I suck at math, please help me

 Posts: 2170
 Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:40 pm
I suck at math, please help me
Solve for X?
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25

 Posts: 4254
 Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Man. You do suck at math.
 camelcrema
 Posts: 281
 Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:43 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
1,333,333
 UnitarySpace
 Posts: 197
 Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:18 am
Re: I suck at math, please help me
1,333,333 bro.
 buckilaw
 Posts: 839
 Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 1:27 am
Re: I suck at math, please help me
ImageRemoved
Times 424,628
Times 424,628
 mbusch22
 Posts: 255
 Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
camelcrema wrote:
1,333,333
+1. had to try it to see if i had any traces of math skills left.

 Posts: 376
 Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Danteshek wrote:Solve for X?
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25
Just in case.
multiply BOTH SIDES of the equation by (30,666,667 + X).
So. (6,666,667 + X) = .25*(30,666,667 + X)
factor the .25 and get X on one side of the equation
999,999.75 = .75X
divide by .75

 Posts: 4254
 Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: I suck at math, please help me
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25
(6,666,667 + X) /1 = .25(30,666,667 + X)
6,666,667 + X = .25(30,666,667) + .25X
6,666,667 +0.75X = .25(30,666,667)
0.75X = .25(30,666,667)  6,666,667 = 999 999.75
X= 999 999.75/ 0.75
x= 1 333 333
(6,666,667 + X) /1 = .25(30,666,667 + X)
6,666,667 + X = .25(30,666,667) + .25X
6,666,667 +0.75X = .25(30,666,667)
0.75X = .25(30,666,667)  6,666,667 = 999 999.75
X= 999 999.75/ 0.75
x= 1 333 333

 Posts: 2170
 Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:40 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Yeah, I figured it out. Hahaha
No wonder I went to law school. Got 97V and ~40M on GMAT (660).
No wonder I went to law school. Got 97V and ~40M on GMAT (660).
 glewz
 Posts: 781
 Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Danteshek wrote:Solve for X?
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25
Other answers are all correct, but only because X does not equal to 30,666,667. (denominator of the fraction can't be zero) Always check for those conditions.

 Posts: 2170
 Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:40 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Btw, this was part of an anti dilution problem in my Business Planning class

 Posts: 4254
 Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: I suck at math, please help me
glewz wrote:Danteshek wrote:Solve for X?
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25
Other answers are all correct, but only because X does not equal to 30,666,667. (denominator of the fraction can't be zero) Always check for those conditions.
Nerd.

 Posts: 376
 Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
glewz wrote:Danteshek wrote:Solve for X?
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25
Other answers are all correct, but only because X does not equal to 30,666,667. (denominator of the fraction can't be zero) Always check for those conditions.
I'm not sure what you are saying here, maybe I'm just not understanding what you mean. The answer is correct because thats what X needs to be to make the left side equal the right side. I agree with the rule that the denominator cannot equal zero, but what if the question was written like this.
(6,666,667 + X) = .25(30,666,667 + X)
The denominator wouldn't be zero, because there isn't one. If you used 30,666,667 for X you'd get 30,666,667 = 6,666,667, which is obviously not right. X has only one possible answer.

 Posts: 684
 Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:17 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
ptblazer wrote:glewz wrote:Danteshek wrote:Solve for X?
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25
Other answers are all correct, but only because X does not equal to 30,666,667. (denominator of the fraction can't be zero) Always check for those conditions.
I'm not sure what you are saying here, maybe I'm just not understanding what you mean. The answer is correct because thats what X needs to be to make the left side equal the right side. I agree with the rule that the denominator cannot equal zero, but what if the question was written like this.
(6,666,667 + X) = .25(30,666,667 + X)
The denominator wouldn't be zero, because there isn't one. If you used 30,666,667 for X you'd get 30,666,667 = 6,666,667, which is obviously not right. X has only one possible answer.
If you use 30,666,667 for X you would get 24,000,000 / 0 = .25. A zero in the denominator would give you an undefined answer. I think glewz was talking about checking to see that X does not make the denominator zero when posting problems. However, his comment is not relevant since the denominator is not zero and the "condition" he mentioned does not apply.
 stratocophic
 Posts: 2204
 Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Yeah, pretty sure you can manipulate any first order algebraic equation into having an invalid point if you set it up like this, but only because it isn't simplified. You have to simplify all the way before you can start throwing around "can't divide by zeros."random5483 wrote:ptblazer wrote:glewz wrote:Danteshek wrote:Solve for X?
(6,666,667 + X) / (30,666,667 + X) = .25
Other answers are all correct, but only because X does not equal to 30,666,667. (denominator of the fraction can't be zero) Always check for those conditions.
I'm not sure what you are saying here, maybe I'm just not understanding what you mean. The answer is correct because thats what X needs to be to make the left side equal the right side. I agree with the rule that the denominator cannot equal zero, but what if the question was written like this.
(6,666,667 + X) = .25(30,666,667 + X)
The denominator wouldn't be zero, because there isn't one. If you used 30,666,667 for X you'd get 30,666,667 = 6,666,667, which is obviously not right. X has only one possible answer.
If you use 30,666,667 for X you would get 24,000,000 / 0 = .25. A zero in the denominator would give you an undefined answer. I think glewz was talking about checking to see that X does not make the denominator zero when posting problems. However, his comment is not relevant since the denominator is not zero and the "condition" he mentioned does not apply.
 glewz
 Posts: 781
 Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Not true in many cases. Let me settle this and be clear with what I was saying:
@ptblazer, to write it in that different format for other equations (And this one) would be theoretically inequivalent. In the above, the distinction is not meaningful, but regardless, OP always needs to check for conditions in which x cannot exist.
@stratocophic: No, you cannot just simplify by multiplying things through, while not accounting for "can't divide by zeros": Here's a simple example that clarifies:
Problem: (2x^2  x  1) / (x  1) =3
If we simplified all the way, then we'd get:
> (2x +1)(x1) / (x1) = 3
> 2x + 1 = 3
> 2x = 2
> x = 1
BUT x can't equal one because in the problem above, (x  1) can't exist. So the answer to the problem is: "No Solution"
@ptblazer, to write it in that different format for other equations (And this one) would be theoretically inequivalent. In the above, the distinction is not meaningful, but regardless, OP always needs to check for conditions in which x cannot exist.
@stratocophic: No, you cannot just simplify by multiplying things through, while not accounting for "can't divide by zeros": Here's a simple example that clarifies:
Problem: (2x^2  x  1) / (x  1) =3
If we simplified all the way, then we'd get:
> (2x +1)(x1) / (x1) = 3
> 2x + 1 = 3
> 2x = 2
> x = 1
BUT x can't equal one because in the problem above, (x  1) can't exist. So the answer to the problem is: "No Solution"

 Posts: 98
 Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:57 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Ugh... I hate numbers.
 stratocophic
 Posts: 2204
 Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Hence why I said "first order." That's a quadratic equation, which is a second order equation. I don't discount the likelihood that I'm wrong. I'm not the one to be giving mathematical principles, given my sterling 2.0 GPA in college mathematics.glewz wrote:Not true in many cases. Let me settle this and be clear with what I was saying:
@ptblazer, to write it in that different format for other equations (And this one) would be theoretically inequivalent. In the above, the distinction is not meaningful, but regardless, OP always needs to check for conditions in which x cannot exist.
@stratocophic: No, you cannot just simplify by multiplying things through, while not accounting for "can't divide by zeros": Here's a simple example that clarifies:
Problem: (2x^2  x  1) / (x  1) =3
If we simplified all the way, then we'd get:
> (2x +1)(x1) / (x1) = 3
> 2x + 1 = 3
> 2x = 2
> x = 1
BUT x can't equal one because in the problem above, (x  1) can't exist. So the answer to the problem is: "No Solution"

 Posts: 376
 Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
glewz wrote:Not true in many cases. Let me settle this and be clear with what I was saying:
Problem: (2x^2  x  1) / (x  1) =3
If we simplified all the way, then we'd get:
> (2x +1)(x1) / (x1) = 3
> 2x + 1 = 3
> 2x = 2
> x = 1
BUT x can't equal one because in the problem above, (x  1) can't exist. So the answer to the problem is: "No Solution"
I see what you are saying now.
Last edited by ptblazer on Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 stratocophic
 Posts: 2204
 Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Not sure, but I think you can use DiffEQ to solve for the second solution, because the quadratic formula's obviously not going to workptblazer wrote:glewz wrote:Not true in many cases. Let me settle this and be clear with what I was saying:
Problem: (2x^2  x  1) / (x  1) =3
If we simplified all the way, then we'd get:
> (2x +1)(x1) / (x1) = 3
> 2x + 1 = 3
> 2x = 2
> x = 1
BUT x can't equal one because in the problem above, (x  1) can't exist. So the answer to the problem is: "No Solution"
I see what you are saying now. I really hate stirring things up, but you're wrong here. The answer isn't no solution, because x = 1 isn't the only solution. This is a quadratic equation (x^2), meaning there are two answers. In this case what you said in your original post is appropriate and would apply. The answer (X=?, don't care to find it) is correct, only because x=1 is not a valid answer.
 rinkrat19
 Posts: 13923
 Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Wow, flashbacks to 8th grade math.

 Posts: 376
 Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
stratocophic wrote:ptblazer wrote:I see what you are saying now. I really hate stirring things up, but you're wrong here. The answer isn't no solution, because x = 1 isn't the only solution. This is a quadratic equation (x^2), meaning there are two answers. In this case what you said in your original post is appropriate and would apply. The answer (X=?, don't care to find it) is correct, only because x=1 is not a valid answer.
Not sure, but I think you can use DiffEQ to solve for the second solution, because the quadratic formula's obviously not going to work
I meant to address this before. You're right that you can make most first order equation into a "divide by zero" issue, which is why you need to simplfy first. Also, I'm pretty sure the quadratic equation would work, but you need to make the equation look like XXXXX = 0 first.
I actually like math quite a bit (although not claiming to be good at it) so if it seems like I'm "too" engaged in this topic, its because I am. Opportunities to discuss math rarely come up in the pursuit of a law degree, so this brief distraction is nice.
 stratocophic
 Posts: 2204
 Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
Right, but in doing so don't you make it first order anyway in this case since the x1 cancels? It took me one semester to forget almost all of the calculus I knew, now that it's been over 2 years I've got nothing left but bits and pieces of everythingptblazer wrote:stratocophic wrote:ptblazer wrote:I see what you are saying now. I really hate stirring things up, but you're wrong here. The answer isn't no solution, because x = 1 isn't the only solution. This is a quadratic equation (x^2), meaning there are two answers. In this case what you said in your original post is appropriate and would apply. The answer (X=?, don't care to find it) is correct, only because x=1 is not a valid answer.
Not sure, but I think you can use DiffEQ to solve for the second solution, because the quadratic formula's obviously not going to work
I meant to address this before. You're right that you can make most first order equation into a "divide by zero" issue, which is why you need to simplfy first. Also, I'm pretty sure the quadratic equation would work, but you need to make the equation look like XXXXX = 0 first.
I actually like math quite a bit (although not claiming to be good at it) so if it seems like I'm "too" engaged in this topic, its because I am. Opportunities to discuss math rarely come up in the pursuit of a law degree, so this brief distraction is nice.

 Posts: 376
 Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: I suck at math, please help me
stratocophic wrote:Right, but in doing so don't you make it first order anyway in this case since the x1 cancels? It took me one semester to forget almost all of the calculus I knew, now that it's been over 2 years I've got nothing left but bits and pieces of everything
(2x^2  x  1) / (x  1) =3
(2x^2  x  1) = 3x 3
2x^2  4x + 2 = 0
(2x  2)(x  1) = 0
well shit, haha... I owe glewz an apology. Turns out both answers are x=1 and the answer to this problem is no solution. Should have solved it in the first place.
Return to â€śForum for Law School Studentsâ€?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests