corporatelaw87 wrote:I am reading GTM right now, I am only through a couple of chapters, but in terms of their examples, I am not really sure what they are talking about. I guess because i haven't sat in a Law School class yet. Is this normal?
As a 0L I'm not sweating the examples too hard. Or to put it another way...each example seems to sort of be structured so that it says, "Here's the example. As you know from law school, (I don't know this from law school) Rule A says this, and Rule B says this contradictory thing. Here's how we would write about each of them in our analysis." Since I don't know Rules A or B from Adam since I haven't been to law school yet, I'm just taking that at face value and assuming that by test day I will. In other words, I'm not worrying to much about the specific examples so much as getting a general feeling of what they're doing with them.