lulz, you got me.TTTLS wrote:I got a dig bick. You that read wrong. You read that wrong too.
also, I'm at this point, but I'll still be up for a little bit longer anyway:
lulz, you got me.TTTLS wrote:I got a dig bick. You that read wrong. You read that wrong too.
I lol'd a little too hard at this.TTTLS wrote:I got a dig bick. You that read wrong. You read that wrong too.
same, but i think the closed book exams will generally be more forgiving, especially when it comes to specific details.ilovesf wrote:Also - so jelly of people who don't have closed book con law exams. fml.
are you a wizard?TTTLS wrote:I got a dig bick. You that read wrong. You read that wrong too.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
THIS. but fuck privity for ESs/covenants! Our prof said we could analyze everything as an ES (so no need to worry about privity). Then he proceeded in our review session to . . . analyze privity. Sigh:-(crossarmant wrote:Fuck privity of contract v. privity of estate within leasehold agreements. Fuck it hard.
Mine is in 2 days, but I know what you mean. Last week when I was in the library it was a ghost town by 5pm. Last night the place was empty by 8pm with exams right around the corner. Maybe it's that I'm at a T2 or that people just prefer studying at home, but the fanaticism doesn't seem terribly pervasive this semester.shock259 wrote:T MINUS 1 WEEK
Maybe exams are creeping up on everyone else at my school, too. No one seems nearly as stressed as they were last semester.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
GO ON!Flips88 wrote:I'm sure the clusterfuck of a Con Law exam I just took will be reported on ATL shortly.
Can you disclose your understanding of it on here? I want to see if I get it.crossarmant wrote:Fuck privity of contract v. privity of estate within leasehold agreements. Fuck it hard.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
My understanding is that when a person is given a leasehold estate they are held in privity of contract as well as privity of estate with the landlord. However, when the original Tenant (T1) assigns their lease to Tenant 2 (T2), T1 loses the privity of estate, yet retains the privity of contract unless they specifically give away all rights and responsibilities of the leasehold to T2. If T2 does not take the full rights, but merely an assignment, they are then in privity of estate with the landlord but not privity of contract because they hold privity of contract with T1; but T1 only has privity of contract, not estate with the Landlord. Now if T2 subleases their leasehold to Tenant 3 (T3), then T3 holds neither privity of estate nor contract with the landlord because their privity of contract only exists with T2 since they took a lesser quantum estate from T2 than the full leasehold; T3 also holds no privity of estate to the landlord because T2 still holds the entirety of the leasehold estate while T3 holds a lesser estate than what the landlord assigned.Guchster wrote:Can you disclose your understanding of it on here? I want to see if I get it.crossarmant wrote:Fuck privity of contract v. privity of estate within leasehold agreements. Fuck it hard.
crossarmant wrote:Also if anyone else wants to throwpropertycon law questions out, I'm up for answering and getting others' answers.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
TYBCrosscrossarmant wrote:My understanding is that when a person is given a leasehold estate they are held in privity of contract as well as privity of estate with the landlord. However, when the original Tenant (T1) assigns their lease to Tenant 2 (T2), T1 loses the privity of estate, yet retains the privity of contract unless they specifically give away all rights and responsibilities of the leasehold to T2. If T2 does not take the full rights, but merely an assignment, they are then in privity of estate with the landlord but not privity of contract because they hold privity of contract with T1; but T1 only has privity of contract, not estate with the Landlord. Now if T2 subleases their leasehold to Tenant 3 (T3), then T3 holds neither privity of estate nor contract with the landlord because their privity of contract only exists with T2 since they took a lesser quantum estate from T2 than the full leasehold; T3 also holds no privity of estate to the landlord because T2 still holds the entirety of the leasehold estate while T3 holds a lesser estate than what the landlord assigned.Guchster wrote:Can you disclose your understanding of it on here? I want to see if I get it.crossarmant wrote:Fuck privity of contract v. privity of estate within leasehold agreements. Fuck it hard.
LL & T1 - Privity of Contract
LL & T2 - Privity of Estate
LL & T3 - No privity
T1 & T2 - Privity of contract in assignment
T2 & T3 - Privity of contract in sublease
T1 & T3 - No Privity
So if the LL wanted to sue to recover unpaid rent, they may sue T1 & T2 since the LL holds privity with each, but they could not sue T3. However, T2 can sue T3 in subrogation to recover the due rent.
THAT is my understanding of it. That is also the reason why I say fuck privity of estate and contract in leaseholds.
Teach me civ pro please?Guchster wrote:Feel free to ask questions/give problems for crim, prop, or con law. i learn by practice.
(I can also answer contracts/civ pro for people, cuz i understand stuff, but this won't be useful for me).
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login