LaFave v Dressler Forum
- brickman
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:59 am
LaFave v Dressler
http://www.amazon.com/Criminal-Law-Horn ... BXQUTO8PNJ
http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Cri ... BXQUTO8PNJ
who wins in this fight? Is it even fair to put a hornbook in opposition to Dressler? What is the supplement of choice for Crim?
http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Cri ... BXQUTO8PNJ
who wins in this fight? Is it even fair to put a hornbook in opposition to Dressler? What is the supplement of choice for Crim?
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 am
Re: LaFave v Dressler
The decent looking high school teacher who slept with her student, hands down.
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:40 pm
Re: LaFave v Dressler
hahahah I see what you did thereTransferthrowaway wrote:The decent looking high school teacher who slept with her student, hands down.
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: LaFave v Dressler
Dressler is the only supplement I have read in my law school lifetime and I thought it was very good. Professors love it. LaFave is kind of a genius, however... but mostly on Fourth Amendment matters, I don't know how great his crim supplement would be. His Fourth Amendment treatise is readable and brilliant but I have a feeling a LaFave-authored supplement might be a little nuanced for exam-studying purposes.
- usuaggie
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:43 pm
Re: LaFave v Dressler
i have read each, cover to cover. we were required to use lafave, but i got dressler because lafave rambles a lot. the teacher highly suggested we use lafave and not dressler. I'm glad I didn't listen. dressler is clear and explains things better. Where he and lafave differed, however, i memorized what lafave said.
I'd recommend dressler, but lafave wasn't horrible. the rest of my class absolutely hated lafave though.
I'd recommend dressler, but lafave wasn't horrible. the rest of my class absolutely hated lafave though.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:07 pm
Re: LaFave v Dressler
That's what I imagined Lafave's supplement would be like. Such a smart guy, but he shouldn't be in the supplement-writing business. Very good, though, for academic purposes - or, if you're clerking/externing and are dealing with a tough case, thinking about what the law should say. But that's not what you want out of a supplement, actual reasoned discussion.usuaggie wrote:i have read each, cover to cover. we were required to use lafave, but i got dressler because lafave rambles a lot. the teacher highly suggested we use lafave and not dressler. I'm glad I didn't listen. dressler is clear and explains things better. Where he and lafave differed, however, i memorized what lafave said.
I'd recommend dressler, but lafave wasn't horrible. the rest of my class absolutely hated lafave though.
-
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:01 pm
Re: LaFave v Dressler
Had the Dressler casebook so the Dressler supplement was terrific. The outline of the supplement of the book on the Lexis site was pretty solid also: --LinkRemoved--