How can you reconcile Harrington and Webb?(Moral Obligation)

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
NYC2014
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:48 pm

How can you reconcile Harrington and Webb?(Moral Obligation)

Postby NYC2014 » Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:37 am

The facts seem to be analogous but the courts come out different ways. Is it a jurisdictional difference or am I missing something (I have something in my notes about an expectation of recompense, but I'm not sure what it means).

BeaverHunter
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 1:05 am

Re: How can you reconcile Harrington and Webb?(Moral Obligation)

Postby BeaverHunter » Fri Apr 06, 2012 3:12 pm

Webb was wrongly decided, and the R2d statute based on it isn't followed. The way my professor taught it, the consideration was forbearance of an unjust enrichment claim.




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: eg13, kakistocracy, laqueredup, Mr. Archer, sarge52 and 12 guests