Ex. where mirror image rule isn't the mode of acceptance

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
irish017
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:19 pm

Ex. where mirror image rule isn't the mode of acceptance

Postby irish017 » Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:01 am

In this case would the D be following the mirror imagine rule?

Offeror: I will give you $100 to paint my house.

Offeree: I accept your offer and will paint thy abode.

Is this an example of an offeree not using the mirror image rule but rather using a reasonably acceptable mode of acceptance?

It seems to me like it would since it is the acceptance of an offer without modifications.

User avatar
skoobily doobily
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:40 pm

Re: Ex. where mirror image rule isn't the mode of acceptance

Postby skoobily doobily » Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:57 am

irish017 wrote:In this case would the D be following the mirror imagine rule?

Offeror: I will give you $100 to paint my house.

Offeree: I accept your offer and will paint thy abode.

Is this an example of an offeree not using the mirror image rule but rather using a reasonably acceptable mode of acceptance?

It seems to me like it would since it is the acceptance of an offer without modifications.

Question does not compute.

User avatar
Sogui
Posts: 621
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am

Re: Ex. where mirror image rule isn't the mode of acceptance

Postby Sogui » Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:47 am

lol how are they teaching contracts in other schools?

Mirror-image only kicks in when UCC doesn't apply/opted-out, and when it does it only means that there is no valid contract where an offer and acceptance state different terms.

A: "I will pay you $100 to paint my house red"
B: "I accept, I will paint your house blue"

There's no contract there. If you say nothing and let B paint your house anyway, then last-shot rule kicks in and you have to pay B.

irish017
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:19 pm

Re: Ex. where mirror image rule isn't the mode of acceptance

Postby irish017 » Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:42 pm

lol/

k exam over.

didn't even need to know mirror image rule hence why i was so confused....we never went over it.

random5483
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:17 pm

Re: Ex. where mirror image rule isn't the mode of acceptance

Postby random5483 » Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:30 pm

Mirror image rule applies to common law / CISG. Does not apply to the UCC. Not sure exactly what you are asking, but since painting a house is a common law situation, the mirror image rule would apply.

The rule only requires that acceptance mirrors the offer. Basically, a qualified acceptance or an acceptance with even minor terms that are different is not an acceptance per the common law mirror image rule. The UCC discards the mirror image rule and has its own criteria for acceptances (laxer rules).




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: lymenheimer and 7 guests