jcole87 wrote:The sad thing is, I am a pharmacy consultant now and I deal with a lot of medical forums. This is by far the most unprofessional community I have EVER come across. I sure hope you don't practice law ScrabbleCHamp, and if you do, you should be shut down.
What would be the point of law school and nobody ignorant went there?
Yea, I am moving on. Top-law-schools- worst source of information is Real Time and The Daily Show were created.
In need of a straight shooter Forum
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: In need of a straight shooter
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
Man, if I had a nickel for every craigslist ad I posted with the same title as this thread....
-
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:47 am
Re: In need of a straight shooter
Normally I'm not one to nitpick, and I agree that many TLSers do go a bit over the top...
Yeah, TLSers go way out of bounds. I've found that many TLSers don't like being called a punk. I've also found it doesn't indicate a matured individual capable of much contrition.Jcole, please stick around. We want to help you (and this thread has a lot of potential).
I personally don't care for carjackers. But that's just me. You know I have a wife, mother, sisters, etc. And I get a bit defensive about personal safety.
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
Clearly he's not a carjacker. He just helps them after they jack cars.kublaikahn wrote:Normally I'm not one to nitpick, and I agree that many TLSers do go a bit over the top...Yeah, TLSers go way out of bounds. I've found that many TLSers don't like being called a punk. I've also found it doesn't indicate a matured individual capable of much contrition.Jcole, please stick around. We want to help you (and this thread has a lot of potential).
I personally don't care for carjackers. But that's just me. You know I have a wife, mother, sisters, etc. And I get a bit defensive about personal safety.
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:14 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:18 am
Re: In need of a straight shooter
I think it was pretty clear from the context that that is what he was saying.amorfati wrote:I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
I know that his posts aren't extremely transparent, but your second sentence is really the only possible way it can be taken seeing as he was originally charged as a primary and pleaded down to assist after the fact.amorfati wrote:I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
Also, what the hell are you trying to say? I see subject, present tense verb, d.o., d.o, past progressive verb. The hell language is that?jcole87 wrote: Yea, I am moving on. Top-law-schools- worst source of information is Real Time and The Daily Show were created.
-
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
I agree, it was pretty obvious to me too. Also, he has a point about this forum. Trolling or not, the level of cynicism here is disguisting. If you think someone is trolling, ignore the thread. Putting someone down or simply trying to get your name on every thread doesn't do any good to anyone.BeenDidThat wrote:I think it was pretty clear from the context that that is what he was saying.amorfati wrote:I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
Seriously, especially to new comers it can be awful. My very first post I was called a cunt because I was stressed about my LSAT score.ptblazer wrote:I agree, it was pretty obvious to me too. Also, he has a point about this forum. Trolling or not, the level of cynicism here is disguisting. If you think someone is trolling, ignore the thread. Putting someone down or simply trying to get your name on every thread doesn't do any good to anyone.BeenDidThat wrote:I think it was pretty clear from the context that that is what he was saying.amorfati wrote:I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
On the other hand, OP should grow a thicker skin if he wants to survive in this world, especially if that survival is to include internet use. I was on more cynical forums in '96. This isn't a new phenomena.ptblazer wrote:I agree, it was pretty obvious to me too. Also, he has a point about this forum. Trolling or not, the level of cynicism here is disguisting. If you think someone is trolling, ignore the thread. Putting someone down or simply trying to get your name on every thread doesn't do any good to anyone.BeenDidThat wrote:I think it was pretty clear from the context that that is what he was saying.amorfati wrote:I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
Were you being one?Hey-O wrote:Seriously, especially to new comers it can be awful. My very first post I was called a cunt because I was stressed about my LSAT score.ptblazer wrote:I agree, it was pretty obvious to me too. Also, he has a point about this forum. Trolling or not, the level of cynicism here is disguisting. If you think someone is trolling, ignore the thread. Putting someone down or simply trying to get your name on every thread doesn't do any good to anyone.BeenDidThat wrote:I think it was pretty clear from the context that that is what he was saying.amorfati wrote:I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
-
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
geoduck wrote:On the other hand, OP should grow a thicker skin if he wants to survive in this world, especially if that survival is to include internet use. I was on more cynical forums in '96. This isn't a new phenomena.ptblazer wrote:I agree, it was pretty obvious to me too. Also, he has a point about this forum. Trolling or not, the level of cynicism here is disguisting. If you think someone is trolling, ignore the thread. Putting someone down or simply trying to get your name on every thread doesn't do any good to anyone.BeenDidThat wrote:I think it was pretty clear from the context that that is what he was saying.amorfati wrote:I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
NO! Blaming the victim is adolescent, this is a forum of college graduates (or soon to be).
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2005
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am
Re: In need of a straight shooter
If this isn't a troll you might want to consult an attorney or state bar character and fitness expert. As things stand I think you will probably be in trouble because the crime involved sounds very serious, and yet it sounds to me like you have a flippant attitude about the whole thing.
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
Where is the victim? He posted a fairly opaque statement about some crime and his lack of retail eligibility and then attacked the people who asked him to clarify his statement so we could even give him advice. From his initial post he could've been freaking out about having shoplifted a twinkie or from committing rape, murder and cannibalism. It was after he attacked the questions that someone suggested a troll label. Considering that calling almost anything a troll has been an internet meme since the mid 90s, this on its own would hardly be notable. When it was claimed after the OP engaged in the troll-like behavior of a vague post with ridiculous follow ups, it was more or less justified.ptblazer wrote:
NO! Blaming the victim is adolescent, this is a forum of college graduates (or soon to be).
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
pretty sure the victim is in the trunk of her cargeoduck wrote:Where is the victim? He posted a fairly opaque statement about some crime and his lack of retail eligibility and then attacked the people who asked him to clarify his statement so we could even give him advice. From his initial post he could've been freaking out about having shoplifted a twinkie or from committing rape, murder and cannibalism. It was after he attacked the questions that someone suggested a troll label. Considering that calling almost anything a troll has been an internet meme since the mid 90s, this on its own would hardly be notable. When it was claimed after the OP engaged in the troll-like behavior of a vague post with ridiculous follow ups, it was more or less justified.ptblazer wrote:
NO! Blaming the victim is adolescent, this is a forum of college graduates (or soon to be).
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
And apparently missing a loin and a bit of backfat.fatduck wrote: pretty sure the victim is in the trunk of her car
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
I completely agree that it was opaque and needed to clearified. But you're distorting what happend. First response asked him to write it in English, not, can you clearify?, or what does THIS mean?. Second post agreed and the third one called him a stupid troll. Then the next two made a joke about his situation. So he got defensive. Finally about half way down the page someone asked him to "explain what you did." And he promptly answered what his offenses were.geoduck wrote:Where is the victim? He posted a fairly opaque statement about some crime and his lack of retail eligibility and then attacked the people who asked him to clarify his statement so we could even give him advice. From his initial post he could've been freaking out about having shoplifted a twinkie or from committing rape, murder and cannibalism. It was after he attacked the questions that someone suggested a troll label. Considering that calling almost anything a troll has been an internet meme since the mid 90s, this on its own would hardly be notable. When it was claimed after the OP engaged in the troll-like behavior of a vague post with ridiculous follow ups, it was more or less justified.ptblazer wrote:
NO! Blaming the victim is adolescent, this is a forum of college graduates (or soon to be).
- superhands
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:12 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
That is not a very nice thing to say, however, it is one of the funniest things that I have read on this forum.Hey-O wrote:Seriously, especially to new comers it can be awful. My very first post I was called a cunt because I was stressed about my LSAT score.ptblazer wrote:I agree, it was pretty obvious to me too. Also, he has a point about this forum. Trolling or not, the level of cynicism here is disguisting. If you think someone is trolling, ignore the thread. Putting someone down or simply trying to get your name on every thread doesn't do any good to anyone.BeenDidThat wrote:I think it was pretty clear from the context that that is what he was saying.amorfati wrote:I'm seriously curious about this "guilty until proven innocent" philosophy - it just doesn't sound congruent with the story.
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
I agree, it was pretty obvious to me too. Also, he has a point about this forum. Trolling or not, the level of cynicism here is disguisting. If you think someone is trolling, ignore the thread. Putting someone down or simply trying to get your name on every thread doesn't do any good to anyone.[/quote]superhands wrote:I think it was pretty clear from the context that that is what he was saying.Hey-O wrote:
...maybe OP is saying that's the way the system really operates, not that he agrees with it? that would make more sense, I guess.
Seriously, especially to new comers it can be awful. My very first post I was called a cunt because I was stressed about my LSAT score.[/quote]
That is not a very nice thing to say, however, it is one of the funniest things that I have read on this forum.[/quote]
In retrospect it was really funny. It was a throwaway account. Two posts, called me a cunt and that's about it. Driveby cunting.
- Marionberry
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:24 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
Hey-O wrote: Driveby cunting.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
I'd suggest you read it again. The total hostility was one guy saying "Stupid troll. Try harder." to which he gave an extremely douchy response that still clarified nothing. Than he double posted to say:ptblazer wrote:
I completely agree that it was opaque and needed to clearified. But you're distorting what happend. First response asked him to write it in English, not, can you clearify?, or what does THIS mean?. Second post agreed and the third one called him a stupid troll. Then the next two made a joke about his situation. So he got defensive. Finally about half way down the page someone asked him to "explain what you did." And he promptly answered what his offenses were.
And proceeded to post again attacking fatduck for taking a vaguely humorous reading of his analogy. That analogy still makes no sense as he never explained what actually happened. As it stands, his analogy makes no sense. He also answered Scrabble's same serious post twice, the second time with a rude link (I didn't click it cause I'm at work... just looked at the url). Then, he throws a tantrum because a couple people throw out lame humourous retorts to his rather vicious attacks. And then he peaces out.Now I get it.
These forums are full of pre-law punks who have no outlet for all their mommy hatred.
Obviously asked this question on the wrong forums. This community is worse than lady Gaga's followers, ALL of them."
- Marionberry
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:24 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
I agree that OP was pretty weird, and that his reaction to peoples' lighthearted jabs and troll accusations was extreme. However, the widespread condescencion and snide remarks on this site are pretty tiresome. People defend it in a number of ways, but people get off on being mean. I've been guilty of it too, and I understand why people do it, but the fact that is isn't just tolerated on this site but celebrated is what's really obnoxious.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: In need of a straight shooter
To be fair, this site gets trolled hard.
- geoduck
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:29 pm
Re: In need of a straight shooter
He asked for a straight shooter; he should've expected the guns.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login