Berryman v. Komach: Option Contracts & Promissory Estoppel

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
echooo23
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:29 pm

Berryman v. Komach: Option Contracts & Promissory Estoppel

Postby echooo23 » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:07 pm

I'm trying to glean the rule from Berryman v. Kmoch. Can someone help? Option contracts must be supported by consideration. If no monetary consideration, then part performance in reliance may be valid consideration? However, the consideration must be to the benefit of the optionor? Not clear on where this motive v. consideration and binding promise v. illusory promise thing comes in.

User avatar
Jsa725
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: Berryman v. Komach: Option Contracts & Promissory Estoppel

Postby Jsa725 » Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:50 pm

.




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: monceau, woodselle and 11 guests