BarbellDreams wrote:I sent the spreadsheet/outline to all those that PM'ed me, if anyone else is interested let me know.
ty, very solid it looks like.
BarbellDreams wrote:I sent the spreadsheet/outline to all those that PM'ed me, if anyone else is interested let me know.
Always Credited wrote:I think I'm missing something in RAP, because it seems easy to me.
Always Credited wrote:I think I'm missing something in RAP, because it seems easy to me.
traehekat wrote:pleasetryagain wrote:YourCaptain wrote:I think that 1367 and the preclusion doctrines were meticulously designed to be frustrating.
core concepts are really simple. applying them, not so much. especially when you throw in the 1441(c) dilemma. at least 40% of my civ pro studying has been devoted to understanding supp. jurisdiction and removal under 1441(c). makes erie look like paint by numbers.
like RAP in property, i plan on barely studying/understanding supp. jurisdiction and praying it isn't heavily tested on the exam.
Helmholtz wrote:traehekat wrote:pleasetryagain wrote:YourCaptain wrote:I think that 1367 and the preclusion doctrines were meticulously designed to be frustrating.
core concepts are really simple. applying them, not so much. especially when you throw in the 1441(c) dilemma. at least 40% of my civ pro studying has been devoted to understanding supp. jurisdiction and removal under 1441(c). makes erie look like paint by numbers.
like RAP in property, i plan on barely studying/understanding supp. jurisdiction and praying it isn't heavily tested on the exam.
We started to fall a little behind in civpro, so the last week and a half of classes are slated to be: Gibbs, Aldinger, Kroger, Finley, Exxon Mobil, Swift, Erie, Guaranty Trust, Byrd, Hanna, and Gasperini.
Helmholtz wrote:traehekat wrote:pleasetryagain wrote:YourCaptain wrote:I think that 1367 and the preclusion doctrines were meticulously designed to be frustrating.
core concepts are really simple. applying them, not so much. especially when you throw in the 1441(c) dilemma. at least 40% of my civ pro studying has been devoted to understanding supp. jurisdiction and removal under 1441(c). makes erie look like paint by numbers.
like RAP in property, i plan on barely studying/understanding supp. jurisdiction and praying it isn't heavily tested on the exam.
We started to fall a little behind in civpro, so the last week and a half of classes are slated to be: Gibbs, Aldinger, Kroger, Finley, Exxon Mobil, Swift, Erie, Guaranty Trust, Byrd, Hanna, and Gasperini.
BarbellDreams wrote:No Shady Grove? Psht, your prof is an amateur!![]()
Seriously though, I absolutely despise Gasperini.
BarbellDreams wrote:No Shady Grove? Psht, your prof is an amateur!![]()
Seriously though, I absolutely despise Gasperini.
Helmholtz wrote:We started to fall a little behind in civpro, so the last week and a half of classes are slated to be: Gibbs, Aldinger, Kroger, Finley, Exxon Mobil, Swift, Erie, Guaranty Trust, Byrd, Hanna, and Gasperini.
rad law wrote:BarbellDreams wrote:No Shady Grove? Psht, your prof is an amateur!![]()
Seriously though, I absolutely despise Gasperini.
We didn't do either of those.
traehekat wrote:yeah i dunno wtf shady grove is. sounds like a retirement home.
snowpeach06 wrote:My teacher literally had us do Erie, and that was it for the Erie doctrine.
snowpeach06 wrote:My teacher literally had us do Erie, and that was it for the Erie doctrine.
jkay wrote:Closed book CivPro exam.
snowpeach06 wrote:jkay wrote:Closed book CivPro exam.
Yeah. I'm not enthused about all the memorizing for all my exams this semester. Well, 2/4. But one, the outline is useless anyway.
Anyway... i wasted my day. I finished a short section of con law, and might finish trademark (the shortest section of my IP survey tonight.) Original goal: have Con Law, Civ Pro and IP done by tonight. Wap wap.
mbusch22 wrote:snowpeach06 wrote:jkay wrote:Closed book CivPro exam.
Yeah. I'm not enthused about all the memorizing for all my exams this semester. Well, 2/4. But one, the outline is useless anyway.
Anyway... i wasted my day. I finished a short section of con law, and might finish trademark (the shortest section of my IP survey tonight.) Original goal: have Con Law, Civ Pro and IP done by tonight. Wap wap.
Just wondering, are you a 1L taking IP? Did you get to choose an elective or something?
kalvano wrote:Mbusch, most schools don't require 6 substantive graded classes for 1L.
kalvano wrote:Mbusch, most schools don't require 6 substantive graded classes for 1L.
Return to “Forum for Law School Students�
Users browsing this forum: griffins94 and 31 guests