Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 17  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 2837
Kikero wrote:
ben4847 wrote:
Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?


Nope.


+1, which is how I know dude is in my section, and dude was trying to turn our conlaw exam into a group project. Dude's old posts (which he took the liberty to erase) were also quoted in other posts.

I'd probably say something if this was more serious, but a) fuck that, I'm tired, and b) having to ask TLS for help probably doesn't speak well for your grade.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 890
LOL this is good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 803
I am very interested in the outcome of this thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Posts: 9042
beachbum wrote:
Kikero wrote:
ben4847 wrote:
Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?


Nope.


+1, which is how I know dude is in my section, and dude was trying to turn our conlaw exam into a group project. Dude's old posts (which he took the liberty to erase) were also quoted in other posts.

I'd probably say something if this was more serious, but a) fuck that, I'm tired, and b) having to ask TLS for help probably doesn't speak well for your grade.

lulz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Posts: 348
If you didn't study for the con law final and think you're gonna bomb it, report it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 803
This thread died to quickly for my liking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:14 pm
Posts: 463
http://ip-lookup.net/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 2837
Lawl Shcool wrote:
This thread died to quickly for my liking.


+1, where did OP go?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:25 pm 
Online
Love me, Tinder?
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:27 pm
Posts: 6732
beachbum wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:
This thread died to quickly for my liking.


+1, where did OP go?


He's probably lurking and sweating


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6107
lobolawyer wrote:
Extension_Cord wrote:
angrybird wrote:
i always make a point to click on threads that have been renamed "." this one did not disappoint.


+2


Legendary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:51 pm
Posts: 976
So uhh, do honor codes require those who know about this to report?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 1397
justonemoregame wrote:
So uhh, do honor codes require those who know about this to report?


Your honor code might. I believe ours does.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm
Posts: 8032
Jessuf wrote:
beachbum wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:
This thread died to quickly for my liking.


+1, where did OP go?


He's probably lurking and sweating


This thread delivered.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6107
justonemoregame wrote:
So uhh, do honor codes require those who know about this to report?


I'm going to assume yes. I want to see how this turns out.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:27 pm
Posts: 5762
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Posts: 2474
I.P. Daly wrote:
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


Maybe the classmate was also scanning TLS for an answer to his take home question?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm
Posts: 8032
I.P. Daly wrote:
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


Chances are slim, but possible nonetheless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 1397
I.P. Daly wrote:
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am
Posts: 1310
I.P. Daly wrote:
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


Does this mean beachbum is also in on the flame?

beachbum wrote:
Kikero wrote:
ben4847 wrote:
Am I the only one who immediately clicks on any thread that has been edited out to a ".", and then looks to see where the OP was quoted?


Nope.


+1, which is how I know dude is in my section, and dude was trying to turn our conlaw exam into a group project. Dude's old posts (which he took the liberty to erase) were also quoted in other posts.

I'd probably say something if this was more serious, but a) fuck that, I'm tired, and b) having to ask TLS for help probably doesn't speak well for your grade.


Personally I'm of the opinion that you can never underestimate idiocy, so I'm inclined to believe this is legit. Funny either way though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6107
SilverE2 wrote:
I.P. Daly wrote:
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/m ... le&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Are you saying that his "classmate" was a flame? He joined back in October of 2010...that would be a flame a long time coming.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 1397
shredderrrrrr wrote:
SilverE2 wrote:
I.P. Daly wrote:
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Are you saying that his "classmate" was a flame? He joined back in October of 2010...that would be a flame a long time coming.


I just think it's weird how his classmate's account is now inactive. Like...why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6107
SilverE2 wrote:
shredderrrrrr wrote:
SilverE2 wrote:
I.P. Daly wrote:
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/m ... le&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Are you saying that his "classmate" was a flame? He joined back in October of 2010...that would be a flame a long time coming.


I just think it's weird how his classmate's account is now inactive. Like...why?


No idea. Maybe he didn't want to do anything and was afraid he would get in trouble for spotting it and not reporting it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:12 pm
Posts: 19
SilverE2 wrote:
shredderrrrrr wrote:
SilverE2 wrote:
I.P. Daly wrote:
This thread has to be a flame. OP posts a question about his take home exam, and he almost immediately gets caught and called out by one of his classmates?


You know what...I think you may be right. Check out his "classmate's" profile:

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=69286

He's inactive. Why?


Are you saying that his "classmate" was a flame? He joined back in October of 2010...that would be a flame a long time coming.


I just think it's weird how his classmate's account is now inactive. Like...why?


It's not a flame and I'm slightly pissed off about it. It was a 27 hour open universe Con Law exam at Duke, with the sole stipulation being that you could not consult a "sentient being." Part of the first question dealt with what OP asked. It was a 2 section class. Beachbum's section took the exam Sunday-Monday (he posted about it in the 1L Exam Prep thread), my section took it Thursday-Friday. One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question. Normally, I'd just let this stuff go, but if his (her?) stuff was still accessible, I'd do as much research as possible to out them. Really? Open universe, and you break the only rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Posts: 348
Sounds like whoever is in the class ought to report it. Chances are someone probably already has and it might be a violation of the honor code if you guys knew about it and didn't report it.

To add: seems like one of those things nothing can be done but the professor may find out about and be like why didn't you guys come forward type of deals


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 2837
chrispronger wrote:
One nice thing about the OP is that it looks like he (she?) had no idea what the question was asking based on how he framed his question.


This is why I'm not overly concerned with the OP. If he had posted the full question, or had otherwise posted something moderately intelligent, I might be a little more proactive. But dude doesn't seem to have fully understood the question, and he didn't get any meaningful answers/feedback. Still a pretty shitty thing to do, though.

On the other hand, I didn't even consider being bound by the honor code to report stuff like this. I mean, shit, if I am bound by honor and duty to destroy OP, what choice do I really have, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Revolver066 and 9 guests



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB