Negligence, Standard of Care for Children and Proximate Caus

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
dsb83
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm

Negligence, Standard of Care for Children and Proximate Caus

Postby dsb83 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:21 pm

Wasn't sure where to go with this for a quick answer so I thought why not here. Any suggestions on forums/website more geared to law school class questions are welcome.

My question is if a child is determined to be negligent using the appropriate standard of care for children, for the foreseeability test for proximate cause, do you look at what was foreseeable for a child or the normal standard of foreseeability? Thanks.

kingofdara
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:49 am

Re: Negligence, Standard of Care for Children and Proximate Caus

Postby kingofdara » Fri Oct 26, 2012 12:34 am

It's section 10 of the Restatement (Third):

§ 10. Children

(a) A child's conduct is negligent if it does not conform to that of a reasonably careful person of the same age, intelligence, and experience, except as provided in Subsection (b) or (c).
(b) A child less than five years of age is incapable of negligence.
(c) The special rule in Subsection (a) does not apply when the child is engaging in a dangerous activity that is characteristically undertaken by adults.

But you'll want to know what your professor says the law is.

In my Torts class we read Stevens v. Veenstra, which was about a student driver who got into a car accident.

User avatar
Lawquacious
Posts: 2037
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am

Re: Negligence, Standard of Care for Children and Proximate Caus

Postby Lawquacious » Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:08 am

What's Proximate Caus?










(kidding, kidding)




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cavalier1138 and 8 guests