His/Her Forum
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:17 pm
His/Her
When referring to an ambiguous pronouns, why do law statements always use 'her' instead of he,him, their, etc?
I.e. "The victim could argue her..." or "defendant need not herself actually contact the victim."
Just curious! Thanks
I.e. "The victim could argue her..." or "defendant need not herself actually contact the victim."
Just curious! Thanks
- dood
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Re: His/Her
When a person hasn't yet hopped on the singular 'they' train, they have to choose between using a gendered word as a gender-neutral word or using an awkward his/her construction.
Singular they, people. Use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magaz ... age-t.html
Singular they, people. Use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magaz ... age-t.html
- mikeytwoshoes
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm
Re: His/Her
Your LRW prof must hate you. Your journal's ed. board would hate you to.yeff wrote:When a person hasn't yet hopped on the singular 'they' train, they have to choose between using a gendered word as a gender-neutral word or using an awkward his/her construction.
Singular they, people. Use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magaz ... age-t.html
- philosoraptor
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:49 am
Re: His/Her
A thousand times no. Idiots who use singular "they" apparently lack the capacity to understand the difference between grammatical gender and anatomy. It adds instead of removes confusion in the language. If you use it, educated people assume you're a buffoon, and rightly so.yeff wrote:When a person hasn't yet hopped on the singular 'they' train, they have to choose between using a gendered word as a gender-neutral word or using an awkward his/her construction.
Singular they, people. Use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magaz ... age-t.html
Your NYT article lists famous authors who might have used it; they, however, wrote literature, not law-related things, where clarity is (or should be) paramount.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:56 am
Re: His/Her
I always find "her" kind of amusing in criminal texts, considering that something like 90% of criminal defendants are male.
It smacks of the publishers trying too hard to be P.C.
It smacks of the publishers trying too hard to be P.C.
- zanda
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:36 am
Re: His/Her
Except that it ruins the whole sentence because when people use the "singular" "they", they use the plural verb. Singular noun, ambiguous pronoun, plural verb. Ewwwwww.yeff wrote:When a person hasn't yet hopped on the singular 'they' train, they have to choose between using a gendered word as a gender-neutral word or using an awkward his/her construction.
Singular they, people. Use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magaz ... age-t.html
- ggocat
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:51 pm
Re: His/Her
Pronouns are for chumps. ggocat does not use pronouns.
- Pizon
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:53 am
Re: His/Her
After reading the generic attorney being referred to as "she" for what seemed like the thousandth time, I began to develop an inferiority complex.
- TobiasFunke
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:38 pm
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:46 pm
Re: His/Her
"Her" is preferred because it's more easily pronounced than "his", at least in terms of mouth movement.
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Re: His/Her
He? she? xe? he/she? These are really better?
First, this problem can often be easily written around. From OP's example: "defendant need not personally actually contact the victim."
For the other example, I really don't understand the disgust with "The victim could argue their..."
Moreover, if "they" it proves unsuitable for legal use due to imprecision (hasn't yet, but I'm just a 1L), there's no good reason it can't be used in common speech.
First, this problem can often be easily written around. From OP's example: "defendant need not personally actually contact the victim."
For the other example, I really don't understand the disgust with "The victim could argue their..."
Moreover, if "they" it proves unsuitable for legal use due to imprecision (hasn't yet, but I'm just a 1L), there's no good reason it can't be used in common speech.
- reasonable_man
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:41 pm
Re: His/Her
yeff wrote:When a person hasn't yet hopped on the singular 'they' train, they have to choose between using a gendered word as a gender-neutral word or using an awkward his/her construction.
Singular they, people. Use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magaz ... age-t.html
Yes. Use this. But not if you intend to be an attorney. "They" in legal writing? Really? For real? Seriously? And you're so sure about it too!
Anyway. If I'm writing to a female judge, i use her. Otherwise, I typically default to he/his, when it becomes necessary to assign a gender.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Pizon
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:53 am
Re: His/Her
You can usually just avoid the issue by making it plural, since you weren't talking about anyone specific in the first place.
"The attorney must file her papers." --> "Attorneys must file their papers."
"The attorney must file her papers." --> "Attorneys must file their papers."
-
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Re: His/Her
Exactly. That's how it felt to women when everyone used "he."Pizon wrote:After reading the generic attorney being referred to as "she" for what seemed like the thousandth time, I began to develop an inferiority complex.
It's interesting to me that people care about this so much.
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:48 pm
Re: His/Her
In the preface to his Torts book, Professor Epstein writes that where there is no specific gender necessary, he uses she/her for plaintiffs and he/him for defendants.
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:56 am
Re: His/Her
Ahhh...but men were in the legal profession first.Bumi wrote:Exactly. That's how it felt to women when everyone used "he."Pizon wrote:After reading the generic attorney being referred to as "she" for what seemed like the thousandth time, I began to develop an inferiority complex.
It's interesting to me that people care about this so much.
If women wanted the right to use THEIR pronoun, THEY should have invented the profession!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- rdcws000
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:41 pm
Re: His/Her
That seems awkwardly sexist.LjakW wrote:In the preface to his Torts book, Professor Epstein writes that where there is no specific gender necessary, he uses she/her for plaintiffs and he/him for defendants.
I use she/her in formal writing, not to be PC or anything, just to stay consistent. Using the fence stradding "he or she" and "his or her" is burdensome. "They" is totally off limits.
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: His/Her
I am a Grand Wizard of the singular "they" conspiracy. But we need to know our limits. Until it's a majority rule of usage, it has no place in legal writing.reasonable_man wrote:yeff wrote:When a person hasn't yet hopped on the singular 'they' train, they have to choose between using a gendered word as a gender-neutral word or using an awkward his/her construction.
Singular they, people. Use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magaz ... age-t.html
Yes. Use this. But not if you intend to be an attorney. "They" in legal writing? Really? For real? Seriously? And you're so sure about it too!
Anyway. If I'm writing to a female judge, i use her. Otherwise, I typically default to he/his, when it becomes necessary to assign a gender.
- Adjudicator
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am
Re: His/Her
Singular "they" is terrible, no person should ever use it, especially not if they are (or want to be) a lawyer.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rdcws000
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:41 pm
Re: His/Her
Alternative.Adjudicator wrote:Singular "they" is terrible, no person should ever use it, especially not if that person istheyare(or wants to be) a lawyer.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: His/Her
*Whoosh*rdcws000 wrote:Alternative.Adjudicator wrote:Singular "they" is terrible, no person should ever use it, especially not if that person istheyare(or wants to be) a lawyer.
- rdcws000
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:41 pm
Re: His/Her
I got it...bk187 wrote:*Whoosh*rdcws000 wrote:Alternative.Adjudicator wrote:Singular "they" is terrible, no person should ever use it, especially not if that person istheyare(or wants to be) a lawyer.
I just felt like what it was missing was an alternative to her, his, his or her, or they, so I included it.
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Re: His/Her
Fair enough. Though Grand Wizard sounds a little klan-ish.Renzo wrote:I am a Grand Wizard of the singular "they" conspiracy. But we need to know our limits. Until it's a majority rule of usage, it has no place in legal writing.reasonable_man wrote:yeff wrote:When a person hasn't yet hopped on the singular 'they' train, they have to choose between using a gendered word as a gender-neutral word or using an awkward his/her construction.
Singular they, people. Use it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magaz ... age-t.html
Yes. Use this. But not if you intend to be an attorney. "They" in legal writing? Really? For real? Seriously? And you're so sure about it too!
Anyway. If I'm writing to a female judge, i use her. Otherwise, I typically default to he/his, when it becomes necessary to assign a gender.
How else to return it to majority usage if not strident advocacy? And if your career suffers for your use of it, well, that just serves as further proof of your dedication to the cause!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login