.

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: .

Postby beachbum » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:03 am

Kikero wrote:
ben4847 wrote:Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?


Nope.


+1, which is how I know dude is in my section, and dude was trying to turn our conlaw exam into a group project. Dude's old posts (which he took the liberty to erase) were also quoted in other posts.

I'd probably say something if this was more serious, but a) fuck that, I'm tired, and b) having to ask TLS for help probably doesn't speak well for your grade.

User avatar
thelawyler
Posts: 902
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm

Re: .

Postby thelawyler » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:15 am

LOL this is good.

User avatar
Lawl Shcool
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: .

Postby Lawl Shcool » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:19 am

I am very interested in the outcome of this thread.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: .

Postby rad lulz » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:22 am

beachbum wrote:
Kikero wrote:
ben4847 wrote:Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?


Nope.


+1, which is how I know dude is in my section, and dude was trying to turn our conlaw exam into a group project. Dude's old posts (which he took the liberty to erase) were also quoted in other posts.

I'd probably say something if this was more serious, but a) fuck that, I'm tired, and b) having to ask TLS for help probably doesn't speak well for your grade.

lulz

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:30 am

If you didn't study for the con law final and think you're gonna bomb it, report it.

User avatar
Lawl Shcool
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: .

Postby Lawl Shcool » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:25 am

This thread died to quickly for my liking.

User avatar
Systematic1
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:14 pm

Re: .

Postby Systematic1 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:50 am

--LinkRemoved--

User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: .

Postby beachbum » Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:47 am

Lawl Shcool wrote:This thread died to quickly for my liking.


+1, where did OP go?

User avatar
jessuf
Posts: 12586
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:27 pm

Re: .

Postby jessuf » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:25 pm

beachbum wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:This thread died to quickly for my liking.


+1, where did OP go?


He's probably lurking and sweating

User avatar
shredderrrrrr
Posts: 4673
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am

Re: .

Postby shredderrrrrr » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:58 pm

lobolawyer wrote:
Extension_Cord wrote:
angrybird wrote:i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


+2


Legendary.

User avatar
justonemoregame
Posts: 1160
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: .

Postby justonemoregame » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:10 pm

So uhh, do honor codes require those who know about this to report?

User avatar
SilverE2
Posts: 931
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:04 pm

Re: .

Postby SilverE2 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:14 pm

justonemoregame wrote:So uhh, do honor codes require those who know about this to report?


Your honor code might. I believe ours does.

User avatar
dowu
Posts: 8334
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: .

Postby dowu » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:14 pm

Jessuf wrote:
beachbum wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:This thread died to quickly for my liking.


+1, where did OP go?


He's probably lurking and sweating


This thread delivered.

User avatar
shredderrrrrr
Posts: 4673
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am

Re: .

Postby shredderrrrrr » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:16 pm

justonemoregame wrote:So uhh, do honor codes require those who know about this to report?


I'm going to assume yes. I want to see how this turns out.

Image

User avatar
I.P. Daly
Posts: 920
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:27 pm

Re: .

Postby I.P. Daly » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:20 pm

This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?

User avatar
Unitas
Posts: 1387
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: .

Postby Unitas » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:24 pm

I.P. Daly wrote:This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


Maybe the classmate was also scanning TLS for an answer to his take home question?

User avatar
dowu
Posts: 8334
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: .

Postby dowu » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:24 pm

I.P. Daly wrote:This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


Chances are slim, but possible nonetheless.

User avatar
SilverE2
Posts: 931
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:04 pm

Re: .

Postby SilverE2 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:27 pm

I.P. Daly wrote:This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?

User avatar
Kikero
Posts: 1208
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am

Re: .

Postby Kikero » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:28 pm

I.P. Daly wrote:This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


Does this mean beachbum is also in on the flame?

beachbum wrote:
Kikero wrote:
ben4847 wrote:Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?


Nope.


+1, which is how I know dude is in my section, and dude was trying to turn our conlaw exam into a group project. Dude's old posts (which he took the liberty to erase) were also quoted in other posts.

I'd probably say something if this was more serious, but a) fuck that, I'm tired, and b) having to ask TLS for help probably doesn't speak well for your grade.


Personally I'm of the opinion that you can never underestimate idiocy, so I'm inclined to believe this is legit. Funny either way though.

User avatar
shredderrrrrr
Posts: 4673
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am

Re: .

Postby shredderrrrrr » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:36 pm

SilverE2 wrote:
I.P. Daly wrote:This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/m ... le&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Are you saying that his "classmate" was a flame? He joined back in October of 2010...that would be a flame a long time coming.

User avatar
SilverE2
Posts: 931
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:04 pm

Re: .

Postby SilverE2 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:39 pm

shredderrrrrr wrote:
SilverE2 wrote:
I.P. Daly wrote:This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Are you saying that his "classmate" was a flame? He joined back in October of 2010...that would be a flame a long time coming.


I just think it's weird how his classmate's account is now inactive. Like...why?

User avatar
shredderrrrrr
Posts: 4673
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am

Re: .

Postby shredderrrrrr » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:40 pm

SilverE2 wrote:
shredderrrrrr wrote:
SilverE2 wrote:
I.P. Daly wrote:This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/m ... le&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Are you saying that his "classmate" was a flame? He joined back in October of 2010...that would be a flame a long time coming.


I just think it's weird how his classmate's account is now inactive. Like...why?


No idea. Maybe he didn't want to do anything and was afraid he would get in trouble for spotting it and not reporting it?

User avatar
chrispronger
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:12 pm

Re: .

Postby chrispronger » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:04 pm

SilverE2 wrote:
shredderrrrrr wrote:
SilverE2 wrote:
I.P. Daly wrote:This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Are you saying that his "classmate" was a flame? He joined back in October of 2010...that would be a flame a long time coming.


I just think it's weird how his classmate's account is now inactive. Like...why?


It's not a flame and I'm slightly pissed off about it. It was a 27 hour open universe Con Law exam at Duke, with the sole stipulation being that you could not consult a "sentient being." Part of the first question dealt with what OP asked. It was a 2 section class. Beachbum's section took the exam Sunday-Monday (he posted about it in the 1L Exam Prep thread), my section took it Thursday-Friday. One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question. Normally, I'd just let this stuff go, but if his (her?) stuff was still accessible, I'd do as much research as possible to out them. Really? Open universe, and you break the only rule?

Morgan12Oak
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am

Re: .

Postby Morgan12Oak » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:10 pm

Sounds like whoever is in the class ought to report it. Chances are someone probably already has and it might be a violation of the honor code if you guys knew about it and didn't report it.

To add: seems like one of those things nothing can be done but the professor may find out about and be like why didn't you guys come forward type of deals

User avatar
beachbum
Posts: 2766
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm

Re: .

Postby beachbum » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:18 pm

chrispronger wrote:One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.


This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.

On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], thisyearsgirl, Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests