Re: 1L grade waiting thread
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:05 pm
Last night I added "job application" dreams to the fun.Borhas wrote:law school dreams? That's grimy as hell, I recommend blacking out every night in that case
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=141064
Last night I added "job application" dreams to the fun.Borhas wrote:law school dreams? That's grimy as hell, I recommend blacking out every night in that case
lol, never said I don't do that, too. Law school still manages to invade my subconscious.Borhas wrote:law school dreams? That's grimy as hell, I recommend blacking out every night in that case
I will end up with really horrifying law school dreams instead of just unnerving ones.Borhas wrote:law school dreams? That's grimy as hell, I recommend blacking out every night in that case
So did I, only it was true. But at least I'm finally done now : )zeth006 wrote:Yeah, had a dream last night that I still had a final to take.
shadow. wrote:In the same section as D.H20man
Contracts- A
Con Lawl- A+
LRW- A-
I am embarrassed by your lack of bravado, H20man. Patterson was EZ.
shadow. wrote:In the same section as D.H20man
Contracts- A
Con Lawl- A+
LRW- A-
I am embarrassed by your lack of bravado, H20man. Patterson was EZ.
sorry if this isnt a direct answer to your question (im terrible at math), but; your curve distributes 35% A/A-s??? jealousgwuorbust wrote:so say someone got stright B+ grades at a school where 35% get A/A-; 50% get B+/B/B-; 15% get C+ or below. Where would said theoretical person end up rank wise?
Was that exam easy or hard? Fuck it I don't even remember what was on it.D. H2Oman wrote:shadow. wrote:In the same section as D.H20man
Contracts- A
Con Lawl- A+
LRW- A-
I am embarrassed by your lack of bravado, H20man. Patterson was EZ.
LLALALAALALALA that exam was hard LALALALALALALALALALALALLALA the curve is gonna be easy LALALALALLLALALALALLLLLLLAAAA cant' hear you LALALALALLLAALA
EZZindras wrote:Was that exam easy or hard? Fuck it I don't even remember what was on it.D. H2Oman wrote:shadow. wrote:In the same section as D.H20man
Contracts- A
Con Lawl- A+
LRW- A-
I am embarrassed by your lack of bravado, H20man. Patterson was EZ.
LLALALAALALALA that exam was hard LALALALALALALALALALALALLALA the curve is gonna be easy LALALALALLLALALALALLLLLLLAAAA cant' hear you LALALALALLLAALA
shadow. wrote:EZZindras wrote:
Was that exam easy or hard? Fuck it I don't even remember what was on it.
R.2d 15 + 87(2) + WHO KNOWS CUZ IVE BEEN WASTED SINCE DEC 7
who's excited for WEEK 1?? I KNOW I AM
Recommended distribution at UT is 35% A+/A/A-, 55% B+/B/B-, and 10% C+ or below and we are at a 3.3 median. So all B+'s here would be median. Maybe it's a little above median where you're at?gwuorbust wrote:so say someone got stright B+ grades at a school where 35% get A/A-; 50% get B+/B/B-; 15% get C+ or below. Where would said theoretical person end up rank wise?
On a related note, on a 3.3 median curve, say that 35% of the distribution had to be A's or A-. Does that mean out of a class of 100 students, 35 will get an A or A-?Richie Tenenbaum wrote:Recommended distribution at UT is 35% A+/A/A-, 55% B+/B/B-, and 10% C+ or below and we are at a 3.3 median. So all B+'s here would be median. Maybe it's a little above median where you're at?gwuorbust wrote:so say someone got stright B+ grades at a school where 35% get A/A-; 50% get B+/B/B-; 15% get C+ or below. Where would said theoretical person end up rank wise?
We have a mandatory curve for 1L large sections where 30-40% must be A+,A,A-. The mean for each class must be between 3.25 and 3.35. So yeah, it could be less than 35% depending on how many A's (or A+'s for those on a 4.3 curve) and how many low grades the professor gives out.solotee wrote:On a related note, on a 3.3 median curve, say that 35% of the distribution had to be A's or A-. Does that mean out of a class of 100 students, 35 will get an A or A-?Richie Tenenbaum wrote:Recommended distribution at UT is 35% A+/A/A-, 55% B+/B/B-, and 10% C+ or below and we are at a 3.3 median. So all B+'s here would be median. Maybe it's a little above median where you're at?gwuorbust wrote:so say someone got stright B+ grades at a school where 35% get A/A-; 50% get B+/B/B-; 15% get C+ or below. Where would said theoretical person end up rank wise?
Or could it be less than that if the professor gives out more A's than A-'s?
The more I think about it, the more sure I am that I got bottom 1/3 in civpro. Median in everything else, except possibly bottom 1/3 in contracts. Good thing everyone at T14s is guaranteed a job, right???mths wrote:fuck
I'm scared
At UCLA the 3.3 curve distributes more towards the middle, rather than top/bottom heavy (around 27% A/A- and just a handful of C's), but professors split the A's and A-'s evenly. so in a hypothetical class of 100, around 13 kids will get A's, and 13 kids will get A-'s.solotee wrote:On a related note, on a 3.3 median curve, say that 35% of the distribution had to be A's or A-. Does that mean out of a class of 100 students, 35 will get an A or A-?Richie Tenenbaum wrote:Recommended distribution at UT is 35% A+/A/A-, 55% B+/B/B-, and 10% C+ or below and we are at a 3.3 median. So all B+'s here would be median. Maybe it's a little above median where you're at?gwuorbust wrote:so say someone got stright B+ grades at a school where 35% get A/A-; 50% get B+/B/B-; 15% get C+ or below. Where would said theoretical person end up rank wise?
Or could it be less than that if the professor gives out more A's than A-'s?