Con law admin agencies Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
BCLS

Silver
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:40 am

Con law admin agencies

Post by BCLS » Fri May 06, 2011 10:26 pm

Quick question guys,

Where do AA's get their power from? Also, when they make a rule or regulation, is it presented to the president for a veto? Otherwise, wouldn't this be a way for congress to get around the presentment clause?

Renzo

Gold
Posts: 4249
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am

Re: Con law admin agencies

Post by Renzo » Fri May 06, 2011 11:00 pm

The answer to this question is basically a whole semester of admin law.

BCLS

Silver
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:40 am

Re: Con law admin agencies

Post by BCLS » Fri May 06, 2011 11:17 pm

hahaha ok i wont worry about it as much for my con law 1 final then

User avatar
vamedic03

Gold
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am

Re: Con law admin agencies

Post by vamedic03 » Fri May 06, 2011 11:38 pm

BCLS wrote:Quick question guys,

Where do AA's get their power from? Also, when they make a rule or regulation, is it presented to the president for a veto? Otherwise, wouldn't this be a way for congress to get around the presentment clause?
(1) Good question
(2) No
(3) No, agencies are theoretically part of the executive

As Renzo said, the answer to this is Admin law. Honestly, even admin law doesn't really resolve question (1).

smittytron3k

Bronze
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Con law admin agencies

Post by smittytron3k » Sat May 07, 2011 1:53 am

(1) AA's exercise executive authority pursuant to their statutory mandate, which restricts the scope of the agency's discretion so as to make the exercise of its authority executive rather than impermissibly delegated legislative authority.
(2) No.
(3) The relevant legislation granting the AA authority to execute the law has to satisfy bicameralism and presentment, but the actual exercise of their authority doesn't. It's not technically lawmaking authority, but executive authority exercised pursuant to an "intelligible principle" found in the statute. See A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495

edited to add: you might want to read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondelegation_doctrine, not that I read this page or can vouch for its accuracy.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”