I think its pretty clear that under the Common Law circumstantial evidence can be used by the prosecution to establish the actus reus of a conspiracy (in jurisdictions where no overt act is required), but does anyone know if this is also true under the Model Penal Code?
(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
2 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:18 pm
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:16 am
yup. It's pretty much the only way to prove conspiracy, outside of a confession.