(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:40 pm
Can someone explain the difference between “suing for restitution” and “suing in quasi-k?” They seem to be overlapping concepts. Neither the E&E nor the CrunchTime explains the difference.
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:54 pm
They *are* overlapping concepts, if you have a quasi K, you can sue for restitution, but you can sue for restitution for other reasons. Restitution is a remedy for a quasi K... other than that I'm not sure what you're asking??
- Posts: 4254
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Restitution is a remedy. Quasi-contract is a legal theory which might entitle one to the remedy of restitution.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: IusGentium and 4 guests