Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:emorystud2010 wrote:i just had sex
Well, there goes your write on.
I dunno man. I think sex increases my performance. Less stress.
Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:emorystud2010 wrote:i just had sex
Well, there goes your write on.
Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:emorystud2010 wrote:i just had sex
Well, there goes your write on.
emorystud2010 wrote:mths wrote:Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:emorystud2010 wrote:i just had sex
Well, there goes your write on.
I thought you were the same person
Aka ur mind has now been blown
BarbellDreams wrote:So here is what the fact pattern was for my civ pro essay portion of the exam. 2 P's sue 2D's, each D wants to implead 2 parties, all 4 of the impleaded parties have cross and counterclaims. One impleaded asshole decides he wants to certify a defense as a class action, 20 members from the class object as improper class action and then decide to sue the impleaded party for some other stuff. Meanwhile, one of the original Ps for some reason decides to join a third D and supplement some BS claims. There are about 3 summary judgments filed and need to be resolved, the pleading of the original case was REALLY screwed up, D's object to every single interogatory of discovery. After the case is resolved there are about 6 different suits filed by new parties that have not been brought up before that all want some sort of collateral estoppel and/or claim preclusion.
We had 60 mins to analyze all of this.NO ONE I spoke with finished this exam. The 2L's from this prof's class year all told me that no one in their class finished her exam. I literally was reading the fcat pattern and about 2/3rds of the way in I literally said "What the fuck is going on?" under my breath.
mths wrote:Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:emorystud2010 wrote:i just had sex
Well, there goes your write on.
I thought you were the same person
Rurik wrote:BarbellDreams wrote:So here is what the fact pattern was for my civ pro essay portion of the exam. 2 P's sue 2D's, each D wants to implead 2 parties, all 4 of the impleaded parties have cross and counterclaims. One impleaded asshole decides he wants to certify a defense as a class action, 20 members from the class object as improper class action and then decide to sue the impleaded party for some other stuff. Meanwhile, one of the original Ps for some reason decides to join a third D and supplement some BS claims. There are about 3 summary judgments filed and need to be resolved, the pleading of the original case was REALLY screwed up, D's object to every single interogatory of discovery. After the case is resolved there are about 6 different suits filed by new parties that have not been brought up before that all want some sort of collateral estoppel and/or claim preclusion.
We had 60 mins to analyze all of this.NO ONE I spoke with finished this exam. The 2L's from this prof's class year all told me that no one in their class finished her exam. I literally was reading the fcat pattern and about 2/3rds of the way in I literally said "What the fuck is going on?" under my breath.
![]()
The curve has to be ftw though
emorystud2010 wrote:Desert Fox wrote:emorystud2010 wrote:i just had sex
Did you cry the whole time?
Hell yeah i did. As Akon says "Doesn't matter. Still counts."
Btw (maybe this should be a thread), do ppl actually cry during/after sex?
dakatz wrote:emorystud2010 wrote:Desert Fox wrote:emorystud2010 wrote:i just had sex
Did you cry the whole time?
Hell yeah i did. As Akon says "Doesn't matter. Still counts."
Btw (maybe this should be a thread), do ppl actually cry during/after sex?
Only if it involves ConLaw
YourCaptain wrote:
Sex = Babies
Babies = Gerber baby food
Gerber baby food = Walmart
Walmart = trucks going nationwide!!!!
Congress can regulate it
mbusch22 wrote:YourCaptain wrote:
Sex = Babies
Babies = Gerber baby food
Gerber baby food = Walmart
Walmart = trucks going nationwide!!!!
Congress can regulate it
I'm so happy I'm done with Con Law (part I, that is)
keg411 wrote:mbusch22 wrote:YourCaptain wrote:
Sex = Babies
Babies = Gerber baby food
Gerber baby food = Walmart
Walmart = trucks going nationwide!!!!
Congress can regulate it
I'm so happy I'm done with Con Law (part I, that is)
You have to take more ConLawl.
keg411 wrote:If I can avoid it, I plan on never taking conlawl again. I even decided to take a UCC class instead of criminal procedure just to get away from it temporarily (though I know crim pro is really the "interesting" part of conlawl since it's mostly search and seizure stuff).
Although when I get my grades back and realize my corporate dream is dead, I'd probably be better off in CrimPro.
rad law wrote:keg411 wrote:If I can avoid it, I plan on never taking conlawl again. I even decided to take a UCC class instead of criminal procedure just to get away from it temporarily (though I know crim pro is really the "interesting" part of conlawl since it's mostly search and seizure stuff).
Although when I get my grades back and realize my corporate dream is dead, I'd probably be better off in CrimPro.
I did a crim pro type class and it was awesome. Looking forward to crim pro strangely enough even though I hate con law.
traehekat wrote:rad law wrote:keg411 wrote:If I can avoid it, I plan on never taking conlawl again. I even decided to take a UCC class instead of criminal procedure just to get away from it temporarily (though I know crim pro is really the "interesting" part of conlawl since it's mostly search and seizure stuff).
Although when I get my grades back and realize my corporate dream is dead, I'd probably be better off in CrimPro.
I did a crim pro type class and it was awesome. Looking forward to crim pro strangely enough even though I hate con law.
con law itself is pretty interesting, but not fun to be tested on. also taking crim pro next semester, def looking forward to it.
btw, ill call keg getting at LEAST an A- on the con law exam.
keg411 wrote:You people suck![]()
.
dakatz wrote:keg411 wrote:You people suck![]()
.
I'll one up you guys and guess A
traehekat wrote:dakatz wrote:keg411 wrote:You people suck![]()
.
I'll one up you guys and guess A
hell, in less than 10 years i'll bet she is TEACHING that shit.
keg411 wrote:traehekat wrote:dakatz wrote:keg411 wrote:You people suck![]()
.
I'll one up you guys and guess A
hell, in less than 10 years i'll bet she is TEACHING that shit.![]()
![]()
traehekat wrote:dakatz wrote:keg411 wrote:You people suck![]()
.
I'll one up you guys and guess A
hell, in less than 10 years i'll bet she is TEACHING that shit.