Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home		Law School
Admissions		Law
Schools		Law
Students		TLS
Forums		 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Students and Graduates » Forum for Law School Students

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 5 of 17
  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 17  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
zozin
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Posts: 3262
shredderrrrrr wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:
This thread just keeps delivering. I can't wait for someone to troll in OP's interest and see that reaction too.


Never have I been happier to click on a "." thread.

Also, I'm surprised by how most everyone ITT is on the same side. Usually in situtations like this, half of the posters start telling people to relax and discourage narking.

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Kikero
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:28 am
Posts: 1366
shredderrrrrr wrote:
Lawl Shcool wrote:
This thread just keeps delivering. I can't wait for someone to troll in OP's interest and see that reaction too.


Never have I been happier to click on a "." thread.

Also, I'm surprised by how most everyone ITT is on the same side. Usually in situtations like this, half of the posters start telling people to relax and discourage narking.


Image

LEAVE OP ALONE!
Top
 Profile  
 
Systematic1
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:14 pm
Posts: 468
I'm always entertained by the demise of a cheater.

If it was an ALT account I would bet he's one of the people on here claiming they want to "see the OP go down...etc., etc." Just like a criminal returns to the scene of a crime. Prime suspects "chrispronger" or "beachbum"
Top
 Profile  
 
beachbum
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Posts: 2838
That beachbum guy sounds shady as fuck. I don't trust him.
Top
 Profile  
 
stillwater
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:19 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Posts: 2292
Systematic1 wrote:
I'm always entertained by the demise of a cheater.

If it was an ALT account I would bet he's one of the people on here claiming they want to "see the OP go down...etc., etc." Just like a criminal returns to the scene of a crime. Prime suspects "chrispronger" or "beachbum"


like an arsonist who returns to watch his own fire...
Top
 Profile  
 
chrispronger
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:12 pm
Posts: 19
beachbum wrote:
That beachbum guy sounds shady as fuck. I don't trust him.


chrispronger was an oafish waste of space when he played for the blues anyways... probably racist too because he plays hockey.
Top
 Profile  
 
rad lulz
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:22 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Posts: 9580
PitchO20 wrote:
Doesn't signing up for TLS forums require an e-mail address? I'd imagine that would narrow things down.

Use a throwaway you n00b
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6261
Systematic1 wrote:
I'm always entertained by the demise of a cheater.

If it was an ALT account I would bet he's one of the people on here claiming they want to "see the OP go down...etc., etc." Just like a criminal returns to the scene of a crime. Prime suspects "chrispronger" or "beachbum"


And I almost got away with it, if it weren't for you pesky kids.
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6261
rad lulz wrote:
PitchO20 wrote:
Doesn't signing up for TLS forums require an e-mail address? I'd imagine that would narrow things down.

Use a throwaway you n00b


You sure seem to know an awful lot about this...

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
minutemanmike
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 2
Always Credited wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.


Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO


Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Quote:
Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6261
minutemanmike wrote:
Always Credited wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.


Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO


Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Quote:
Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised


TOS do appear to be a roadblock, but I wouldn't worry about precedent lol.
Top
 Profile  
 
minutemanmike
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 2
shredderrrrrr wrote:
minutemanmike wrote:
Always Credited wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.


Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO


Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Quote:
Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised


TOS do appear to be a roadblock, but I wouldn't worry about precedent lol.


Don't really care since, I lurk mostly in Employment, guess I'll just refrain from posting anonymously since most questions are usually covered by other posters. Better them then me.
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6261
Quote:
Don't really care since, I lurk mostly in Employment, guess I'll just refrain from posting anonymously since most questions are usually covered by other posters. Better them then me.


Just don't post stuff you wouldn't say in real life. Whether TLS gives out your info or not, nothing is really anonymous.
Top
 Profile  
 
dailygrind
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:08 am
Posts: 15465
minutemanmike wrote:
Always Credited wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.


Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO


Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Quote:
Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised


Nice try, OP. Banned.
Top
 Profile  
 
zozin
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Posts: 3262
dailygrind wrote:
Nice try, OP. Banned.

:lol: :lol:
Top
 Profile  
 
PitchO20
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:35 pm
Posts: 189
dailygrind wrote:
minutemanmike wrote:
Always Credited wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.


Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO


Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Quote:
Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised


Nice try, OP. Banned.


The plot thickens! I thought it was kind of suspicious that someone's FIRST POST ON TLS happened to be in this thread, and happened to be (indirectly) defending OP. C'mon, mods, send that info down to Duke.
Top
 Profile  
 
SilverE2
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:04 pm
Posts: 1397
dailygrind wrote:
minutemanmike wrote:
Always Credited wrote:
Morgan12Oak wrote:
It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.


Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO


Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Quote:
Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised


Nice try, OP. Banned.


LOL

BEST. THREAD. EVAR.
Top
 Profile  
 
Ludovico Technique
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:43 pm 
Offline
Pockets full of 180s
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Posts: 6704
Oh shit how many times can his thread deliver
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6261
Quote:
The plot thickens! I thought it was kind of suspicious that someone's FIRST POST ON TLS happened to be in this thread, and happened to be (indirectly) defending OP. C'mon, mods, send that info down to Duke.


Lol shit, I didn't even catch that. Shows what kind of lawyer I'll be :oops:
Top
 Profile  
 
Morgan12Oak
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Posts: 355
and that was a good idea.... how?
Top
 Profile  
 
Lawl Shcool
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 803
YES!

I vote for an un-banning so this thread doesn't die. I guarantee OP's third attempt at thread entry will be even better than his second.
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6261
Morgan12Oak wrote:
and that was a good idea.... how?


Lol it
A. shows that the OP was serious/not a troll (and is now nervous),
B. provides another IP address/email from which to be identified,
C. provides his name (Mike)...unless of course he was anticipating being called out and intentionally gave a fake name,
D. makes him look like a douche.
Top
 Profile  
 
Morgan12Oak
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:59 am
Posts: 355
Give him credit: he argued statute AND policy... now if only he spent a fraction of that time trying to figure out his original question he asked in this thread...
Top
 Profile  
 
Systematic1
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:14 pm
Posts: 468
dailygrind wrote:
Nice try, OP. Banned.


:D :D :D Justice!!!...kind of
Top
 Profile  
 
shredderrrrrr
 Post subject: Re: .
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:36 am
Posts: 6261
Lawl Shcool wrote:
YES!

I vote for an un-banning so this thread doesn't die. I guarantee OP's third attempt at thread entry will be even better than his second.


Should've let the guy stay longer so he could've called himself out even more...he obviously showed he was plenty capable of doing something that dumb.
Top
 Profile  
 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 5 of 17
  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 17  Next

Board index » Students and Graduates » Forum for Law School Students

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB