McCardle/Boumedeine Forum

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
Post Reply
dreman510

Bronze
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:02 pm

McCardle/Boumedeine

Post by dreman510 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:59 pm

For Conlaw
Im not really clear on what the rule is coming from these two cases.

From Ex-parte McCardle-basically, Congress can strip SCOTUS appellate review, BUT only if there are other avenues in place? Is it just me or does that basically mean that it accomplishes nothing?

Boumedeine-not really clear on it at all

Ignatius J. Reilly

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:07 pm

Re: McCardle/Boumedeine

Post by Ignatius J. Reilly » Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:35 pm

All I will say is that even though I took ConLaw last year, there basically is no "rule" coming from those cases, as is the case with many ConLaw cases. Sorry I can't be more specific about the cases, but the bottom line is that in many ConLaw cases there is no "rule" per se.

dreman510

Bronze
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: McCardle/Boumedeine

Post by dreman510 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:39 pm

Ignatius J. Reilly wrote:All I will say is that even though I took ConLaw last year, there basically is no "rule" coming from those cases, as is the case with many ConLaw cases. Sorry I can't be more specific about the cases, but the bottom line is that in many ConLaw cases there is no "rule" per se.
ARGGGGGGGGGGGGGG :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

pandacot

Bronze
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:39 pm

Re: McCardle/Boumedeine

Post by pandacot » Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:11 pm

dreman510 wrote:For Conlaw
Im not really clear on what the rule is coming from these two cases.

From Ex-parte McCardle-basically, Congress can strip SCOTUS appellate review, BUT only if there are other avenues in place? Is it just me or does that basically mean that it accomplishes nothing?

Boumedeine-not really clear on it at all
Have you looked up the cases in the Chemerinsky supplement? Might be helpful...might not.

dreman510

Bronze
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: McCardle/Boumedeine

Post by dreman510 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:12 pm

pandacot wrote:
dreman510 wrote:For Conlaw
Im not really clear on what the rule is coming from these two cases.

From Ex-parte McCardle-basically, Congress can strip SCOTUS appellate review, BUT only if there are other avenues in place? Is it just me or does that basically mean that it accomplishes nothing?

Boumedeine-not really clear on it at all
Have you looked up the cases in the Chemerinsky supplement? Might be helpful...might not.
looked up McCardle...not really helpful.
Boumedeine isnt in there, its too new

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


pandacot

Bronze
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:39 pm

Re: McCardle/Boumedeine

Post by pandacot » Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:13 pm

dreman510 wrote:
pandacot wrote:
dreman510 wrote:For Conlaw
Im not really clear on what the rule is coming from these two cases.

From Ex-parte McCardle-basically, Congress can strip SCOTUS appellate review, BUT only if there are other avenues in place? Is it just me or does that basically mean that it accomplishes nothing?

Boumedeine-not really clear on it at all
Have you looked up the cases in the Chemerinsky supplement? Might be helpful...might not.
looked up McCardle...not really helpful.
Boumedeine isnt in there, its too new
Try calling Chemerinsky. I think he's still Dean of whereeverthefuck.

dreman510

Bronze
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:02 pm

Re: McCardle/Boumedeine

Post by dreman510 » Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:14 pm

pandacot wrote:
dreman510 wrote:
pandacot wrote:
dreman510 wrote:For Conlaw
Im not really clear on what the rule is coming from these two cases.

From Ex-parte McCardle-basically, Congress can strip SCOTUS appellate review, BUT only if there are other avenues in place? Is it just me or does that basically mean that it accomplishes nothing?

Boumedeine-not really clear on it at all
Have you looked up the cases in the Chemerinsky supplement? Might be helpful...might not.
looked up McCardle...not really helpful.
Boumedeine isnt in there, its too new
Try calling Chemerinsky. I think he's still Dean of whereeverthefuck.
Will do, anyone have his cellphone number?
Do they put it on UC-Irvine apps?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Forum for Law School Students”