. Forum

[zozin]

This thread just keeps delivering. I can't wait for someone to troll in OP's interest and see that reaction too.

Never have I been happier to click on a "." thread.

Also, I'm surprised by how most everyone ITT is on the same side. Usually in situtations like this, half of the posters start telling people to relax and discourage narking.

--ImageRemoved--

[Kikero]

This thread just keeps delivering. I can't wait for someone to troll in OP's interest and see that reaction too.

Never have I been happier to click on a "." thread.

Also, I'm surprised by how most everyone ITT is on the same side. Usually in situtations like this, half of the posters start telling people to relax and discourage narking.

LEAVE OP ALONE!

[Systematic1]

I'm always entertained by the demise of a cheater.

If it was an ALT account I would bet he's one of the people on here claiming they want to "see the OP go down...etc., etc." Just like a criminal returns to the scene of a crime. Prime suspects "chrispronger" or "beachbum"

[beachbum]

That beachbum guy sounds shady as fuck. I don't trust him.

[stillwater]

I'm always entertained by the demise of a cheater.

If it was an ALT account I would bet he's one of the people on here claiming they want to "see the OP go down...etc., etc." Just like a criminal returns to the scene of a crime. Prime suspects "chrispronger" or "beachbum"

like an arsonist who returns to watch his own fire...

[chrispronger]

That beachbum guy sounds shady as fuck. I don't trust him.

chrispronger was an oafish waste of space when he played for the blues anyways... probably racist too because he plays hockey.

[rad lulz]

Doesn't signing up for TLS forums require an e-mail address? I'd imagine that would narrow things down.

Use a throwaway you n00b

[shredderrrrrr]

I'm always entertained by the demise of a cheater.

If it was an ALT account I would bet he's one of the people on here claiming they want to "see the OP go down...etc., etc." Just like a criminal returns to the scene of a crime. Prime suspects "chrispronger" or "beachbum"

And I almost got away with it, if it weren't for you pesky kids.

[shredderrrrrr]

Doesn't signing up for TLS forums require an e-mail address? I'd imagine that would narrow things down.

Use a throwaway you n00b

You sure seem to know an awful lot about this...

[minutemanmike]

It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.

Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO

Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised

[shredderrrrrr]

It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.

Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO

Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised

TOS do appear to be a roadblock, but I wouldn't worry about precedent lol.

[minutemanmike]

It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.

Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO

Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised

TOS do appear to be a roadblock, but I wouldn't worry about precedent lol.

Don't really care since, I lurk mostly in Employment, guess I'll just refrain from posting anonymously since most questions are usually covered by other posters. Better them then me.

[shredderrrrrr]

Don't really care since, I lurk mostly in Employment, guess I'll just refrain from posting anonymously since most questions are usually covered by other posters. Better them then me.

Just don't post stuff you wouldn't say in real life. Whether TLS gives out your info or not, nothing is really anonymous.

[dailygrind]

It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.

Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO

Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised

Nice try, OP. Banned.

[zozin]

Nice try, OP. Banned.

[PitchO20]

It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.

Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO

Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised

Nice try, OP. Banned.

The plot thickens! I thought it was kind of suspicious that someone's FIRST POST ON TLS happened to be in this thread, and happened to be (indirectly) defending OP. C'mon, mods, send that info down to Duke.

[SilverE2]

It sounds like at least one, probably multiple people have already turned him in already so I think that is going to be satisfied. I doubt the mod's turn over much unless they get some sort of formal nice request from Duke. The higher chance is if someone already knows who he is. Or, in the alternative he turns himself in thinking that it becomes less severe and calculates his chances of being caught from the above two are relatively high.

Non-content electronic information (including basic subscriber information, IP addresses, and any email accounts he registered under) can be turned over by a private party (TLS) to another private party (Duke) without violating either the Wiretap Act or the Stored Communications Act.

Just saying.

GO MODS GO

Wouldn't this be a breach of TOS, would you ever want to post here again if they did that? I mean in the "anonymous" portion of Legal Employment I'd be deathly afraid to ever post if it could be linked to me.

Reminder of the TOS

Registration will require your email address confirming your registration details and password, but your email will never be provided to anyone. Please click on the links below to begin registering after reading the standard disclaimer below.

As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised

Nice try, OP. Banned.

LOL

BEST. THREAD. EVAR.

[Ludo!]

Oh shit how many times can his thread deliver

[shredderrrrrr]

The plot thickens! I thought it was kind of suspicious that someone's FIRST POST ON TLS happened to be in this thread, and happened to be (indirectly) defending OP. C'mon, mods, send that info down to Duke.

Lol shit, I didn't even catch that. Shows what kind of lawyer I'll be

[Morgan12Oak]

and that was a good idea.... how?

[Lawl Shcool]

YES!

I vote for an un-banning so this thread doesn't die. I guarantee OP's third attempt at thread entry will be even better than his second.

[shredderrrrrr]

and that was a good idea.... how?

Lol it
A. shows that the OP was serious/not a troll (and is now nervous),
B. provides another IP address/email from which to be identified,
C. provides his name (Mike)...unless of course he was anticipating being called out and intentionally gave a fake name,
D. makes him look like a douche.

[Morgan12Oak]

Give him credit: he argued statute AND policy... now if only he spent a fraction of that time trying to figure out his original question he asked in this thread...

[Systematic1]

Nice try, OP. Banned.

Justice!!!...kind of

[shredderrrrrr]

YES!

I vote for an un-banning so this thread doesn't die. I guarantee OP's third attempt at thread entry will be even better than his second.

Should've let the guy stay longer so he could've called himself out even more...he obviously showed he was plenty capable of doing something that dumb.