Torts - Duty for Pure Economic Harm Q

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
TFR
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:56 pm

Torts - Duty for Pure Economic Harm Q

Postby TFR » Thu May 03, 2012 11:16 am

If D is let say a property owner, with a duty to P as an invitee, and X a robber comes onto D's property and takes a wad of cash from P, or otherwise causes economic harm to P, but no emotional or physical harm.

Assuming D had a duty and was the proximate cause, is this pure economic harm, where generally D would have no duty to protect against?

How do you analyze such a situation?

User avatar
DocHawkeye
Posts: 640
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:22 am

Re: Torts - Duty for Pure Economic Harm Q

Postby DocHawkeye » Thu May 03, 2012 11:23 am

TFR wrote:If D is let say a property owner, with a duty to P as an invitee, and X a robber comes onto D's property and takes a wad of cash from P, or otherwise causes economic harm to P, but no emotional or physical harm.

Assuming D had a duty and was the proximate cause, is this pure economic harm, where generally D would have no duty to protect against?

How do you analyze such a situation?


This is not a pure economic loss, this would be loss of property. Think of pure economic loss as the loss of potential gain.




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests