Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:25 pm
Posts: 94
Unitas wrote:
ExAnt3 wrote:
katesearches wrote:
ilovesf wrote:
I mean how are they even going to find out who this guy is? "Um professor one of the 80 people in our class posted anonymously in an online forum asking a question about the exam." What are you going to do, do you guys want to take a whole new exam?


lol that sucks for ppl in his section


Yeah, I'd be surprised if they were able to figure out who he was. Such a shame.


:? It was likely done a few pages back...

But yeah this thread only had two good parts: the original post and the first response and when OP came back to quote TLS's terms of service to say how outing him to Duke would be a violations of the legal responsibilities of this site (maybe he should have put that much effort into his con law exam). After that it has gone downhill. Only two ways to make this thread even more legendary. Either Duke administrators post or OP returns. Everything else in this thread is just wasting space until either of those events occur.


Oh. I hadn't read the whole thread when I posted that. Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Posts: 15447
ExAnt3 wrote:
Unitas wrote:
:? It was likely done a few pages back...

But yeah this thread only had two good parts: the original post and the first response and when OP came back to quote TLS's terms of service to say how outing him to Duke would be a violations of the legal responsibilities of this site (maybe he should have put that much effort into his con law exam). After that it has gone downhill. Only two ways to make this thread even more legendary. Either Duke administrators post or OP returns. Everything else in this thread is just wasting space until either of those events occur.


Oh. I hadn't read the whole thread when I posted that. Awesome.

Awesome that he was outted? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:25 pm
Posts: 94
ilovesf wrote:
ExAnt3 wrote:
Unitas wrote:
:? It was likely done a few pages back...

But yeah this thread only had two good parts: the original post and the first response and when OP came back to quote TLS's terms of service to say how outing him to Duke would be a violations of the legal responsibilities of this site (maybe he should have put that much effort into his con law exam). After that it has gone downhill. Only two ways to make this thread even more legendary. Either Duke administrators post or OP returns. Everything else in this thread is just wasting space until either of those events occur.


Oh. I hadn't read the whole thread when I posted that. Awesome.

Awesome that he was outted? :roll:


Uh, yeah. Fuck that guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Posts: 21342
Where was he outted. I don't see i.t


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Posts: 15447
Desert Fox wrote:
Where was he outted. I don't see i.t

I don't think he actually was. They were talking about a possible school that maybe he attended, started talking about someone who fit the profile, then realized he was in a different section.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 2:33 pm
Posts: 903
Desert Fox wrote:
Where was he outted. I don't see i.t


it was quickly deleted...it was nice though, Pretty sure if anyone from Duke saw it, the guy was done.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Posts: 3092
thickfreakness wrote:
Image


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 2020
Google Cache will not be this kid's friend if Duke cares about this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Posts: 2669
JollyGreenGiant wrote:
Google Cache will not be this kid's friend if Duke cares about this.


TBH, I do feel bad for the poster. Sure, he/she should not have done that, but I'm sure many other people do google searches and other things which are still considered "cheating". @ Jolly How could Duke utilize Good Cache?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Posts: 21342
I don't see anything particularly damming in google. The name is too generic to automatically connect him to other sites.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:08 am
Posts: 15099
This thread does not seem to serve any further purpose beyond that of a witch-hunt, which is a little worrying because of the possibility of false identification, and is also generally against our no-outing policy. The mods have therefore decided to lock it down, and we will be shutting down any spin-offs.

While I recognize that this poster has done something monumentally stupid which brings into question both their character and intelligence, we place a high priority on the privacy of user info, and the poster in question has probably already experienced significant anxiety over the last few days; days in the middle of their 1L exam period. For now, that should be enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: t14retaker and 15 guests



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB