.

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
nomnomaments
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:23 pm

Re: .

Postby nomnomaments » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:48 pm

Ludovico Technique wrote:
TaipeiMort wrote:
Apologies. Why the faux outrage from a person who chooses a child dressed up as an old-woman rapist in a film directed by America's most overrated filmmaker/closet racist as their profile picture?


Because you're comparing a picture of a kid dressed up as a fictional character to using racial and gay slurs. There's nothing faux about it, you're a fucking asshole


+1. its a kid. its an avatar. its kind of funny. don't take things so seriously. u mad bro?

lobolawyer
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: .

Postby lobolawyer » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:50 pm

kwais wrote:wow, just visited XO for the first time. That might be the worst website I've even seen

User avatar
TTTLS
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am

Re: .

Postby TTTLS » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:51 pm

Registration has been closed on XO for awhile. Anyone know why?

User avatar
tedalbany
Posts: 1697
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm

Re: .

Postby tedalbany » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:51 pm

I'm kinda scared of all this cross TLS-XOXO referencing ITT. Some streams aren't meant to cross.

User avatar
tedalbany
Posts: 1697
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm

Re: .

Postby tedalbany » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:53 pm

TTTLS wrote:Registration has been closed on XO for awhile. Anyone know why?


According to random xoxo poster, it's because "rach is on the rag"

User avatar
Borg
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:08 pm

Re: .

Postby Borg » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:56 pm

At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.

User avatar
TTTLS
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am

Re: .

Postby TTTLS » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:00 am

tedalbany wrote:
TTTLS wrote:Registration has been closed on XO for awhile. Anyone know why?


According to random xoxo poster, it's because "rach is on the rag"

:? I tried to register like 5 times over the course of a year and never got the damn confirmation email. Now I can't even get to the damn registration page. foreverlurking.

Borg wrote:At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.
I actually feel bad for the OP.

User avatar
kwais
Posts: 1683
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: .

Postby kwais » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:00 am

Borg wrote:At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.


I think this shit is way worse than what OP did.

User avatar
shredderrrrrr
Posts: 4673
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am

Re: .

Postby shredderrrrrr » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:00 am

Woah, never heard of that XO thread. According to them: "Read the thread. That 'shredderrrrrr' guy seems especially subhuman."

I'm not down with new hip lingo. That's a compliment, right?

User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: .

Postby beachbum » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:01 am

Borg wrote:At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.


Honestly, I'm not sure. I haven't, and I haven't talked to anyone who has. Dude could get off without anything, other than the brick he shit as all of this was going down. Which is fine, as long as he does his part to boost the curve.

But, then, a lot of Duke students browse anonymously, so I can't speak for them.
Last edited by beachbum on Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:03 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
chrispronger
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:12 pm

Re: .

Postby chrispronger » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:02 am

beachbum wrote:
Borg wrote:At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.


Honestly, I'm not sure. I haven't, and I haven't talked to anyone who has. Dude could get off without anything, other than the brick he shit as all of this was going down. Which is fine, as long as he does his part to boost the curve.

But, then, a lot of Duke students browse anonymously, so I can't speak for them.


Ditto

User avatar
Borg
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:08 pm

Re: .

Postby Borg » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:03 am

kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.


I think this shit is way worse than what OP did.


Uhhh asking whether or not one of his classmates told the professor about it is worse? Or suggesting that he has peed his pants? Am confused about what exactly is wrong with this.

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:04 am

The general idea of him shaking in his boots. There's also the chance that someone outside of Duke reported him; seems unlikely but you never know.

User avatar
kwais
Posts: 1683
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: .

Postby kwais » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:05 am

Borg wrote:
kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.


I think this shit is way worse than what OP did.


Uhhh asking whether or not one of his classmates told the professor about it is worse? Or suggesting that he has peed his pants? Am confused about what exactly is wrong with this.


the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:07 am

kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:
kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:At this point someone has undoubtedly linked the professor to the thread right? This guy is going down soon I'm sure. The best way to identify him will probably be by the urine marks on his pants and generally freaked out demeanor.


I think this shit is way worse than what OP did.


Uhhh asking whether or not one of his classmates told the professor about it is worse? Or suggesting that he has peed his pants? Am confused about what exactly is wrong with this.


the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all


So you want to be a lawyer but you don't believe in justice?

User avatar
sundance95
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: .

Postby sundance95 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:07 am

kwais wrote:
the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all

lol @ "get screwed," like that dude had no hand in creating his situation

09042014
Posts: 18282
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: .

Postby 09042014 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:07 am

Rate me as a Box nude pic.

Napt
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:43 am

Re: .

Postby Napt » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:09 am

Morgan12Oak wrote:
kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:
kwais wrote:
I think this shit is way worse than what OP did.


Uhhh asking whether or not one of his classmates told the professor about it is worse? Or suggesting that he has peed his pants? Am confused about what exactly is wrong with this.


the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all


So you want to be a lawyer but you don't believe in justice?

lol

180 if flame, /self if srs

User avatar
kwais
Posts: 1683
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: .

Postby kwais » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:10 am

sundance95 wrote:
kwais wrote:
the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all

lol @ "get screwed," like that dude had no hand in creating his situation


you can have a hand in it AND get screwed. I know that two concepts can be difficult to juggle, especially when the curve is involved, but its not that complicated

User avatar
tedalbany
Posts: 1697
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 pm

Re: .

Postby tedalbany » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:10 am

Morgan12Oak wrote:
kwais wrote:
Borg wrote:
kwais wrote:I think this shit is way worse than what OP did.


Uhhh asking whether or not one of his classmates told the professor about it is worse? Or suggesting that he has peed his pants? Am confused about what exactly is wrong with this.


the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all


So you want to be a lawyer but you don't believe in justice?


Internet lynch mobs aren't justice, you mouth breathing retard.

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:10 am

cant do the time dont do the crime hth

dreakol
Posts: 572
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:56 pm

Re: .

Postby dreakol » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:11 am

Desert Fox wrote:Rate me as a Box nude pic.


the one where she is banging that 5'6, BAF bro

User avatar
sundance95
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: .

Postby sundance95 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:11 am

kwais wrote:
sundance95 wrote:
kwais wrote:
the cheerleading for someone to get screwed. I think its worse. that's all

lol @ "get screwed," like that dude had no hand in creating his situation


you can have a hand in it AND get screwed. I know that two concepts can be difficult to juggle, especially when the curve is involved, but its not that complicated

"get caught" =/= "get screwed" HTH

User avatar
kwais
Posts: 1683
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: .

Postby kwais » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:11 am

Morgan12Oak wrote:
So you want to be a lawyer but you don't believe in justice?


I guess we have different definitions for justice

09042014
Posts: 18282
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: .

Postby 09042014 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:11 am

dreakol wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:Rate me as a Box nude pic.


the one where she is banging that 5'6, BAF bro


tyty




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests