so in gasperini
they analyze what the state law does first, then what the issue at hand is to my knowledge. and the opposing federal law is seventh amendment, i believe?
why is gasperini relevant to HANNA development?
the state law governed the damages which P could get.
1) substantive: cap damages; 2) procedural: standard of review (i have no idea why this is procedural)
i just dont really get the overall significance of this case. could anyone help?
(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
1 post • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:45 pm