Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
fanmingrui
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:59 pm

Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?

Postby fanmingrui » Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:55 pm

Title says it. Is there a material difference? The older one is way cheaper on amazon.

User avatar
TTH
Posts: 10380
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 1:14 am

Re: Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?

Postby TTH » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:10 pm

The law of torts doesn't really change much. It took 400 years or so for the concept of fault to be fully accepted. Maybe there's been some changes in products liability or business torts, but we didn't cover that deeply enough in torts to worry about it.

User avatar
fanmingrui
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?

Postby fanmingrui » Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:53 pm

TTH wrote:The law of torts doesn't really change much. It took 400 years or so for the concept of fault to be fully accepted. Maybe there's been some changes in products liability or business torts, but we didn't cover that deeply enough in torts to worry about it.

Thanks!

morris248
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:30 am

Re: Gilbert's torts outline differences between 2002 and 2009?

Postby morris248 » Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:34 pm

The law of torts doesn't really change much


Agreed but 2002 is fairly old. All you need for torts is the E&E or Glannon Guide.




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baller31, LawHammer and 14 guests