Closed Source office memo

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
Extension_Cord

Silver
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:15 pm

Closed Source office memo

Postby Extension_Cord » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:19 pm

Was it the intention of the professor to give us situations where there is no clear cut predictive outcome of our issue? I have changed the predictive outcome on my memo like 10 times!

User avatar
Glock

Bronze
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:48 pm

Re: Closed Source office memo

Postby Glock » Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:23 pm

Maybe. You conclusion is not the important part of the memo. The way you describe precedent cases and compare them to your facts is the important part.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11952
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: Closed Source office memo

Postby kalvano » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:27 pm

Extension_Cord wrote:Was it the intention of the professor to give us situations where there is no clear cut predictive outcome of our issue?



Yes.

User avatar
DCDuck

Bronze
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:27 pm

Re: Closed Source office memo

Postby DCDuck » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:38 pm

Welcome to law school; there is rarely a clear cut answer.

071816

Platinum
Posts: 5509
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm

Re: Closed Source office memo

Postby 071816 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:41 pm

What would be the point of a memo (especially a memo for a law school writing class) if there was a clear cut answer to the question?

WSJ_Law

Bronze
Posts: 356
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:33 am

Re: Closed Source office memo

Postby WSJ_Law » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:34 pm

chimp wrote:What would be the point of a memo (especially a memo for a law school writing class) if there was a clear cut answer to the question?


Literacy test to cross-check for TOEFL cheaters?



Return to “Forum for Law School Students�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests