Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Posts: 1686
sundance95 wrote:
kwais wrote:
sundance95 wrote:
kwais wrote:

the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all

lol @ "get screwed," like that dude had no hand in creating his situation


you can have a hand in it AND get screwed. I know that two concepts can be difficult to juggle, especially when the curve is involved, but its not that complicated

"get caught" =/= "get screwed" HTH


doesn't help, but thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6108
This thread is getting out of control. I mean the kid did break the rules and deserves the proper punishment, but it's just like we all want blood now. At this point it's up to the school/students whether to do anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Posts: 21250
This is how the TLS Whokabian era begins brothers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 152
kwais wrote:

the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all


you can have a hand in it AND get screwed. I know that two concepts can be difficult to juggle, especially when the curve is involved, but its not that complicated[/quote]
"get caught" =/= "get screwed" HTH[/quote]

doesn't help, but thanks[/quote]

If I buy $5 worth of wooden nickels am I getting screwed or getting what I paid for?

I don't know what should happen to this guy. If reported, I doubt the punishment would be too severe. Nonetheless, we are a self-regulating profession and all it takes is a few dipsh!ts to ruin our collective reputation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 2837
shredderrrrrr wrote:
This thread is getting out of control. I mean the kid did break the rules and deserves the proper punishment, but it's just like we all want blood now. At this point it's up to the school/students whether to do anything.


Agreed. This has been seen by enough people now; it's out there. And if someone wants to report it, go ahead. Again, dude deserves whatever he gets. But now this is devolving into XO, and I have to study.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:08 pm
Posts: 325
kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:
kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:
At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.


I think this shit is way worse than what OP did.


Uhhh asking whether or not one of his classmates told the professor about it is worse? Or suggesting that he has peed his pants? Am confused about what exactly is wrong with this.


the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all


I don't have a lot of sympathy for cheaters. If he has any honor he will just turn himself in. I don't like watching people get punished, but I do believe that people who screw over their classmates and try to cheat during important, stressful exams deserve to be treated accordingly.

I'm poking fun at him for what he did, but I hardly think this is "cheerleading" as it's not out of a desire to see someone get punished for the sake of punishment or to watch an institution exercise its power.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6108
beachbum wrote:
shredderrrrrr wrote:
This thread is getting out of control. I mean the kid did break the rules and deserves the proper punishment, but it's just like we all want blood now. At this point it's up to the school/students whether to do anything.


Agreed. This has been seen by enough people now; it's out there. And if someone wants to report it, go ahead. Again, dude deserves whatever he gets. But now this is devolving into XO, and I have to study.


I'd suggest a lock, but I, like many others ITT, am interested if anything comes of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:24 am 
Offline
THE TRIBE HAS SPOKEN.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm
Posts: 3767
shredderrrrrr wrote:
beachbum wrote:
shredderrrrrr wrote:
This thread is getting out of control. I mean the kid did break the rules and deserves the proper punishment, but it's just like we all want blood now. At this point it's up to the school/students whether to do anything.


Agreed. This has been seen by enough people now; it's out there. And if someone wants to report it, go ahead. Again, dude deserves whatever he gets. But now this is devolving into XO, and I have to study.


I'd suggest a lock, but I, like many others ITT, am interested if anything comes of this.


You can suggest it all you want, mods will then go on to ignore your suggestion anyway until they feel like locking it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Posts: 1686
not to get too dramatic here (although you guys are doing plenty of that, self-regulating profession lulz), but if you guys have not come across a good rule that can be administered poorly, then you have not paid attention in Con or Crim. Think for yourselves people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6108
tedalbany wrote:
shredderrrrrr wrote:
beachbum wrote:
shredderrrrrr wrote:
This thread is getting out of control. I mean the kid did break the rules and deserves the proper punishment, but it's just like we all want blood now. At this point it's up to the school/students whether to do anything.


Agreed. This has been seen by enough people now; it's out there. And if someone wants to report it, go ahead. Again, dude deserves whatever he gets. But now this is devolving into XO, and I have to study.


I'd suggest a lock, but I, like many others ITT, am interested if anything comes of this.


You can suggest it all you want, mods will then go on to ignore your suggestion anyway until they feel like locking it.


Lol...ok?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Posts: 3766
lobolawyer wrote:
kwais wrote:
wow, just visited XO for the first time. That might be the worst website I've even seen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6108
chimp wrote:
lobolawyer wrote:
kwais wrote:
wow, just visited XO for the first time. That might be the worst website I've even seen


It fucking makes Xanga look state of the art.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Posts: 638
I just received a phone call that I had to read this thread. Unbelievable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6108
TTRansfer wrote:
I just received a phone call that I had to read this thread. Unbelievable.


Lol before we know it, it'll be on Yahoo news.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:35 am 
Offline
Love me, Tinder?
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:27 pm
Posts: 6737
This thread was awesome until XO was mentioned. I can't go on there because I am a female minority. I second the streams crossing paths comment that I am too lazy to find ATM.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Posts: 819
kwais wrote:
wow, just visited XO for the first time. That might be the worst website I've even seen


ssshhhhhh... some of them have sensitive feelings


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Posts: 21250
Jessuf wrote:
This thread was awesome until XO was mentioned. I can't go on there because I am a female minority. I second the streams crossing paths comment that I am too lazy to find ATM.


They love WOC now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:26 pm
Posts: 933
kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:
kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:
At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.


I think this shit is way worse than what OP did.


Uhhh asking whether or not one of his classmates told the professor about it is worse? Or suggesting that he has peed his pants? Am confused about what exactly is wrong with this.


the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all

+1. I think this thread tells us more about the character of Duke students in general than just the OP.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:43 am
Posts: 121
Desert Fox wrote:
Jessuf wrote:
This thread was awesome until XO was mentioned. I can't go on there because I am a female minority. I second the streams crossing paths comment that I am too lazy to find ATM.


They love WOC now.

Pretty sure it's metaflame breh


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Posts: 21250
Napt wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
Jessuf wrote:
This thread was awesome until XO was mentioned. I can't go on there because I am a female minority. I second the streams crossing paths comment that I am too lazy to find ATM.


They love WOC now.

Pretty sure it's metaflame breh


Have I been slaying BBdubs for no reason?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am
Posts: 638
shredderrrrrr wrote:
TTRansfer wrote:
I just received a phone call that I had to read this thread. Unbelievable.


Lol before we know it, it'll be on Yahoo news.


You know shit is real when people actually start phoning people on the matter. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:45 am 
Offline
THE TRIBE HAS SPOKEN.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm
Posts: 3767
20 users and 36 guests on this forum, which usually has like 5 people total on it asking about some 7th amendment bullshit in con law.... OP is screwed.

ETA: Someone just linked this thread in my law school's fb group


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:36 am
Posts: 2725
Love how all of this was started by some rando with 5 poasts in a year and a half.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:10 am 
Offline
THE TRIBE HAS SPOKEN.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm
Posts: 3767
Think this'll end up on ATL?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:42 am 
Offline
Pirate, Esq.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 1981 12:25 am
Posts: 17899
Location: 41.89' N, 87.61' W
Reminder: We have rules here.

As much as everyone loves a witch hunt, recall that we do have outing rules here. We also have rules against some of the more extreme language. Because I'm feeling generous (lazy) I'm not going to go back through the thread an ban people for things posted so far, but I recommend everyone rein themselves in a bit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Citizen Genet, Marath0n, oaken and 24 guests



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB