http://www.top-law-schools.com/ConMan345 wrote:disco, apper, rayiner, how did you respectively teach yourselves the right approach to the exam? Practice exams and model answers? GTM? etc
Bottom of the class? Forum
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
It's not NOT the cr, but it's also a laundry list. Walking the walk muuuuuuuuuch harder than talking the talk when it comes to things like this, especially when fighting against time limits and anxiety and confusion. Most of these platitudes get conveyed to law students. You can memorize every character in them and it won't save you. You've got to teach yourself to do them - to make it instinct - and to know when you're doing it right and when you're not.solidsnake wrote:TITCRLlewellyn wrote:General tips from a professor at my school re: exam taking.
1. Make sure you read the facts correctly, and have interpreted the question correctly.
2. Apply the law to the facts of the question, not the law to the facts of arbitrary questions not asked.
3. Focus on the ambiguities in the question.
4. Recognize and explain both sides, before resolving the issues.
5. If you resolve one issue one way, continue your analysis as if the issue was resolved in the other direction.
6. Do not restate the facts.
7. Do not restate the law unless it applies to your analysis of the issue.
8. Write literately, concisely, and in an organized fashion: make a point and then refute that point in the next sentence, do not make a point and refute that point two paragraphs down.
- apper123
- Posts: 981
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
also ive never sat down and taken a full practice exam... ever. i look over them for strategy reasons definitely and maybe sometimes outline answers, but i've never actually simulated the exam before the exam day. dunno. works better for me that way.
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
+1 to the sentiment. I know a lot of practice exam grinders, and many of them found success, but I also know people who took few if any and still did well.apper123 wrote:also ive never sat down and taken a full practice exam... ever. i look over them for strategy reasons definitely and maybe sometimes outline answers, but i've never actually simulated the exam before the exam day. dunno. works better for me that way.
You have to always be aware of them and learn from them, but there are soooo many ways to properly prepare. But 10x as many ways to improperly prepare
- rbgrocio
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:58 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
I agree with this. Like you can know the law perfectly and still not write a perfect exam. We had four hours for Civ. Pro and I still couldn't put in everything I know she is expecting. Did I know the answers? YES. Was I able to apply everything? NO. It gets to the point were you just have to move on to the next essay and some points in the previous one may be completely mediocre, but you just have to move on!!! the beauty of the curve is that if you forget to put in 5 things, and someone forgets 6.... you are still ahead of the gamedisco_barred wrote:It's not NOT the cr, but it's also a laundry list. Walking the walk muuuuuuuuuch harder than talking the talk when it comes to things like this, especially when fighting against time limits and anxiety and confusion. Most of these platitudes get conveyed to law students. You can memorize every character in them and it won't save you. You've got to teach yourself to do them - to make it instinct - and to know when you're doing it right and when you're not.solidsnake wrote:TITCRLlewellyn wrote:General tips from a professor at my school re: exam taking.
1. Make sure you read the facts correctly, and have interpreted the question correctly.
2. Apply the law to the facts of the question, not the law to the facts of arbitrary questions not asked.
3. Focus on the ambiguities in the question.
4. Recognize and explain both sides, before resolving the issues.
5. If you resolve one issue one way, continue your analysis as if the issue was resolved in the other direction.
6. Do not restate the facts.
7. Do not restate the law unless it applies to your analysis of the issue.
8. Write literately, concisely, and in an organized fashion: make a point and then refute that point in the next sentence, do not make a point and refute that point two paragraphs down.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Llewellyn
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:07 am
Re: Bottom of the class?
Generally, after making my outline I would review it, read some hornbooks/ go over notes/ etc to fill the gaps in my outline, then I would stare at my outline until my eyeballs bleed identifying places in the outline that denote things like 1) X happens when A exists, Y happens when A' exists, 2) A implies C and then D, but A' implies only C, 3) A and B imply C, but A alone implies C', etc. You know you prepared for a test when you can look at an outline and imagine ambiguities that exist within the law as you currently understand it.
I disagree. You learn the steps and make them innate to your nature, then you don't need to worry about shit. I didn't read those tips until after my first semester and I realized I was doing everything already enumerated.disco_barred wrote:It's not NOT the cr, but it's also a laundry list. Walking the walk muuuuuuuuuch harder than talking the talk when it comes to things like this, especially when fighting against time limits and anxiety and confusion. Most of these platitudes get conveyed to law students. You can memorize every character in them and it won't save you. You've got to teach yourself to do them - to make it instinct - and to know when you're doing it right and when you're not.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am
Re: Bottom of the class?
I don't know who voted you TLS motivational speaker/self-help guru but it should stop. That list is what profs are looking for. There's no magic to law exams other than the quality in which you do the above. Some ppl have a natural talent to qualitatively write better legal analysis and argumentation. NOt knowing how to write an exam means not doing all of the above, but even once you 'know' how or what it is you are supposed to be writing, that doesn't speak to the issue of how qualitatively well you are doing it. No amount of tls self-help talk is going to save you. Practice and training your mind might. But your endless threads and preaching never even get that far.disco_barred wrote:It's not NOT the cr, but it's also a laundry list. Walking the walk muuuuuuuuuch harder than talking the talk when it comes to things like this, especially when fighting against time limits and anxiety and confusion. Most of these platitudes get conveyed to law students. You can memorize every character in them and it won't save you. You've got to teach yourself to do them - to make it instinct - and to know when you're doing it right and when you're not.solidsnake wrote:TITCRLlewellyn wrote:General tips from a professor at my school re: exam taking.
1. Make sure you read the facts correctly, and have interpreted the question correctly.
2. Apply the law to the facts of the question, not the law to the facts of arbitrary questions not asked.
3. Focus on the ambiguities in the question.
4. Recognize and explain both sides, before resolving the issues.
5. If you resolve one issue one way, continue your analysis as if the issue was resolved in the other direction.
6. Do not restate the facts.
7. Do not restate the law unless it applies to your analysis of the issue.
8. Write literately, concisely, and in an organized fashion: make a point and then refute that point in the next sentence, do not make a point and refute that point two paragraphs down.
- A'nold
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:07 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
+1 to not doing practice exams. I did a few smallish hypos last semester and learned from my mistakes from the first one I did. Maybe I'd do better if I did more practice tests, I don't know.
- RUQRU
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:32 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
If you want to stay out of the bottom, read this:
How to Do Your Best on Law School Exams [Paperback]
John Delaney
http://www.amazon.com/How-Your-Best-Sch ... 611&sr=1-1
# Paperback: 166 pages
# Publisher: John Delaney Publications; October 2006 edition (November 2006)
# Language: English
# ISBN-10: 0960851453
# ISBN-13: 978-0960851454
Also,
LEEWS at leews.com
How to Do Your Best on Law School Exams [Paperback]
John Delaney
http://www.amazon.com/How-Your-Best-Sch ... 611&sr=1-1
# Paperback: 166 pages
# Publisher: John Delaney Publications; October 2006 edition (November 2006)
# Language: English
# ISBN-10: 0960851453
# ISBN-13: 978-0960851454
Also,
LEEWS at leews.com
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:06 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
He isn't wrong though. Its hard to walk the walk, I didn't nearly as much as I should have. Its far easier to spend hours in the library than train your mind to follow through on what actually matters. But if you do even some of the things on the list you are going to be around median at most schools.solidsnake wrote:
I don't know who voted you TLS motivational speaker/self-help guru but it should stop. That list is what profs are looking for. There's no magic to law exams other than the quality in which you do the above. Some ppl have a natural talent to qualitatively write better legal analysis and argumentation. NOt knowing how to write an exam means not doing all of the above, but even once you 'know' how or what it is you are supposed to be writing, that doesn't speak to the issue of how qualitatively well you are doing it. No amount of tls self-help talk is going to save you. Practice and training your mind might. But your endless threads and preaching never even get that far.
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
ITP, the solidsnake attacks disco_barred, attack's disco_barred's point, makes the same point as disco_barred, agrees with disco_barred's point, attacks disco_barred again for good measure.solidsnake wrote:I don't know who voted you TLS motivational speaker/self-help guru but it should stop. That list is what profs are looking for. There's no magic to law exams other than the quality in which you do the above. Some ppl have a natural talent to qualitatively write better legal analysis and argumentation. NOt knowing how to write an exam means not doing all of the above, but even once you 'know' how or what it is you are supposed to be writing, that doesn't speak to the issue of how qualitatively well you are doing it. No amount of tls self-help talk is going to save you. Practice and training your mind might. But your endless threads and preaching never even get that far.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am
Re: Bottom of the class?
No i just make the point in a qualitatively better way the right attitude for tackling law exams; the ad homs were just for fun
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
baha, either way I feel like we're more or less on the same page. Wooo law school.solidsnake wrote:No i just make the point in a qualitatively better way the right attitude for tackling law exams; the ad homs were just for fun
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am
Re: Bottom of the class?
Agreed. Only in law school (but hopefully in practice) do we get to fight not only about the point, but the way in which it was made, the degree to which it furthered the purpose of making the point, alternatives and consequences of both following and ignoring the point, and whether the purpose, let alone the point itself, is the type of thing we want to be supporting anyway.disco_barred wrote:baha, either way I feel like we're more or less on the same page. Wooo law school.solidsnake wrote:No i just make the point in a qualitatively better way the right attitude for tackling law exams; the ad homs were just for fun
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 3:17 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
HA. Can't wait.solidsnake wrote:Agreed. Only in law school (but hopefully in practice) do we get to fight not only about the point, but the way in which it was made, the degree to which it furthered the purpose of making the point, alternatives and consequences of both following and ignoring the point, and whether the purpose, let alone the point itself, is the type of thing we want to be supporting anyway.disco_barred wrote:baha, either way I feel like we're more or less on the same page. Wooo law school.solidsnake wrote:No i just make the point in a qualitatively better way the right attitude for tackling law exams; the ad homs were just for fun
- let/them/eat/cake
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:20 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
o the lulz.KMaine wrote: ....
People in law school are smart. I think "working hard" and "working smart" are very important, but you cannot be sure of anything with the curve. Those people who just didn't give a shit in college, they are not in law school. And even the people who don't work that hard may be good at law school tests and can cram well enough to beat the curve.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:49 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
I'd be interested in hearing what skills you find applicable to law school exams. Been playing off and on for seven years or so, myself. Any serious player knows that the skills are transferable to a wide variety of contexts-- just curious as to what skills you think apply, and how...apper123 wrote:
To be completely honest, and I'm dead serious when I say this, I'm a very serious poker player and have been playing successfully for 6 years now. And truthfully a lot of those skills are immensely helpful on a law exam.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- webbylu87
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:07 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
I'm tagging this as it's actually been pretty damn helpful.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
Better hope the mods don't see this... or its BANHAMMER FOR YOU!webbylu87 wrote:I'm tagging this as it's actually been pretty damn helpful.
- webbylu87
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:07 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
Gah! (...and what for exactly?)
- A'nold
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:07 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
I'm pretty dang good at poker too, fwiw.teebone51 wrote:I'd be interested in hearing what skills you find applicable to law school exams. Been playing off and on for seven years or so, myself. Any serious player knows that the skills are transferable to a wide variety of contexts-- just curious as to what skills you think apply, and how...apper123 wrote:
To be completely honest, and I'm dead serious when I say this, I'm a very serious poker player and have been playing successfully for 6 years now. And truthfully a lot of those skills are immensely helpful on a law exam.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- truthypants
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:50 am
Re: Bottom of the class?
Do the law preview course. They have an online course (for like 100 bucks)--you can look at the material anytime and it has model law school exam answers (fully explained-why it has a good structure, what you need to include in your answer, how to do analysis/spot issues in an exam setting, etc.). It's really good--got me As.ConMan345 wrote:disco, apper, rayiner, how did you respectively teach yourselves the right approach to the exam? Practice exams and model answers? GTM? etc
-
- Posts: 2431
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 9:51 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
Heretic.truthypants wrote:Do the law preview course. They have an online course (for like 100 bucks)--you can look at the material anytime and it has model law school exam answers (fully explained-why it has a good structure, what you need to include in your answer, how to do analysis/spot issues in an exam setting, etc.). It's really good--got me As.ConMan345 wrote:disco, apper, rayiner, how did you respectively teach yourselves the right approach to the exam? Practice exams and model answers? GTM? etc
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
I dunno... the mods here are really anti-tagging. They usually do like a 24 hour or less slap on the wrist. Kinda ridiculous if you ask me.webbylu87 wrote:Gah! (...and what for exactly?)
- webbylu87
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:07 pm
Re: Bottom of the class?
Ah right. First I've heard of this phenomenon. Duly noted.romothesavior wrote:I dunno... the mods here are really anti-tagging. They usually do like a 24 hour or less slap on the wrist. Kinda ridiculous if you ask me.webbylu87 wrote:Gah! (...and what for exactly?)
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login