How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School? Forum
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
A tale of two laws schools: I was a splitter for school A (shitty GPA and LSAT significantly higher than median). Owned 1L (top 5%) and transferred to a T10 where my GPA was well below the median. Proceeded to do about median, if not a bit below at school B. For some people, it makes a difference. And I didn't slack off at school B or revert to my old study habits.
- PDaddy
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
I would suspect that reverse-splitters would perform better than splitters, because one's LSAT score purports to predict whether or not you can do the work, while your GPA purports to measure whether you are willing to do the work.heeloftar wrote:I don't even really know where to look for data on this, so perhaps personal anecdotes will assuage my curiosity.
How do splitters do once they are actually in law school? I'd imagine that it's a bit of a bi-modal distribution, with some people who finally grew up and worked hard in law school (resulting in success), and another group of people carrying their laziness and self-entitlement with them to law school (resulting in poor grades).
Also, what about reverse splitters? It would seem to me that reverse splitters would follow a more natural distribution, as a lot of times reverse splitters are just victims of test-taking anxiety.
The LSAT is a controversial measurement tool that has proven to be largely ineffective, on its own. Lots of students perform poorly on the LSAT but do well in law school, while the slackers with the high LSAT's probably tend to slack in law school as well as their careers. If given a choice between students with high GPA's or high LSAT's, but not both (and all else being held equal), I would pick the former.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:46 am
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
The major disclaimer here is that there are plenty of schools where someone who is both a slacker and an idiot can still earn a decent gpaPDaddy wrote:I would suspect that reverse-splitters would perform better than splitters, because one's LSAT score purports to predict whether or not you can do the work, while your GPA purports to measure whether you are willing to do the work.heeloftar wrote:I don't even really know where to look for data on this, so perhaps personal anecdotes will assuage my curiosity.
How do splitters do once they are actually in law school? I'd imagine that it's a bit of a bi-modal distribution, with some people who finally grew up and worked hard in law school (resulting in success), and another group of people carrying their laziness and self-entitlement with them to law school (resulting in poor grades).
Also, what about reverse splitters? It would seem to me that reverse splitters would follow a more natural distribution, as a lot of times reverse splitters are just victims of test-taking anxiety.
The LSAT is a controversial measurement tool that has proven to be largely ineffective, on its own. Lots of students perform poorly on the LSAT but do well in law school, while the slackers with the high LSAT's probably tend to slack in law school as well as their careers. If given a choice between students with high GPA's or high LSAT's, but not both (and all else being held equal), I would pick the former.
- ilovesf
- Posts: 12837
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
I'm not a splitter for TLS, but I was for my school. I was far under the 25% for the GPA, and at the 75% for the LSAT. I did pretty well (12%). Being a splitter means nothing, because people can be separated from their GPAs by years. I didn't study AT ALL in UG, and now I study a lot. Habits change.
- Flips88
- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
Reverse splitter. 25%ile LSAT, >75% GPA. Did well.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
Lots of splitters and reverse splitters do well. Lots of splitters and reverse splitters do fine. Lots of splitters and reverse splitters do shitty. I haven't noticed any trends in either direction. Maybe mattered more when there was more variation within a class, but all the top schools have tightened up to quite narrow LSAT ranges.
If I were going to go around making predictions though, I would say it helps to not go through anything like an emotionally wrenching breakup or the death of a parent.
But I do always appreciate threads like these to out the douchebags who can't help but take advantage of the opportunity to brag in the name of being a data point.
If I were going to go around making predictions though, I would say it helps to not go through anything like an emotionally wrenching breakup or the death of a parent.
But I do always appreciate threads like these to out the douchebags who can't help but take advantage of the opportunity to brag in the name of being a data point.
- ben4847
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:38 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
In law school, splitters tend to have horrible GPA's, but do really well on the bar.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
If by horrible GPAs you mean horrible UG GPAs, I agree whole-heartedly.ben4847 wrote:In law school, splitters tend to have horrible GPA's, but do really well on the bar.
- howell
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:57 am
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
It would be interesting to see the data on this. My guess is that splitters would do slightly better than reverse splitters as a whole, because UGPA has a much broader meaning. What school? What major? At least with the LSAT, the test is essentially the same across the board, no matter the student's approach (caring/not caring, prepared/unprepared, current life drama, etc.). I also feel that I have used the skills that it takes to succeed on the LSAT more than the skills I would have learned from actually having a decent GPA, although there is a lot to be said for knowing how to study.
At the individual level, this is going to be all over the place. The level of "reform" mentioned earlier in the thread matters. An engineering student with no intentions of attending law school who 7 years later decides to start studying for the LSAT and go to law school is going to be a different animal than someone who skated through an education major at East Bumblefuck U. The background stories of people will make a huge difference. Some people just walk into the LSAT and take it without significant prep. Someone who winds up with a 4.0/159 because they had never needed to prepare for a standardized test in their life is going to "outperform" that LSAT score.
At the individual level, this is going to be all over the place. The level of "reform" mentioned earlier in the thread matters. An engineering student with no intentions of attending law school who 7 years later decides to start studying for the LSAT and go to law school is going to be a different animal than someone who skated through an education major at East Bumblefuck U. The background stories of people will make a huge difference. Some people just walk into the LSAT and take it without significant prep. Someone who winds up with a 4.0/159 because they had never needed to prepare for a standardized test in their life is going to "outperform" that LSAT score.
-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 6:28 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
I went to a crappy UG because it was free. My GPA was median and my LSAT was 75% for my T2 school. I finished #1. Then again, I didn't try in UG, but I did in law school. Also, I have no idea how the LSAT is relevant on a daily basis in law school. I was also waitlisted at my school before I retook the LSAT, but I doubt I wouldn't have finished with the same rank if I were admitted the first time. The LSAT measures how well you take a random test with random subjects. In LS, you get to focus and learn what issues will be tested on an exam. Don't count on your LSAT score to push you through.
If you are committed to learning the material, figuring out what you need to study, doing the work, and conveying it well on paper, you will do well.
If you are committed to learning the material, figuring out what you need to study, doing the work, and conveying it well on paper, you will do well.
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:42 am
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
...
Last edited by jimmythecatdied6 on Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:34 am
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQ3qj1ethFE&t=0m59s?jimmythecatdied6 wrote:No more phish references? Come on...
- Icculus
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0L_-OTHz6oFlanSolo wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQ3qj1ethFE&t=0m59s?jimmythecatdied6 wrote:No more phish references? Come on...
Probably my favorite from the 2011 tour. NYE Madison Square Garden, best way to spend new year's eve.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JoeFish
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:43 am
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
You make these two statements like they're opposite... but aren't they really saying the same thing?canesfan1986 wrote:The LSAT measures how well you take a random test with random subjects. In LS, you get to focus and learn what issues will be tested on an exam.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 2:48 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
As a point of reference I am a splitter, much higher GPA than LSAT. However, my practice tests were always in the high/mid-170s. On the exam, my score was disappointedly in the upper-mid 160s. Good enough for a T-10, but not the right score for H/Y. If not for the much higher practice scores, I would have questioned if LS was a good fit.
As a 1L I ended up at median. Without exception, I thought I had nailed every exam . . . not so. I have a handful of Bs, a few B+ and a couple A-. Disappointed not to have any As, but glad about not having anything lower than a B. I do not know if my results are “typical splitter,” or not.
As a 1L I ended up at median. Without exception, I thought I had nailed every exam . . . not so. I have a handful of Bs, a few B+ and a couple A-. Disappointed not to have any As, but glad about not having anything lower than a B. I do not know if my results are “typical splitter,” or not.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
TBF, most people at those schools are (a) smart, (b) accustomed to getting decent grades, and (c) not used to being graded on a curve. I think the last factor gives engineering/hard science majors a distinct advantage, even though their UG grades are more prone to being on the lower side. Either way, median at a T10 is respectable--not bragworthy--but certainly decent.McQueen wrote:As a point of reference I am a splitter, much higher GPA than LSAT. However, my practice tests were always in the high/mid-170s. On the exam, my score was disappointedly in the upper-mid 160s. Good enough for a T-10, but not the right score for H/Y. If not for the much higher practice scores, I would have questioned if LS was a good fit.
As a 1L I ended up at median. Without exception, I thought I had nailed every exam . . . not so. I have a handful of Bs, a few B+ and a couple A-. Disappointed not to have any As, but glad about not having anything lower than a B. I do not know if my results are “typical splitter,” or not.
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:59 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
ClarDarr wrote:I was a reverse splitter and finished 1L in the top 5 students in my class.
Isn't that rare?
Congratulations either way!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
Except LSAT correlates better with LS GPA than does UGPA.PDaddy wrote:I would suspect that reverse-splitters would perform better than splitters, because one's LSAT score purports to predict whether or not you can do the work, while your GPA purports to measure whether you are willing to do the work.heeloftar wrote:I don't even really know where to look for data on this, so perhaps personal anecdotes will assuage my curiosity.
How do splitters do once they are actually in law school? I'd imagine that it's a bit of a bi-modal distribution, with some people who finally grew up and worked hard in law school (resulting in success), and another group of people carrying their laziness and self-entitlement with them to law school (resulting in poor grades).
Also, what about reverse splitters? It would seem to me that reverse splitters would follow a more natural distribution, as a lot of times reverse splitters are just victims of test-taking anxiety.
The LSAT is a controversial measurement tool that has proven to be largely ineffective, on its own. Lots of students perform poorly on the LSAT but do well in law school, while the slackers with the high LSAT's probably tend to slack in law school as well as their careers. If given a choice between students with high GPA's or high LSAT's, but not both (and all else being held equal), I would pick the former.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
For sure. Only 5% of a given law school class will end up in the top 5%.PolySuyGuy wrote:ClarDarr wrote:I was a reverse splitter and finished 1L in the top 5 students in my class.
Isn't that rare?
Congratulations either way!
But seriously, people who think there's a sizable difference in potential between run-of-the-mill splitters and reverse splitters need to take a statistics course.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
Bolded is suuuuper meaningless, primarily because in many engineering programs, a guy in the top 5% is going to have a GPA below a 3.6.HeavenWood wrote:TBF, most people at those schools are (a) smart, (b) accustomed to getting decent grades, and (c) not used to being graded on a curve. I think the last factor gives engineering/hard science majors a distinct advantage, even though their UG grades are more prone to being on the lower side. Either way, median at a T10 is respectable--not bragworthy--but certainly decent.McQueen wrote:As a point of reference I am a splitter, much higher GPA than LSAT. However, my practice tests were always in the high/mid-170s. On the exam, my score was disappointedly in the upper-mid 160s. Good enough for a T-10, but not the right score for H/Y. If not for the much higher practice scores, I would have questioned if LS was a good fit.
As a 1L I ended up at median. Without exception, I thought I had nailed every exam . . . not so. I have a handful of Bs, a few B+ and a couple A-. Disappointed not to have any As, but glad about not having anything lower than a B. I do not know if my results are “typical splitter,” or not.
Besides that, I seriously doubt that most humanities majors, with 4.0s or 2.0s, would have been able to even complete an engineering degree.
- Perseus_I
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:24 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
The reason why this thread is retarded is because it doesn't account for multiple LSATs. Some people just take the LSAT once and do poorly. Some people take it multiple times and do well. Maybe splitters are more likely to study for the LSAT than non-splitters. Who knows?
I took the LSAT once. Bombed: I was a reverse splitter. I took the LSAT again. Suddenly, I was a splitter at a few schools and neither a splitter nor a reverse splitter everywhere else.
I took the LSAT once. Bombed: I was a reverse splitter. I took the LSAT again. Suddenly, I was a splitter at a few schools and neither a splitter nor a reverse splitter everywhere else.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
That's why I said they have an advantage. Getting that top 5% 3.6 is a lot more meaningful than a 4.0 in a humanities major where the lack of grading curve/general grading culture makes everyone get A's.IAFG wrote:Bolded is suuuuper meaningless, primarily because in many engineering programs, a guy in the top 5% is going to have a GPA below a 3.6.HeavenWood wrote:TBF, most people at those schools are (a) smart, (b) accustomed to getting decent grades, and (c) not used to being graded on a curve. I think the last factor gives engineering/hard science majors a distinct advantage, even though their UG grades are more prone to being on the lower side. Either way, median at a T10 is respectable--not bragworthy--but certainly decent.McQueen wrote:As a point of reference I am a splitter, much higher GPA than LSAT. However, my practice tests were always in the high/mid-170s. On the exam, my score was disappointedly in the upper-mid 160s. Good enough for a T-10, but not the right score for H/Y. If not for the much higher practice scores, I would have questioned if LS was a good fit.
As a 1L I ended up at median. Without exception, I thought I had nailed every exam . . . not so. I have a handful of Bs, a few B+ and a couple A-. Disappointed not to have any As, but glad about not having anything lower than a B. I do not know if my results are “typical splitter,” or not.
Besides that, I seriously doubt that most humanities majors, with 4.0s or 2.0s, would have been able to even complete an engineering degree.
As far as my tiny pink liberal arts degree goes, I probably would have been fine with engineering math, but I would have definitely been fucked with science.
Last edited by HeavenWood on Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
Clearly your IQ jumped 10 points in the interim.Perseus_I wrote:The reason why this thread is retarded is because it doesn't account for multiple LSATs. Some people just take the LSAT once and do poorly. Some people take it multiple times and do well. Maybe splitters are more likely to study for the LSAT than non-splitters. Who knows?
I took the LSAT once. Bombed: I was a reverse splitter. I took the LSAT again. Suddenly, I was a splitter at a few schools and neither a splitter nor a reverse splitter everywhere else.
- manofjustice
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 10:01 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
Okay.IAFG wrote:Bolded is suuuuper meaningless, primarily because in many engineering programs, a guy in the top 5% is going to have a GPA below a 3.6.HeavenWood wrote:TBF, most people at those schools are (a) smart, (b) accustomed to getting decent grades, and (c) not used to being graded on a curve. I think the last factor gives engineering/hard science majors a distinct advantage, even though their UG grades are more prone to being on the lower side. Either way, median at a T10 is respectable--not bragworthy--but certainly decent.McQueen wrote:As a point of reference I am a splitter, much higher GPA than LSAT. However, my practice tests were always in the high/mid-170s. On the exam, my score was disappointedly in the upper-mid 160s. Good enough for a T-10, but not the right score for H/Y. If not for the much higher practice scores, I would have questioned if LS was a good fit.
As a 1L I ended up at median. Without exception, I thought I had nailed every exam . . . not so. I have a handful of Bs, a few B+ and a couple A-. Disappointed not to have any As, but glad about not having anything lower than a B. I do not know if my results are “typical splitter,” or not.
Besides that, I seriously doubt that most humanities majors, with 4.0s or 2.0s, would have been able to even complete an engineering degree.
- Perseus_I
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:24 pm
Re: How do Splitters Perform Once in Law School?
Unless there is a huge--I mean huge--discrepancy in SAT/ACT math scores between humanities majors and engineering majors, this is an unwarranted assumption.manofjustice wrote:Okay.IAFG wrote:Bolded is suuuuper meaningless, primarily because in many engineering programs, a guy in the top 5% is going to have a GPA below a 3.6.HeavenWood wrote:TBF, most people at those schools are (a) smart, (b) accustomed to getting decent grades, and (c) not used to being graded on a curve. I think the last factor gives engineering/hard science majors a distinct advantage, even though their UG grades are more prone to being on the lower side. Either way, median at a T10 is respectable--not bragworthy--but certainly decent.McQueen wrote:As a point of reference I am a splitter, much higher GPA than LSAT. However, my practice tests were always in the high/mid-170s. On the exam, my score was disappointedly in the upper-mid 160s. Good enough for a T-10, but not the right score for H/Y. If not for the much higher practice scores, I would have questioned if LS was a good fit.
As a 1L I ended up at median. Without exception, I thought I had nailed every exam . . . not so. I have a handful of Bs, a few B+ and a couple A-. Disappointed not to have any As, but glad about not having anything lower than a B. I do not know if my results are “typical splitter,” or not.
Besides that, I seriously doubt that most humanities majors, with 4.0s or 2.0s, would have been able to even complete an engineering degree.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login