Quick question guys,
Where do AA's get their power from? Also, when they make a rule or regulation, is it presented to the president for a veto? Otherwise, wouldn't this be a way for congress to get around the presentment clause?
Con law admin agencies Forum
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Con law admin agencies
The answer to this question is basically a whole semester of admin law.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:40 am
Re: Con law admin agencies
hahaha ok i wont worry about it as much for my con law 1 final then
- vamedic03
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:50 am
Re: Con law admin agencies
(1) Good questionBCLS wrote:Quick question guys,
Where do AA's get their power from? Also, when they make a rule or regulation, is it presented to the president for a veto? Otherwise, wouldn't this be a way for congress to get around the presentment clause?
(2) No
(3) No, agencies are theoretically part of the executive
As Renzo said, the answer to this is Admin law. Honestly, even admin law doesn't really resolve question (1).
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Con law admin agencies
(1) AA's exercise executive authority pursuant to their statutory mandate, which restricts the scope of the agency's discretion so as to make the exercise of its authority executive rather than impermissibly delegated legislative authority.
(2) No.
(3) The relevant legislation granting the AA authority to execute the law has to satisfy bicameralism and presentment, but the actual exercise of their authority doesn't. It's not technically lawmaking authority, but executive authority exercised pursuant to an "intelligible principle" found in the statute. See A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495
edited to add: you might want to read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondelegation_doctrine, not that I read this page or can vouch for its accuracy.
(2) No.
(3) The relevant legislation granting the AA authority to execute the law has to satisfy bicameralism and presentment, but the actual exercise of their authority doesn't. It's not technically lawmaking authority, but executive authority exercised pursuant to an "intelligible principle" found in the statute. See A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495
edited to add: you might want to read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondelegation_doctrine, not that I read this page or can vouch for its accuracy.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login