LaFave v Dressler Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
brickman

Bronze
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:59 am

LaFave v Dressler

Post by brickman » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:33 pm

http://www.amazon.com/Criminal-Law-Horn ... BXQUTO8PNJ

http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Cri ... BXQUTO8PNJ

who wins in this fight? Is it even fair to put a hornbook in opposition to Dressler? What is the supplement of choice for Crim?

Transferthrowaway

Silver
Posts: 605
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:40 am

Re: LaFave v Dressler

Post by Transferthrowaway » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:36 pm

The decent looking high school teacher who slept with her student, hands down.

ns77770

Bronze
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:40 pm

Re: LaFave v Dressler

Post by ns77770 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:39 pm

Transferthrowaway wrote:The decent looking high school teacher who slept with her student, hands down.
hahahah I see what you did there

traydeuce

Silver
Posts: 680
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:07 pm

Re: LaFave v Dressler

Post by traydeuce » Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:44 pm

Dressler is the only supplement I have read in my law school lifetime and I thought it was very good. Professors love it. LaFave is kind of a genius, however... but mostly on Fourth Amendment matters, I don't know how great his crim supplement would be. His Fourth Amendment treatise is readable and brilliant but I have a feeling a LaFave-authored supplement might be a little nuanced for exam-studying purposes.

User avatar
usuaggie

Silver
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:43 pm

Re: LaFave v Dressler

Post by usuaggie » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:04 pm

i have read each, cover to cover. we were required to use lafave, but i got dressler because lafave rambles a lot. the teacher highly suggested we use lafave and not dressler. I'm glad I didn't listen. dressler is clear and explains things better. Where he and lafave differed, however, i memorized what lafave said.

I'd recommend dressler, but lafave wasn't horrible. the rest of my class absolutely hated lafave though.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


traydeuce

Silver
Posts: 680
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:07 pm

Re: LaFave v Dressler

Post by traydeuce » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:21 pm

usuaggie wrote:i have read each, cover to cover. we were required to use lafave, but i got dressler because lafave rambles a lot. the teacher highly suggested we use lafave and not dressler. I'm glad I didn't listen. dressler is clear and explains things better. Where he and lafave differed, however, i memorized what lafave said.

I'd recommend dressler, but lafave wasn't horrible. the rest of my class absolutely hated lafave though.
That's what I imagined Lafave's supplement would be like. Such a smart guy, but he shouldn't be in the supplement-writing business. Very good, though, for academic purposes - or, if you're clerking/externing and are dealing with a tough case, thinking about what the law should say. But that's not what you want out of a supplement, actual reasoned discussion.

goodolgil

Silver
Posts: 917
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:01 pm

Re: LaFave v Dressler

Post by goodolgil » Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:14 pm

Had the Dressler casebook so the Dressler supplement was terrific. The outline of the supplement of the book on the Lexis site was pretty solid also: --LinkRemoved--

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”