.

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
Kikero
Posts: 1208
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am

Re: .

Postby Kikero » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:19 pm

beachbum wrote:
chrispronger wrote:One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.


This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.

On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?


+1

User avatar
chrispronger
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:12 pm

Re: .

Postby chrispronger » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:23 pm

beachbum wrote:
chrispronger wrote:One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.


This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.

On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?


I'm on it. Nice study break :)

User avatar
shredderrrrrr
Posts: 4673
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am

Re: .

Postby shredderrrrrr » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:29 pm

chrispronger wrote:
beachbum wrote:
chrispronger wrote:One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.


This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.

On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?


I'm on it. Nice study break :)


Hell yeah.

User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: .

Postby beachbum » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:30 pm

hah, well now I wish more Duke students would see this. There's a few people in my section who post on TLS; I'm sure they'd find this interesting.

User avatar
kalvano
Posts: 11720
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: .

Postby kalvano » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:33 pm

What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: .

Postby rad lulz » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:40 pm

kalvano wrote:What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

I had no idea how to answer it.

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:42 pm

In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.

Further narrowing it down:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=155113&start=25

You can assume they have relatively strong knowledge of DC, maybe a local of DC and probably white.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=152527&start=125

Definitely a guy since he refers to his "tiny dick" and how he is going to "study" so hard. Also, definitely someone big law focused.

LOL @ people thinking they are anonymous on this site.

User avatar
Ludo!
Posts: 4764
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm

Re: .

Postby Ludo! » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:43 pm

rad lulz wrote:
kalvano wrote:What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

I had no idea how to answer it.


I didn't either. I seem to forget everything I knew about a law school subject immediately after I take the exam.

User avatar
kalvano
Posts: 11720
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: .

Postby kalvano » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:44 pm

rad lulz wrote:
kalvano wrote:What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

I had no idea how to answer it.


I'm studying for Con Law II right now, and it's a good question that requires some thought, but a few pages of Chemerinsky would easily set you on the right path.

User avatar
Always Credited
Posts: 2509
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm

Re: .

Postby Always Credited » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:46 pm

Morgan12Oak wrote:In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.

Further narrowing it down:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=155113&start=25

You can assume they have relatively strong knowledge of DC, maybe a local of DC and probably white.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=152527&start=125

Definitely a guy since he refers to his "tiny dick" and how he is going to "study" so hard. Also, definitely someone big law focused.

LOL @ people thinking they are anonymous on this site.


Shit just got weird

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: .

Postby rad lulz » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:47 pm

kalvano wrote:
rad lulz wrote:
kalvano wrote:What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

I had no idea how to answer it.


I'm studying for Con Law II right now, and it's a good question that requires some thought, but a few pages of Chemerinsky would easily set you on the right path.

Ahh if it's a conlaw II type question, then I have no idea. I only took I. Basically no individual rights.

User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: .

Postby beachbum » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:54 pm

Morgan12Oak wrote:In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.


Nah, we can narrow it down to one. Two sections were in this particular class together, and this person definitely wasn't in my section (which took the final first).

User avatar
stillwater
Posts: 3811
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: .

Postby stillwater » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:57 pm

I wonder what the OP is doing right now: drawing the shades, unplugging his internet router, fashioning a mustache disguise...

User avatar
PitchO20
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:35 pm

Re: .

Postby PitchO20 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:58 pm

OP seems like a dick.

User avatar
Always Credited
Posts: 2509
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm

Re: .

Postby Always Credited » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:59 pm

stillwater wrote:I wonder what the OP is doing right now: drawing the shades, unplugging his internet router, fashioning a mustache disguise...


Probably asking people on another forum how to defend against charges of academic dishonesty in law school

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:59 pm

PitchO20 wrote:OP seems like a dick.


A self-proclaimed tiny one in fact

User avatar
Ludo!
Posts: 4764
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm

Re: .

Postby Ludo! » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:59 pm

honestapplicant wrote:
I'm not assuming that I'm guaranteed biglaw at all. I know I'm going to have to study my tiny dick off to get it.


well start asking the ladies of Duke and see if you can figure out who this guy is

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: .

Postby rad lulz » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:00 pm

* waits for OP to make the argument that TLS is not a "sentient being" *

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:01 pm

I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves

User avatar
Lawl Shcool
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: .

Postby Lawl Shcool » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:03 pm

Morgan12Oak wrote:I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves


Where'd you get racist?

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:05 pm

See viewtopic.php?f=1&t=155113&start=25

He got banned for a relatively racist comment for a week from TLS talking about the poor minorities apparently

User avatar
shredderrrrrr
Posts: 4673
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am

Re: .

Postby shredderrrrrr » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:05 pm

I feel slightly sadistic for finding so much pleasure in OP's potential punishment...

ETA: After quoting the below comment, fuck it. I'll gladly watch that asshole get called out.
Last edited by shredderrrrrr on Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
shredderrrrrr
Posts: 4673
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am

Re: .

Postby shredderrrrrr » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:06 pm

Lawl Shcool wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves


Where'd you get racist?


honestapplicant wrote:Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood

User avatar
Lawl Shcool
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: .

Postby Lawl Shcool » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:10 pm

shredderrrrrr wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves


Where'd you get racist?


honestapplicant wrote:Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood


Ahhh now I see. Carry on.

User avatar
Always Credited
Posts: 2509
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm

Re: .

Postby Always Credited » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:16 pm

shredderrrrrr wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves


Where'd you get racist?


honestapplicant wrote:Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood


Image




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests