No, if they were all that smart they wouldn't have gone to law school. You think the people below median are genius? They are shelling out tens of thousands of dollars for job prospects similar to what they had after undergrad. that's smart? Sounds like a fools errand to me. I think what you are trying to say is that everyone in law school did well in undergrad. That's a whole lot different than smart.nStiver wrote:Thats what makes law school so damn hard, is everyone is so fucking smart.calilaw wrote:I do take issue with your statement about "students who are intelligent," which implies some are not. All of my peers are exceptionally intelligent, yet by virtue of the curve many received C's. It's not about intelligence; it's about selecting whatever methods work for you (and the courses you're taking) and forcing yourself to study when you would rather be doing other things.
Below median and bewildered Forum
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
- johansantana21
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
Law school finals doesn't test intelligence, it just tests who is a better law school final exam taker.
- sunynp
- Posts: 1875
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 2:06 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
So Mr. Anon, do you think that Peg should drop out now, or give it another semester? What if she has a great scholarship?MrAnon wrote:No, if they were all that smart they wouldn't have gone to law school. You think the people below median are genius? They are shelling out tens of thousands of dollars for job prospects similar to what they had after undergrad. that's smart? Sounds like a fools errand to me. I think what you are trying to say is that everyone in law school did well in undergrad. That's a whole lot different than smart.nStiver wrote:Thats what makes law school so damn hard, is everyone is so fucking smart.calilaw wrote:I do take issue with your statement about "students who are intelligent," which implies some are not. All of my peers are exceptionally intelligent, yet by virtue of the curve many received C's. It's not about intelligence; it's about selecting whatever methods work for you (and the courses you're taking) and forcing yourself to study when you would rather be doing other things.
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
If she savors the idea of being a lawyer then she should stay the course and realize class rankings don't matter for her position. If she doesn't want to be a lawyer anymore then she should quit immediately because she was only in it for the glory of biglaw.sunynp wrote:So Mr. Anon, do you think that Peg should drop out now, or give it another semester? What if she has a great scholarship?MrAnon wrote:No, if they were all that smart they wouldn't have gone to law school. You think the people below median are genius? They are shelling out tens of thousands of dollars for job prospects similar to what they had after undergrad. that's smart? Sounds like a fools errand to me. I think what you are trying to say is that everyone in law school did well in undergrad. That's a whole lot different than smart.nStiver wrote:Thats what makes law school so damn hard, is everyone is so fucking smart.calilaw wrote:I do take issue with your statement about "students who are intelligent," which implies some are not. All of my peers are exceptionally intelligent, yet by virtue of the curve many received C's. It's not about intelligence; it's about selecting whatever methods work for you (and the courses you're taking) and forcing yourself to study when you would rather be doing other things.
If she decides to stay the course then she should realize class rank is not going to be critical to her future anymore. As someone above said, enjoy life more, find a job during school--this is really important, and act like a normal human being. Finish the degree and then get to work. Chasing class rank at this point especially for OCI will just sap a lot of energy that could be put into other endeavors that will matter more to her future.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
Most are intelligent. Not all are, or at least not in a "law school" way. I have seen some exceptionally underprepared people do above median on exams, which makes me wonder what the bottom quarter people are doing to get smoked by people who studied only a minimal amount. I don't think anyone in law school is stupid, but I thoroughly disagree with the TLS and law school administration mantra that everyone in our classes is brilliant. Listen to what your classmates say in class sometime if you really think that everyone is equally smart. If you can't hear the stupid comments, then you may be the one making them.nStiver wrote:Thats what makes law school so damn hard, is everyone is so fucking smart.calilaw wrote:I do take issue with your statement about "students who are intelligent," which implies some are not. All of my peers are exceptionally intelligent, yet by virtue of the curve many received C's. It's not about intelligence; it's about selecting whatever methods work for you (and the courses you're taking) and forcing yourself to study when you would rather be doing other things.
If you reread what I wrote, I said "and." Being intelligent is one requisite to doing what I said, the other is being good at exams. The latter is the far harder one to achieve, and I'd say a pretty small set of students have this skill naturally. But again, based on my own subjective experiences and observations, I think an intelligent student who is good at exam taking can study for a week or two for most exams and perform well. Its probably not the recommended approach, but it is possible. The material just isn't that hard to learn from supplements. I have seen some of my good friends who are just as smart as I am, twice as hard working, and know the material far better than I do, end up with worse grades than me. What's the explanation? Actual exam-taking skills is the difference. I think it is the single biggest factor to doing well in law school.
This is why I think all this discussion about reading strategy and shit is stupid. OP got bad grades because she wrote bad exam answers. She sounds lime she studied hard and understood the material. She just didn't produce quality on game day, so she needs to work on that by learning what the professors want by talking to them, and taking more practice tests. And she should chill and have more fun this semester, I seriously mean that. Getting up at 6 am on a Saturday in January for school stuff? You sound like a treat to go to school with. I really think chilling the hell out and not being so high strung would help your grades a lot.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
Every second you spend not answering a question (or answering a question that isn't asked) is another second your classmates have to spot yet another issue for a question that is asked. That's where they get the edge. And don't even try for a second to say that you spotted all the issues for a single question that you felt the need to go in another direction. Almost no one ever spots all the issues for a question, not even the highest grade in the class.
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
This thread is why law school and class rank are the perfect proxy for biglaw hiring. If biglaw partner asks you to analyze a question and you go off and analyze other questions he did not ask about, and did not do the reading you were asked to do for the assignment, well, then biglaw does not have any use for you.
- AVBucks4239
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:37 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
I agree that OP probably spent too much time outlining, but I don't think taking 3-4 minutes to sketch an outline will hurt your grade. I think professors are generally lazy and prefer answers to be as organized as possible. I know I couldn't do this without outlining.Fresh Prince wrote:Every second you spend not answering a question (or answering a question that isn't asked) is another second your classmates have to spot yet another issue for a question that is asked. That's where they get the edge. And don't even try for a second to say that you spotted all the issues for a single question that you felt the need to go in another direction. Almost no one ever spots all the issues for a question, not even the highest grade in the class.
As this thread has shown, different strokes I guess.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
...I wasn't talking about outlining.AVBucks4239 wrote:I agree that OP probably spent too much time outlining, but I don't think taking 3-4 minutes to sketch an outline will hurt your grade. I think professors are generally lazy and prefer answers to be as organized as possible. I know I couldn't do this without outlining.Fresh Prince wrote:Every second you spend not answering a question (or answering a question that isn't asked) is another second your classmates have to spot yet another issue for a question that is asked. That's where they get the edge. And don't even try for a second to say that you spotted all the issues for a single question that you felt the need to go in another direction. Almost no one ever spots all the issues for a question, not even the highest grade in the class.
As this thread has shown, different strokes I guess.
- AVBucks4239
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:37 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
Ah. I took "every second you spend not answering a question" to include all the time that a person isn't typing.Fresh Prince wrote:...I wasn't talking about outlining.AVBucks4239 wrote:I agree that OP probably spent too much time outlining, but I don't think taking 3-4 minutes to sketch an outline will hurt your grade. I think professors are generally lazy and prefer answers to be as organized as possible. I know I couldn't do this without outlining.Fresh Prince wrote:Every second you spend not answering a question (or answering a question that isn't asked) is another second your classmates have to spot yet another issue for a question that is asked. That's where they get the edge. And don't even try for a second to say that you spotted all the issues for a single question that you felt the need to go in another direction. Almost no one ever spots all the issues for a question, not even the highest grade in the class.
As this thread has shown, different strokes I guess.
But yes, you are definitely right in regards to answering the question being asked.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:09 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
I'm bewildered. Beta Blockers?!?!
Do you take them every day? In PTs? Have you taken them before?
Yes, they reduce your nerves. But unless you have crippling test anxiety, don't you think those nerves will help? I haven't got my grades back yet, but in my exams I was surprised how much I could recall form my outlines compared to my PTs.
But maybe I am overreacting. Does everyone take these things?
Do you take them every day? In PTs? Have you taken them before?
Yes, they reduce your nerves. But unless you have crippling test anxiety, don't you think those nerves will help? I haven't got my grades back yet, but in my exams I was surprised how much I could recall form my outlines compared to my PTs.
But maybe I am overreacting. Does everyone take these things?
- I.P. Daly
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:27 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
No.crossem wrote:I'm bewildered. Beta Blockers?!?!
But maybe I am overreacting. Does everyone take these things?
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
Seriously. The whole OP was like a study in neurotic gimmicky behavior (beta-blockers, a "secret" supplement, reading the professor's articles to "learn their biases," half-assing casebook readings in favor of "learning the BLL") that I didn't think actual law students ever did.I.P. Daly wrote:No.crossem wrote:I'm bewildered. Beta Blockers?!?!
But maybe I am overreacting. Does everyone take these things?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Advice Dog
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:04 am
Re: Below median and bewildered
Law school grading is pretty random because it's incredibly difficult to make meaningful distinctions between 100 exams that all say essentially the same thing in slightly different ways. Plus, many professors are lazy. It's another reason why law school is a joke. First semester of 1L, my GPA was just under median. Second semester GPA was somewhere like top 5%. Didn't change a thing about the way I studied, except perhaps did less of it.
lol law school.
lol law school.
- 3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
Based on my extremely limited experience, I think supplements are a terrible idea. Professors want to see "their" answers. That's pretty much how my torts final was. He wanted to see us apply the logic from the cases he selected. Knowing the rules was half the battle, at best.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
I pulled As and the most I did was outline early, use the best supplements, and do a ton of practice tests early. I know plenty of law students who pulled As doing far less (one just read the Emanuels three times and brought it with him to the exam).Bildungsroman wrote:Seriously. The whole OP was like a study in neurotic gimmicky behavior (beta-blockers, a "secret" supplement, reading the professor's articles to "learn their biases," half-assing casebook readings in favor of "learning the BLL") that I didn't think actual law students ever did.I.P. Daly wrote:No.crossem wrote:I'm bewildered. Beta Blockers?!?!
But maybe I am overreacting. Does everyone take these things?
- cinephile
- Posts: 3461
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
I don't know. The exam I did the worst on is the one where our professor disagreed with the casebook. I tried to repeat his ideas, but that was not what he wanted. I should've used supplements there and learned the BLL since we didn't discuss it in class.3|ink wrote:Based on my extremely limited experience, I think supplements are a terrible idea. Professors want to see "their" answers. That's pretty much how my torts final was. He wanted to see us apply the logic from the cases he selected. Knowing the rules was half the battle, at best.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: Below median and bewildered
I don't want to derail this thread into this same old argument again. Just know that your depiction of grading as "random" is wrong. It probably makes some sense for the exams clusterd tightly between the top quarter and the bottom quarter. However, there is a clear difference in quality between the best exams, mediocre exams, and the bad ones. This accounts for students who consistently snag the best grades (the ones who just "get it"), which wouldn't be possible if it were truly random.Advice Dog wrote:Law school grading is pretty random because it's incredibly difficult to make meaningful distinctions between 100 exams that all say essentially the same thing in slightly different ways. Plus, many professors are lazy. It's another reason why law school is a joke. First semester of 1L, my GPA was just under median. Second semester GPA was somewhere like top 5%. Didn't change a thing about the way I studied, except perhaps did less of it.
lol law school.
/derail
- Advice Dog
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:04 am
Re: Below median and bewildered
At a good school full of smart people who all know what's going on, a relatively "easy" test is going to generate a large pool of substantially similar looking exams. Sure, you can parse the A's from the C's (or whatever the bottom of the curve is at the school), but you're going to have a ton of similar "good" exams that have to lumped into the A-, B+, B categories.0LNewbie wrote:I don't want to derail this thread into this same old argument again. Just know that your depiction of grading as "random" is wrong. It probably makes some sense for the exams clusterd tightly between the top quarter and the bottom quarter. However, there is a clear difference in quality between the best exams, mediocre exams, and the bad ones. This accounts for students who consistently snag the best grades (the ones who just "get it"), which wouldn't be possible if it were truly random.Advice Dog wrote:Law school grading is pretty random because it's incredibly difficult to make meaningful distinctions between 100 exams that all say essentially the same thing in slightly different ways. Plus, many professors are lazy. It's another reason why law school is a joke. First semester of 1L, my GPA was just under median. Second semester GPA was somewhere like top 5%. Didn't change a thing about the way I studied, except perhaps did less of it.
lol law school.
/derail
Most of my professors did not use a rubric. Most did not use short answers. Lengthy issue spotters and policy questions invite frivolous and inconsistent distinctions by lazy professors after weeding out the really good and really bad exams.
- vamedic03
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am
Re: Below median and bewildered
Bitter? I wouldn't immediately call a professor lazy because they use lengthy issue spotters. Nor would I assume that they are arbitrary because they do not use a rubric.Advice Dog wrote:At a good school full of smart people who all know what's going on, a relatively "easy" test is going to generate a large pool of substantially similar looking exams. Sure, you can parse the A's from the C's (or whatever the bottom of the curve is at the school), but you're going to have a ton of similar "good" exams that have to lumped into the A-, B+, B categories.0LNewbie wrote:I don't want to derail this thread into this same old argument again. Just know that your depiction of grading as "random" is wrong. It probably makes some sense for the exams clusterd tightly between the top quarter and the bottom quarter. However, there is a clear difference in quality between the best exams, mediocre exams, and the bad ones. This accounts for students who consistently snag the best grades (the ones who just "get it"), which wouldn't be possible if it were truly random.Advice Dog wrote:Law school grading is pretty random because it's incredibly difficult to make meaningful distinctions between 100 exams that all say essentially the same thing in slightly different ways. Plus, many professors are lazy. It's another reason why law school is a joke. First semester of 1L, my GPA was just under median. Second semester GPA was somewhere like top 5%. Didn't change a thing about the way I studied, except perhaps did less of it.
lol law school.
/derail
Most of my professors did not use a rubric. Most did not use short answers. Lengthy issue spotters and policy questions invite frivolous and inconsistent distinctions by lazy professors after weeding out the really good and really bad exams.
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:18 am
Re: Below median and bewildered
Word. If anything, the lazy professors go all MC on their tests. At least, that's the case where I am.vamedic03 wrote:Bitter? I wouldn't immediately call a professor lazy because they use lengthy issue spotters. Nor would I assume that they are arbitrary because they do not use a rubric.Advice Dog wrote:At a good school full of smart people who all know what's going on, a relatively "easy" test is going to generate a large pool of substantially similar looking exams. Sure, you can parse the A's from the C's (or whatever the bottom of the curve is at the school), but you're going to have a ton of similar "good" exams that have to lumped into the A-, B+, B categories.0LNewbie wrote:I don't want to derail this thread into this same old argument again. Just know that your depiction of grading as "random" is wrong. It probably makes some sense for the exams clusterd tightly between the top quarter and the bottom quarter. However, there is a clear difference in quality between the best exams, mediocre exams, and the bad ones. This accounts for students who consistently snag the best grades (the ones who just "get it"), which wouldn't be possible if it were truly random.Advice Dog wrote:Law school grading is pretty random because it's incredibly difficult to make meaningful distinctions between 100 exams that all say essentially the same thing in slightly different ways. Plus, many professors are lazy. It's another reason why law school is a joke. First semester of 1L, my GPA was just under median. Second semester GPA was somewhere like top 5%. Didn't change a thing about the way I studied, except perhaps did less of it.
lol law school.
/derail
Most of my professors did not use a rubric. Most did not use short answers. Lengthy issue spotters and policy questions invite frivolous and inconsistent distinctions by lazy professors after weeding out the really good and really bad exams.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
No.I.P. Daly wrote:No.crossem wrote:I'm bewildered. Beta Blockers?!?!
But maybe I am overreacting. Does everyone take these things?
- NYC Law
- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 3:33 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
Not entirely sure what a beta blocker is.paulinaporizkova wrote:No.I.P. Daly wrote:No.crossem wrote:I'm bewildered. Beta Blockers?!?!
But maybe I am overreacting. Does everyone take these things?
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Below median and bewildered
I have no idea. I'm ALPHA enough that any beta is already fully blocked.NYC Law wrote:Not entirely sure what a beta blocker is.paulinaporizkova wrote:No.I.P. Daly wrote:No.crossem wrote:I'm bewildered. Beta Blockers?!?!
But maybe I am overreacting. Does everyone take these things?
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:50 am
Re: Below median and bewildered
beta blockers are a class of drugs that are sometimes taken on the underground to reduce performance anxiety. Basically, they stop your fight-or-flight response, AFAIK.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login