BuckinghamB wrote:mephistopheles wrote:honest question, but can you please describe said gunners
It just seems like political dispositions very obviously color some people's opinions on things, which is fine until the arguments devolve into something that really isn't very law-related. I guess that would be what I consider a gunner (though not necessarily gunning for grades). It's really not that bad at all in my class, but people definitely seem to get more riled up/confrontational in conlaw more than any other class I've had. See, e.g. the ACA case.
yeah, i never really understood when people brought up arguments (opinions, really) that weren't grounded in the law. it's laughable how little it contributes to the discussion.