Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere Forum
- Mike12188
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:07 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Kalvano's sole purpose for posting on TLS is to convince people he's smart and SMU is a great law school. It never works.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
LSAT 25% = 155 LOLMike12188 wrote:Kalvano's sole purpose for posting on TLS is to convince people he's smart and SMU is a great law school. It never works.
- Na_Swatch
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Oh cmon, this just taking things a little too far... He didn't mean that there are only smart people in T14 or none outside of it...kalvano wrote:Helmholtz wrote:Of course intelligence and highly-ranked law schools are not mutually inclusive. Who implied that?marshponds wrote:Of course they're harder. What makes an exam hard isn't the question being asked but the people against whom you are graded.
But seriously, the difficulty of law school tests definitely depends heavily on the competition you're facing. You need to understand what exactly a 0.4 correlation means in terms of Standard Deviations of LSAT and GPA...
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Mike12188 wrote:Kalvano's sole purpose for posting on TLS is to convince people he's smart and SMU is a great law school. It never works.
An interesting position to take. Tell me, are you always a fucking douchebag, or just making a particular effort for me?
Juding by your past posts, I can tell that:
1) You seem not to like me despite never having had any meaningful interaction whatsoever, which makes me think you're an alt.
2) Conpared to you, I'm Einstein.
Regardless, the astonishingly tiny part of your brain that allows for rational thought must have already shut off for the night.
- Mike12188
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:07 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Hey Einstein you spelled "compared" wrongkalvano wrote:Mike12188 wrote:Kalvano's sole purpose for posting on TLS is to convince people he's smart and SMU is a great law school. It never works.
An interesting position to take. Tell me, are you always a fucking douchebag, or just making a particular effort for me?
Juding by your past posts, I can tell that:
1) You seem not to like me despite never having had any meaningful interaction whatsoever, which makes me think you're an alt.
2) Conpared to you, I'm Einstein.
Regardless, the astonishingly tiny part of your brain that allows for rational thought must have already shut off for the night.
EDIT: And the rational part of my brain shut off after my midterm, but from your arguments I see rationality is not a requirement for posting in this thread
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
So you're just a total fucking douchebag all the time. Got it.
And judging by your LSAT practice scores, you are proving me right - high LSAT doesn't mean intelligent.
And judging by your LSAT practice scores, you are proving me right - high LSAT doesn't mean intelligent.
- JG Hall
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:18 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Back to the topic...
Exams are different at NYU/CLS than at Pace or NYLS or some other TTT NY school because they typically learn black letter law at TTTs.
Exams are different at NYU/CLS than at Pace or NYLS or some other TTT NY school because they typically learn black letter law at TTTs.
- 2807
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:23 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Bahahahah...
Prison Mike ! That is too funny.
Prison Mike ! That is too funny.
- Mike12188
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:07 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Practice scores? did you just look through my posts for some dirt?kalvano wrote:So you're just a total fucking douchebag all the time. Got it.
And judging by your LSAT practice scores, you are proving me right - high LSAT doesn't mean intelligent.
- Mike12188
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:07 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
One of the best episodes.2807 wrote:Bahahahah...
Prison Mike ! That is too funny.
- 2807
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:23 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
JG Hall wrote:Back to the topic...
Exams are different at NYU/CLS than at Pace or NYLS or some other TTT NY school because they typically learn black letter law at TTTs.
This is what I was told too. Not sure of the long term difference, but that is exactly what an advisor told me. The TTT schools really focus on the black letter law to get the bar pass rate up. Where the top schools can blend hypo and black letter smoother due to a higher level of academic achievement within the populace.
If you gear the lesson plan to the lowest common denominator, then I guess the top schools have some leeway.
Of course, once you leave school and enter the real world all of that "intelligence" becomes increasingly less useful, turns to arrogance, and becomes a crutch. No one cares how intelligent you were in law school. Just win the case Einstein.
Smart people go in smart, and remain smart. I like smart.
I am glad it is easy to spell TTTT. It makes me feel intelligent.
And, there is no T in Harvard. damn. That is not smart.
- JG Hall
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:18 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
No blending. You learn no black letter law at "decent" law schools. They trust that if you had enough in you to earn the grades in UG, and/or kill the LSAT, you probably manage cramming for the Bar on your own, too. That's why I found it funny that a transfer told me she really likes Class X because she got to concentrate on all this theory and horseshit. Welcome to the real law school, sweetie.
- prezidentv8
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
2807 wrote:Harvard...is not smart.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JG Hall
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:18 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
PS - This is not true. When you go to lateral, firms will ask for your ls transcript.2807 wrote: No one cares how intelligent you were in law school.
- 2807
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:23 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
hahahahahaprezidentv8 wrote:2807 wrote:Harvard...is not smart.
tricky smart guy.
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
"decent" law schools teach people how to thinkJG Hall wrote:No blending. You learn no black letter law at "decent" law schools. They trust that if you had enough in you to earn the grades in UG, and/or kill the LSAT, you probably manage cramming for the Bar on your own, too. That's why I found it funny that a transfer told me she really likes Class X because she got to concentrate on all this theory and horseshit. Welcome to the real law school, sweetie.
crappy law schools teach the law
but presumably people at "Decent" law schools already know how to think, and people at crappy law schools are too dum to apply the law anyway
not the most intuitive system out there
lateraling is for TTT douchefucks who're too dum to make partnerJG Hall wrote:PS - This is not true. When you go to lateral, firms will ask for your ls transcript.2807 wrote: No one cares how intelligent you were in law school.
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- California Babe
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Your interpretation seems more realistic. We're talking about a large group of people you're being graded with, not the outliers who are much smarter/dumber than their classmates.Helmholtz wrote:I don't think that's what that statement is implying. If marshponds comes back on and posts that, yes, he did intend his statement to mean that there is zero intelligence at any law school not highly ranked, then I will concede the point.kalvano wrote:Helmholtz wrote:Of course intelligence and highly-ranked law schools are not mutually inclusive. Who implied that?marshponds wrote:Of course they're harder. What makes an exam hard isn't the question being asked but the people against whom you are graded.
A further point here needs to be made, though, about "intelligence" and success in law school. It's possible for the LSAT (+ GPA, etc) to measure how well you will do in law school without it being a measurement of how intelligent you are. Someone who crushed the LSAT might not be more "intelligent" than their classmates, but they sure as hell might kick their butts on the exam, too.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:10 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
There are two meanings of "difficulty" that are relevant to the thread. The first is what I would consider the objective difficulty of an exam. This would be the difference between an exam that only asked you to list the elements of battery and one that asked you to write an entirely new system of tort law (and your reasons for choosing such a system) for a new planet, the needs of which were laid out in the exam. There are different levels of thinking involved in each, yet both would require at least a minimal mastery of tort law. The second meaning of difficulty is how one's performance would stack up against the curve. If you take the same test (thus keeping the objective difficulty the same) in a class of Columbia students and a class of Cooley students, you will have a lower rank relative to others in the Columbia class than in the Cooley class.
Attending a T2, I have always assumed the exams at T14-25ish schools would, on average, be more difficult with respect to the first meaning. Without a doubt, they are more difficult under the second meaning. I have had a mix of what I would consider to be easy and difficult tests, and I by far prefer the difficult tests. An "easy" test means the curve is one big clump, and small errors here or there will move your grade quickly. I'd rather be asked to lay out everything I know while using the highest level of thinking that I can and be judged accordingly. I think that will provide more accurate grading. I would assume you would need more difficult exams as the difficulty of getting into the school increases to be able to separate students fairly.
Are there any good examples of exams or exam questions from some of the top schools? N=1 examples suck, but it would at least help in guiding the discussion by providing examples of what is difficult and hopefully advance this from assumptions and declarations.
Attending a T2, I have always assumed the exams at T14-25ish schools would, on average, be more difficult with respect to the first meaning. Without a doubt, they are more difficult under the second meaning. I have had a mix of what I would consider to be easy and difficult tests, and I by far prefer the difficult tests. An "easy" test means the curve is one big clump, and small errors here or there will move your grade quickly. I'd rather be asked to lay out everything I know while using the highest level of thinking that I can and be judged accordingly. I think that will provide more accurate grading. I would assume you would need more difficult exams as the difficulty of getting into the school increases to be able to separate students fairly.
Are there any good examples of exams or exam questions from some of the top schools? N=1 examples suck, but it would at least help in guiding the discussion by providing examples of what is difficult and hopefully advance this from assumptions and declarations.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
My God, those statements don't necessarily contradict one another at all.kalvano wrote:Helmholtz wrote:Of course intelligence and highly-ranked law schools are not mutually inclusive. Who implied that?marshponds wrote:Of course they're harder. What makes an exam hard isn't the question being asked but the people against whom you are graded.
Summary of the thread:
A: People at a T2 are as smart as people at a T14. I know this because there's smart people at my school and I've met high LSAT scorers who are very dumb.
B: While there are always outliers, average kid at a T14 is typically smarter than the average kid at a T2.
A: That's not true. There's smart people at my school and I've met high LSAT scorers who are very dumb.
Riveting.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Using "smart" and "dumb" in this context is really pointless. How do you define these terms? Most PhDs in engineering are "smart" but probably wouldn't do that well on the LSAT. Most PhDs in philosophy would probably do well on the LSAT, but aren't really "smart."
The larger correlations people are trying to draw here are meaningless. The OP's question has nothing to do with "smart" versus "dumb". It has to do with the difficulty of law school exams at various schools. It's pretty obvious that exams at better schools will be more difficult. Law schools are segregated by LSAT, and the LSAT tests your ability to work quickly on highly stylized and artificial problems while maintaining logical accuracy. By and large, law school exams test this same skill, with the addition of a memory component.
The larger correlations people are trying to draw here are meaningless. The OP's question has nothing to do with "smart" versus "dumb". It has to do with the difficulty of law school exams at various schools. It's pretty obvious that exams at better schools will be more difficult. Law schools are segregated by LSAT, and the LSAT tests your ability to work quickly on highly stylized and artificial problems while maintaining logical accuracy. By and large, law school exams test this same skill, with the addition of a memory component.
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Iuno, I hear there are smart people at T2 and dumb ones at T14. Surely, that invalidates your entire argument.rayiner wrote:It's pretty obvious that exams at better schools will be more difficult.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
There are no doubt smart people at T2s and dumb people at T14s, but I have to wonder how this guy defines "smart" and "dumb." "Dude talks about Kantian realism!" = smart and "dude sits around and watches football" = dumb?dresden doll wrote:Iuno, I hear there are smart people at T2 and dumb ones at T14. Surely, that invalidates your entire argument.rayiner wrote:It's pretty obvious that exams at better schools will be more difficult.
- nealric
- Posts: 4273
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
Most of my evidence comes from transfers and profs who taught at other schools, but here is my experience:
Transfers from T3/T4s generally said that GULC exams were much more difficult. Such schools will have exams that rely heavily on multiple choice and even fill in the blank.
Transfers from T50s usually didn't find much of a difference.
I had a visiting prof who had taught at a T50ish school and gave us a copy of the exam she gave there. It was a piece of cake. The exam she gave at GULC was much, much more difficult in terms of question complexity and depth of knowledge required.
Of course, none of that is at all scientific.
Transfers from T3/T4s generally said that GULC exams were much more difficult. Such schools will have exams that rely heavily on multiple choice and even fill in the blank.
Transfers from T50s usually didn't find much of a difference.
I had a visiting prof who had taught at a T50ish school and gave us a copy of the exam she gave there. It was a piece of cake. The exam she gave at GULC was much, much more difficult in terms of question complexity and depth of knowledge required.
Of course, none of that is at all scientific.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:00 pm
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
The LSAT is *very* learnable (witness the LSAT prep forum), so it's not really that good of a measure of intelligence. What does it measure? Some combination of intelligence, dogged determination, luck, and ability to pay for an expensive LSAT prep course. Although there is a correlation between LSAT score and IQ, I don't think it's a direct relationship because so many factors are at play in a person's LSAT score.
As for the original question, I do think exams are probably harder at higher-ranked schools, if only because more highly qualified professors tend to end up at higher-ranked schools because the job market for law professors is hyper-competitive (much more so than law school admissions IMO) and higher-ranked schools tend to hire very highly qualified professors to begin with and poach particularly good professors from lower-ranked schools.
That said, students who are able to transfer up because they were highly ranked at their old school tend to end up top of the class at their new school as well, even if the school itself is a much more highly-ranked school. This seems to indicate that there is some sort of universality about what it takes to do well in law school, but I don't know how it reflects on the relative level of vigor at differently-ranked schools.
As for the original question, I do think exams are probably harder at higher-ranked schools, if only because more highly qualified professors tend to end up at higher-ranked schools because the job market for law professors is hyper-competitive (much more so than law school admissions IMO) and higher-ranked schools tend to hire very highly qualified professors to begin with and poach particularly good professors from lower-ranked schools.
That said, students who are able to transfer up because they were highly ranked at their old school tend to end up top of the class at their new school as well, even if the school itself is a much more highly-ranked school. This seems to indicate that there is some sort of universality about what it takes to do well in law school, but I don't know how it reflects on the relative level of vigor at differently-ranked schools.
- shanemahsa
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:46 am
Re: Are law school finals roughly the same difficulty everywhere
/threadrayiner wrote:It's pretty obvious that exams at better schools will be more difficult.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login