K's Question about Specific Performance

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

K's Question about Specific Performance

Postby bartleby » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:37 pm

Can you stipulate specific performance against the breaching party in a K and force them to do something when there is an adequate/commercial remedy? I know policy is compensate not punitive but I'm thinkin maybe because of freedom to make k's

zomginternets
Posts: 547
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 1:59 pm

Re: K's Question about Specific Performance

Postby zomginternets » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:43 pm

well they're contractually obligated to perform their end of the bargain in the first place, so it would be redundant to put in another clause that says the remedy for non-performance is performance. I think a judge would just see this as an end-run-around the general rule of not ordering specific performance of a contract.

User avatar
crossarmant
Posts: 1116
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:01 am

Re: K's Question about Specific Performance

Postby crossarmant » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:51 pm

No, you can't order specific performance. As we learned it, ordering a person to actually perform in a service is involuntary servitude. The only time Specific Performance is allows when it's for a unique good, land, or if it's a commercial offer (like a store's space in a shopping mall) that has damages that are far too speculative over time.

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: K's Question about Specific Performance

Postby bartleby » Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:24 am

awesome, found it in my notes too, u guys rock




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests