crim pro adjudications vs. wills/trusts/estates?

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )

which is more advisable to take?

crim pro
4
50%
w/t/e
4
50%
 
Total votes: 8

User avatar
logicianwannabe
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:20 pm

crim pro adjudications vs. wills/trusts/estates?

Postby logicianwannabe » Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:36 am

If you don't want to practice in either area, but jut want one more bar course.

User avatar
lsat_fear
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:58 pm

Re: crim pro adjudications vs. wills/trusts/estates?

Postby lsat_fear » Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:07 am

crim pro. then at least you have the option of seeking employment with the PD/DA office if you're having trouble finding a job. plus, in some jurisdictions you can get appointed by the court to represent indigent defendants--you don't want to get appointed and then have no idea what is going on, and maybe even risk getting disciplined for being incompetent. trusts and estates is the most boring course in the entire world. from what i'm told, what you need to know about it for the bar is learnable in 3 days of outline review and practice questions. just my $.009




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Trumpet101 and 4 guests