Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
SKlei
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:01 pm

Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

Postby SKlei » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:21 pm

Does anyone know if there is a big difference between the 3rd and 4th edition of this supplement? was thinking of buying the 3rd edition, but not sure if thats the best idea.

User avatar
LetsGoLAW
Posts: 372
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:07 pm

Re: Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

Postby LetsGoLAW » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:28 pm

SKlei wrote:Does anyone know if there is a big difference between the 3rd and 4th edition of this supplement? was thinking of buying the 3rd edition, but not sure if thats the best idea.


3rd is fine.

lawyerdown27
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:21 pm

Re: Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

Postby lawyerdown27 » Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:01 am

3rd is fine. Off the top of my head, you'll only be missing complete info on a couple of habeas cases.

waxecstatic
Posts: 314
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:07 pm

Re: Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

Postby waxecstatic » Thu Mar 14, 2013 5:14 pm

I'd imagine you'd miss the Sebellius case, which your class would probably cover, but you could simply get that case off Westlaw or LexisNexis.

User avatar
Nelson
Posts: 2061
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am

Re: Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

Postby Nelson » Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:17 pm

waxecstatic wrote:I'd imagine you'd miss the Sebellius case, which your class would probably cover, but you could simply get that case off Westlaw or LexisNexis.

NFIB v. Sebelius isn't in the 4th edition either since it came out in 2011.

portaprokoss
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:40 pm

Re: Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

Postby portaprokoss » Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:05 pm

This is seriously much better than Chemerinsky:

http://www.amazon.com/Sum-Substance-Aud ... supplement

I know it's sacrilegious to say something like this, but Chemerinsky is way more than you need.

MrsPalsgraf
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

Postby MrsPalsgraf » Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:17 pm

I have both and I know the standing section is different because recent cases have changed the analysis

lawyerdown27
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:21 pm

Re: Chemerinsky Con Law Supplement Question

Postby lawyerdown27 » Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:04 pm

This is seriously much better than Chemerinsky:

--LinkRemoved-- ... supplement

I know it's sacrilegious to say something like this, but Chemerinsky is way more than you need.


Agreed to a certain extent-I used these to supplement my outline, but I also used Chemerinsky for the same purpose. You don't need to read Chemerinsky straight through or anything. Instead, just go look up where he discusses the cases and make sure you have the important points he makes in your outline. Also, our Con Law exam was open book, so I tabbed up Chemerinsky and referred to it a couple times during the exam.




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: lakers3, tedofsandimas, wittywitless and 8 guests