.
Read, but only do it if you want to. I honestly would spend time on YouTube looking up cat videos.
Read, but only do it if you want to. I honestly would spend time on YouTube looking up cat videos.
-
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:13 am
Re: Class to read ahead in
It depends on how your professor teaches, how clear the casebook/syllabus is about what you should read and focus on, and whether your professor does the cold-call system or if he tells you ahead of time when you're going to be on call. If there are cold-calls, then reading closer to the time that the class occurs is preferable.
I read ahead in Con Law and in Property.
I read ahead in Con Law and in Property.
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:19 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
please enjoy your break. you are stressing me out with your ridiculousness.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Black Hat
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:56 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
Agreed. If you are 30-40 pages ahead the information that you are going over today you may have read a week ago. Not only is it not as fresh in your head but you may have misunderstood what exactly you were supposed to take away from the assignment in general.3|ink wrote:This isn't just gunnerish. It's dumb.
Don't do it.
- brotherdarkness
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:11 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
.
Last edited by brotherdarkness on Sat Jun 28, 2014 12:37 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am
Re: Class to read ahead in
Do not read ahead. It's a waste of time. Keep up to date with reading during the semester, work on outlines, do practice problems, and ask profs during office hours if you have questions.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Class to read ahead in
Meh. Everyone's different. I finished reading for property by the end of February and never prepped for class. I bet I spent less total time on the subject than most of my classmates.Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:Do not read ahead. It's a waste of time.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login