2-207 (2)(a) question Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
beta

Bronze
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:59 pm

2-207 (2)(a) question

Post by beta » Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:48 pm

under 2-207 (2)(a), if an OFFEROR limits acceptance to its terms, and an acceptance adds terms--is there no K because the acceptance is a counteroffer? or the additional terms just don't come in?

thanks in advance :)

nyg22

New
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 2:31 am

Re: 2-207 (2)(a) question

Post by nyg22 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:53 pm

If you are in 2-207(2), there is ALWAYS a K.

So the analysis would be - there is a K on agreed terms according to (1). Any additional or different terms fall out because of offeror's limitation on acceptance. Also, this only applies to contracts "between merchants", as any additional terms would be proposals if not between merchants. Although, the result would be the same as the limitation would negate any proposal.

User avatar
beta

Bronze
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:59 pm

Re: 2-207 (2)(a) question

Post by beta » Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:09 pm

ok that's what i thought. thanks!

Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”