-Greene v. LindseyWe need not go so far as to insist that in order to "dispense with personal service the substitute that is most likely to reach the defendant is the least that ought to be required," in order to recognize that where an inexpensive and efficient mechanism such as mail service is available to enhance the reliability of an otherwise unreliable notice procedure, the State's continued exclusive reliance on an ineffective means of service is not notice "reasonably calculated to reach those who could easily be informed by other means at hand."
That is one (1) sentence, entirely unedited with the exception of an omitted citation. Jesus Christ, it's like some judges never heard of William Strunk's "Elements of Style".