Reinhardt wrote:Lol at me. Slept only 5 hours and skipped breakfast to cram ca evidence and civ pro. Still happy they didn't show though
I stayed up to study civ pro, had a nightmare about getting CA civ pro, woke up and crammed some CA evidence distinctions.
Got an intentional torts essay that I haven't looked at intentional torts since 1L.
I heard people wrote negligence. Hoping enough do to make up for my shitty remedies on that. Compensatory and Ejectment were about all I got. Had a treatise on intentional torts but for causation, discussion of scope of intent, and transferred intent.
Made up a cause of action for intentional interference with water rights
Brought up specific performance to make D remove the trees only to dismiss it.
I wrote more remedies in the damn Ks essay. Constructive Tust and Equitable Lien as substitute remedies if he was insolvent. I should have copy pasted that to torts just to have something.
Wills seemed cake. Could argue harmless error on witnesses not seeing each other sign but don't matter anyway since would have validated with a valid holo codicil anyway.
No facts for undue influence on the friend interested witness so just brought it up and dismissed with a short analysis of presumption and no facts. Did some shit analysis about no facts whether he adopted stepson or not but regardless extrinsic evidence to prove who he was and also say he had contemplated post W disposition with codicil but didn't take stepson out of will so he'd still take