Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home		Law School
Admissions		Law
Schools		Law
Students		TLS
Forums		 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Students and Graduates » Forum for Law School Students

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 3 of 17
  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 17  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Kikero
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am
Posts: 1315
beachbum wrote:
chrispronger wrote:
One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.


This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.

On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?


+1
Top
 Profile  
 
chrispronger
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:12 pm
Posts: 19
beachbum wrote:
chrispronger wrote:
One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.


This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.

On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?


I'm on it. Nice study break :)
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6112
chrispronger wrote:
beachbum wrote:
chrispronger wrote:
One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.


This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.

On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?


I'm on it. Nice study break :)


Hell yeah.
Top
 Profile  
 
beachbum
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 2837
hah, well now I wish more Duke students would see this. There's a few people in my section who post on TLS; I'm sure they'd find this interesting.
Top
 Profile  
 
kalvano
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Posts: 11472
What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.
Top
 Profile  
 
rad lulz
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Posts: 9078
kalvano wrote:
What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

I had no idea how to answer it.
Top
 Profile  
 
Morgan12Oak
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Posts: 348
In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.

Further narrowing it down:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=155113&start=25

You can assume they have relatively strong knowledge of DC, maybe a local of DC and probably white.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=152527&start=125

Definitely a guy since he refers to his "tiny dick" and how he is going to "study" so hard. Also, definitely someone big law focused.

LOL @ people thinking they are anonymous on this site.
Top
 Profile  
 
Ludovico Technique
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:43 pm 
Offline
Pockets full of 180s
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Posts: 6625
rad lulz wrote:
kalvano wrote:
What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

I had no idea how to answer it.


I didn't either. I seem to forget everything I knew about a law school subject immediately after I take the exam.
Top
 Profile  
 
kalvano
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Posts: 11472
rad lulz wrote:
kalvano wrote:
What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

I had no idea how to answer it.


I'm studying for Con Law II right now, and it's a good question that requires some thought, but a few pages of Chemerinsky would easily set you on the right path.
Top
 Profile  
 
Always Credited
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:46 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 4434
Morgan12Oak wrote:
In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.

Further narrowing it down:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=155113&start=25

You can assume they have relatively strong knowledge of DC, maybe a local of DC and probably white.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=152527&start=125

Definitely a guy since he refers to his "tiny dick" and how he is going to "study" so hard. Also, definitely someone big law focused.

LOL @ people thinking they are anonymous on this site.


Shit just got weird
Top
 Profile  
 
rad lulz
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Posts: 9078
kalvano wrote:
rad lulz wrote:
kalvano wrote:
What I find most amusing is that the question really doesn't seem all that difficult.

I had no idea how to answer it.


I'm studying for Con Law II right now, and it's a good question that requires some thought, but a few pages of Chemerinsky would easily set you on the right path.

Ahh if it's a conlaw II type question, then I have no idea. I only took I. Basically no individual rights.
Top
 Profile  
 
beachbum
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 2837
Morgan12Oak wrote:
In my boredom, I decided to see how difficult it would be to figure out who this is. Assuming no one outright knows who it is already, you can already narrow it down to 2 sections in Duke's Con law class.


Nah, we can narrow it down to one. Two sections were in this particular class together, and this person definitely wasn't in my section (which took the final first).
Top
 Profile  
 
stillwater
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Posts: 2105
I wonder what the OP is doing right now: drawing the shades, unplugging his internet router, fashioning a mustache disguise...
Top
 Profile  
 
PitchO20
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:35 pm
Posts: 150
OP seems like a dick.
Top
 Profile  
 
Always Credited
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:59 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 4434
stillwater wrote:
I wonder what the OP is doing right now: drawing the shades, unplugging his internet router, fashioning a mustache disguise...


Probably asking people on another forum how to defend against charges of academic dishonesty in law school
Top
 Profile  
 
Morgan12Oak
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Posts: 348
PitchO20 wrote:
OP seems like a dick.


A self-proclaimed tiny one in fact
Top
 Profile  
 
Ludovico Technique
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:59 pm 
Offline
Pockets full of 180s
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Posts: 6625
honestapplicant wrote:

I'm not assuming that I'm guaranteed biglaw at all. I know I'm going to have to study my tiny dick off to get it.


well start asking the ladies of Duke and see if you can figure out who this guy is
Top
 Profile  
 
rad lulz
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Posts: 9078
* waits for OP to make the argument that TLS is not a "sentient being" *
Top
 Profile  
 
Morgan12Oak
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Posts: 348
I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves
Top
 Profile  
 
Lawl Shcool
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 803
Morgan12Oak wrote:
I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves


Where'd you get racist?
Top
 Profile  
 
Morgan12Oak
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Posts: 348
See viewtopic.php?f=1&t=155113&start=25

He got banned for a relatively racist comment for a week from TLS talking about the poor minorities apparently
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6112
I feel slightly sadistic for finding so much pleasure in OP's potential punishment...

ETA: After quoting the below comment, fuck it. I'll gladly watch that asshole get called out.


Last edited by shredderrrrrr on Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6112
Lawl Shcool wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves


Where'd you get racist?


honestapplicant wrote:
Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood
Top
 Profile  
 
Lawl Shcool
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 803
shredderrrrrr wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves


Where'd you get racist?


honestapplicant wrote:
Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood


Ahhh now I see. Carry on.
Top
 Profile  
 
Always Credited
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:16 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 4434
shredderrrrrr wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
I hope the professor sends out an e-mail asking for the racist with the tiny dick to self-identify themselves


Where'd you get racist?


honestapplicant wrote:
Damn right I would stay in the Mall/west of 18th street. Unlike the people who live east of 18th (aka poor minorities), I have a bright future. I'd rather not have it jeopardized by Tyrone from da hood


Image
Top
 Profile  
 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 3 of 17
  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 17  Next

Board index » Students and Graduates » Forum for Law School Students

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: eternalconrad, ilovelamp18, jellybean8, justcallmeit, mtyler19, Psib337, SoftScrub and 19 guests


Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB