What does this mean (torts)?

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
splittermcsplit88
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 10:40 pm

What does this mean (torts)?

Postby splittermcsplit88 » Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:49 pm

"Both ways rule"
- Exceptions to the general rule that contributory negligence cannot be imputed.
- If the negligence of a third person would have been imputed to a person as a defendant, then the negligence would be imputed to the person as a plaintiff.

User avatar
gdane
Posts: 12394
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: What does this mean (torts)?

Postby gdane » Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:32 pm

This usually comes up in vicarious liability situations. An example would be an employee that drives a company car and gets into an accident. If the employer sues the other driver, the employer's damages will be reduced by the percentage of fault (negligence) attributable to the employee. Why? Because if the employer was the D in the suit, the company (not the employee) would have been liable for the accident under a vicarious liability theory (assuming the employee was doing something he was supposed to be doing, etc).




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: LawHammer, Stubbazubba, wg6524 and 18 guests