Babies.

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
IAFG
Posts: 6665
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby IAFG » Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:57 am

jhare wrote:

Oh, crap. I just looked at your profile and realized that you go to soon-to-be TTT Depaul. Sorry about that, I guess I really am talking to someone of inferior intellect. Next time I'll go easy on you. Sorry.

says the dude with a 162?!!!??

User avatar
chicagolaw2013
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby chicagolaw2013 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 1:59 am

jhare wrote:

Oh, crap. I just looked at your profile and realized that you go to soon-to-be TTT Depaul. Sorry about that, I guess I really am talking to someone of inferior intellect. Next time I'll go easy on you. Sorry.


Looked at yours as well...you're going to Loyola, at least that's the only one you got into. Anything under 50 in the rankings is in the same boat. Unless you're T14, you really can't afford to throw around insults there, sweetie, especially when you have less than 100 posts here.

And what TTT did you graduate from for UG? "Small private school" vs. top 25. Hmmmmmmm....

jhare
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Babies.

Postby jhare » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:00 am

IAFG wrote:
jhare wrote:

Oh, crap. I just looked at your profile and realized that you go to soon-to-be TTT Depaul. Sorry about that, I guess I really am talking to someone of inferior intellect. Next time I'll go easy on you. Sorry.

says the dude with a 162?!!!??

\

Edit: never posted my retake this past time around, 170. lol.

User avatar
chicagolaw2013
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby chicagolaw2013 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:01 am

jhare wrote:
IAFG wrote:
jhare wrote:

Oh, crap. I just looked at your profile and realized that you go to soon-to-be TTT Depaul. Sorry about that, I guess I really am talking to someone of inferior intellect. Next time I'll go easy on you. Sorry.

says the dude with a 162?!!!??

\

Edit: never posted my retake this past time around, 170. lol.


And I got a 180, and never posted it. :roll:

Proof or it didn't happen.

12262010
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby 12262010 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:02 am

so much EliTTTIsm up in here.

you guys are both idiots. neither of you will succeed as lawyers.

jhare
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Babies.

Postby jhare » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:02 am

chicagolaw2013 wrote:
jhare wrote:

Oh, crap. I just looked at your profile and realized that you go to soon-to-be TTT Depaul. Sorry about that, I guess I really am talking to someone of inferior intellect. Next time I'll go easy on you. Sorry.


Looked at yours as well...you're going to Loyola, at least that's the only one you got into. Anything under 50 in the rankings is in the same boat. Unless you're T14, you really can't afford to throw around insults there, sweetie, especially when you have less than 100 posts here.

And what TTT did you graduate from for UG? "Small private school" vs. top 25. Hmmmmmmm....



OH, and didn't change that I got off the waitlist at a couple T14 that I never expected to get into. And lol at your T25 UG, like that matters now huh?

User avatar
chicagolaw2013
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby chicagolaw2013 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:03 am

jhare wrote:
chicagolaw2013 wrote:
jhare wrote:

Oh, crap. I just looked at your profile and realized that you go to soon-to-be TTT Depaul. Sorry about that, I guess I really am talking to someone of inferior intellect. Next time I'll go easy on you. Sorry.


Looked at yours as well...you're going to Loyola, at least that's the only one you got into. Anything under 50 in the rankings is in the same boat. Unless you're T14, you really can't afford to throw around insults there, sweetie, especially when you have less than 100 posts here.

And what TTT did you graduate from for UG? "Small private school" vs. top 25. Hmmmmmmm....



OH, and didn't change that I got off the waitlist at a couple T14 that I never expected to get into. And lol at your T25 UG, like that matters now huh?


Again, proof or it didn't happen. Love how you "forgot to change it" now that someone called you out on it. You've been on this site for a total of what? 2 months? Riiiiiiight.

jhare
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Babies.

Postby jhare » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:04 am

chicagolaw2013 wrote:
jhare wrote:
IAFG wrote:
jhare wrote:

Oh, crap. I just looked at your profile and realized that you go to soon-to-be TTT Depaul. Sorry about that, I guess I really am talking to someone of inferior intellect. Next time I'll go easy on you. Sorry.

says the dude with a 162?!!!??

\

Edit: never posted my retake this past time around, 170. lol.


And I got a 180, and never posted it. :roll:

Proof or it didn't happen.


And it would have been proof if I had updated my profile with the 170? ...idiot...

User avatar
chicagolaw2013
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby chicagolaw2013 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:04 am

chicagolaw2013 wrote:Love how you "forgot to change it" now that someone called you out on it. You've been on this site for a total of what? 2 months? Riiiiiiight.


I think I'm just going to quote myself all night to deal with this guy. Jesus.
Last edited by chicagolaw2013 on Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

jhare
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Babies.

Postby jhare » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:04 am

chicagolaw2013 wrote:
jhare wrote:
chicagolaw2013 wrote:
jhare wrote:

Oh, crap. I just looked at your profile and realized that you go to soon-to-be TTT Depaul. Sorry about that, I guess I really am talking to someone of inferior intellect. Next time I'll go easy on you. Sorry.


Looked at yours as well...you're going to Loyola, at least that's the only one you got into. Anything under 50 in the rankings is in the same boat. Unless you're T14, you really can't afford to throw around insults there, sweetie, especially when you have less than 100 posts here.

And what TTT did you graduate from for UG? "Small private school" vs. top 25. Hmmmmmmm....



OH, and didn't change that I got off the waitlist at a couple T14 that I never expected to get into. And lol at your T25 UG, like that matters now huh?


Again, proof or it didn't happen. Love how you "forgot to change it" now that someone called you out on it. You've been on this site for a total of what? 2 months? Riiiiiiight.


sorry, but this doesn't change the fact that you're still going to DePaul. Sad for you.

jhare
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Babies.

Postby jhare » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:05 am

chicagolaw2013 wrote:
chicagolaw2013 wrote:Love how you "forgot to change it" now that someone called you out on it. You've been on this site for a total of what? 2 months? Riiiiiiight.


I think I'm just going to quote myself all night to deal with this guy. Jesus.



Interesting tactic...

User avatar
chicagolaw2013
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby chicagolaw2013 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:06 am

jhare wrote:sorry, but this doesn't change the fact that you're still going to DePaul. Sad for you.


God, I really fear for your child. Hope he/she doesn't end up at DePaul HAHAHA. Daddy would hate his own kid...sad.

12262010
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby 12262010 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:08 am

you guys make a strong argument for the benefits of forced sterilization.

jhare
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Babies.

Postby jhare » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:08 am

chicagolaw2013 wrote:
jhare wrote:sorry, but this doesn't change the fact that you're still going to DePaul. Sad for you.


God, I really fear for your child. Hope he/she doesn't end up at DePaul HAHAHA. Daddy would hate his own kid...sad.


Oh God, I hope he doesn't end up at DePaul either. LMFAO. Perfect time to leave this thread. Hope life in Chicago is good, I heard it was nice. Night :wink:

User avatar
James Bond
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: Babies.

Postby James Bond » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:10 am

booyakasha wrote:you guys make a strong argument for the benefits of forced sterilization.


lol your consistent comments are gold boo

12262010
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby 12262010 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:11 am

James Bond wrote:
booyakasha wrote:you guys make a strong argument for the benefits of forced sterilization.


lol your consistent comments are gold boo


finally, I've been acknowledged. maybe I should sleep now.

User avatar
chicagolaw2013
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby chicagolaw2013 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:11 am

booyakasha wrote:you guys make a strong argument for the benefits of forced sterilization.


How exactly do I? I brought up a valid argument, called this guy out for debate, and got insulted and fired back. I think I actually would make a great example of not bowing out of a discussion you feel strongly about and for which you have evidence to back you up. Plus, you don't bring up my mother, and expect me to sit idly by, which he did. He didn't like it when I threw that back in his direction.

User avatar
James Bond
Posts: 2349
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: Babies.

Postby James Bond » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 am

booyakasha wrote:
James Bond wrote:
booyakasha wrote:you guys make a strong argument for the benefits of forced sterilization.


lol your consistent comments are gold boo


finally, I've been acknowledged. maybe I should sleep now.


I can't. :? Too excited for tomorrow. I'm like a little kid

12262010
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby 12262010 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 am

James Bond wrote:
booyakasha wrote:
James Bond wrote:
booyakasha wrote:you guys make a strong argument for the benefits of forced sterilization.


lol your consistent comments are gold boo


finally, I've been acknowledged. maybe I should sleep now.


I can't. :? Too excited for tomorrow. I'm like a little kid


what's tomorrow? LSAT score?

User avatar
chicagolaw2013
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby chicagolaw2013 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:14 am

jhare wrote:
chicagolaw2013 wrote:
jhare wrote:sorry, but this doesn't change the fact that you're still going to DePaul. Sad for you.


God, I really fear for your child. Hope he/she doesn't end up at DePaul HAHAHA. Daddy would hate his own kid...sad.


Oh God, I hope he doesn't end up at DePaul either. LMFAO. Perfect time to leave this thread. Hope life in Chicago is good, I heard it was nice. Night :wink:


I deem you an "elementary school child", as you did me before, for this whole "going to bed" notion. LOL total idiot.

12262010
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:15 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby 12262010 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:15 am

chicagolaw2013 wrote:
I deem you an "elementary school child", as you did me before, for this whole "going to bed" notion. LOL total idiot.


ok you can stop now.

User avatar
romothesavior
Posts: 14772
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby romothesavior » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:15 am

JESUS H. CHRIST you two are stupid.

I have been waiting for a mod to move this ridiculously stupid thread to the lobby. I'm tired of you two bumping it to the front page. But hey, a lock works just as well.

User avatar
20160810
Posts: 19648
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby 20160810 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:16 am

What the hell is happening here?

I thought it was pretty settled that the older you are, the more likely birth defects become?

User avatar
acrossthelake
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby acrossthelake » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:17 am

SoftBoiledLife wrote:What the hell is happening here?

I thought it was pretty settled that the older you are, the more likely birth defects become?


I was hoping there would actually be advice on how to balance career with babies. :(

User avatar
chicagolaw2013
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Babies.

Postby chicagolaw2013 » Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:17 am

Chromosomal, not all birth defects.

This idiot was confusing correlation and causation.

He's gone now, all good. Back to babies.




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests